Download PDF
Endoscopy 2013; 45(12): 1047-1053
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1359089
Review
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

UEG Week 2013 highlights: putting endoscopy into perspective

Ioannis S. Papanikolaou
1   Hepatogastroenterology Unit, 2nd Department of Internal Medicine and Research Unit, “Attikon” University General Hospital, University of Athens, Greece
,
Peter D. Siersema
2   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
28 November 2013 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

The 21st United European Gastroenterology (UEG) Week was held in Berlin in October 2013 and presented the opportunity for those interested in gastrointestinal endoscopy to learn of recent developments and research trends from all over the world. This report highlights oral presentations of the most important and exciting topics in gastrointestinal endoscopy and reviews them in the context of current knowledge.

 

  • References

  • 1 Linghu E, Li H. Randomized study comparing peroral endoscopic myotomy, botulinum toxin injection and balloon dilation for achalasia. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013; 1: A25 (OP081)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Molina-Infante J, Rivas MD, Vinagre-Rodriguez G et al. Proton pump inhibitor-responsive oesophageal eosinophilia correlates with downregulation of eotaxin-3 and Th2 cytokines. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013; 1: A123-124 (OP422)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Straumann A, Bussmann C, Collins LP et al. Treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis with the CRTH2-antagonist OC000459: a novel therapeutic principle. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013; 1: A123 (OP421)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Di Pietro M, Bird-Lieberman E, Liu X et al. The combination of autofluorescence imaging and probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy can accurately diagnose dysplasia in Barrett’s oesophagus. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013; 1: A38-39 (OP124)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Bratlie SO, Edebo A, Johnsson E et al. High definition magnification endoscopy with multiple band imaging versus standard white light endoscopy in Barrett’s esophagus. A prospective randomized blinded cross-over study. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013; 1: A39-40 (OP127)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Phoa KN, van Vilsteren F, Weusten B et al. Radiofrequency ablation in Barrett’s esophagus with confirmed low-grade dysplasia reduces neoplastic progression: results of the SURF randomized trial. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013; 1: A53-54 (OP175-LB1)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Li QL, Zhou PH, He MJ et al. Comparison of endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection (EPMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for superficial esophageal lesion larger than 15 mm. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013; 1: A120 (OP405)
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Soetikno R, Kaltenbach T, Yeh R et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection for early cancers of the upper gastrointestinal tract. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 4490-4498
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Gotoda T, Yanagisawa A, Sasako M et al. Incidence of lymph node metastasis from early gastric cancer: estimation with a large number of cases at two large centers. Gastric Cancer 2000; 3: 219-225
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Probst A, Anthuber M, Maerkl B et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in early gastric cancer (EGC) – resection beyond the “guideline criteria’’ in Europe. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013; 1: A25 (OP083)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Yamashina T, Mochizuki S, Oda I et al. Scheduled second-look endoscopy is not necessary after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasms: a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (the SAFE trial). United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013; 1: A45 (OP148)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Liping Y, Yu Z, Xin-Li M et al. Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for upper gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013; 1: A7 (OP024)
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Xu MD, Wang XY, Zhou PH et al. Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for submucosal tumors of the esophagogastric junction originating from the muscularis propria layer: a feasibility study. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013; 1: A119 (OP403)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Papanikolaou IS. UEG week 2012 report: putting endoscopy into perspective. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 377-391
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Papanikolaou IS, Rösch T. UEGW 2011 report: putting endoscopy into perspective. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 512-526
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Sung JJ, Luo D, Wu JC et al. Early clinical experience of the safety and effectiveness of Hemospray in achieving hemostasis in patients with acute peptic ulcer bleeding. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 291-529
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Holster IL, Kuipers EJ, Tjwa ET. Hemospray in the treatment of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in patients on antithrombotic therapy. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 63-66
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Leblanc S, Vienne A, Coriat R et al. Hemospray™ powder for the control of upper gastrointestinal bleeding following therapeutic endoscopy: preliminary experience in 12 patients. Gut 2012; 61: A425
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Leung Ki EL, Lau JY. New endoscopic hemostasis methods. Clin Endosc 2012; 45: 224-229
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Ibrahim M, El-Mikkawy A, Mostafa I et al. Endoscopic treatment of acute variceal hemorrhage using hemostatic powder TC-325: a prospective pilot study. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013; 1: A18-LB1 (OP057)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Ibrahim M, El-Mikkawy A, Mostafa I et al. Hemostatic powder for the treatment of acute bleeding from duodenal varices. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013; 1: A91-92 (OP307)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Stanley AJ, Smith LA, Morris AJ. Use of hemostatic powder (Hemospray) in the management of refractory gastric variceal hemorrhage. Endoscopy 2013; 45: E86-E87
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Holster IL, Poley JW, Kuipers EJ et al. Controlling gastric variceal bleeding with endoscopically applied hemostatic powder (Hemospray™). J Hepatol 2012; 57: 1397-1398
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 von Renteln D, Kratt T, Rösch T et al. Endoscopic full-thickness resection and defect closure of the colon wall using a clip and cut technique. Endoscopy 2011; 43: A47
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Hucl T, Benes M, Kocik M et al. Over-the-scope-clip closure of gastric and colonic access sites in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. Endoscopy 2011; 43: A48
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Manta R, Galloro G, Manno M et al. Rescue therapy with over through-the-scope clips (OTSC) for acute GI complex bleeding unresponsive to conventional endoscopic treatment: results of a multicenter Italian study. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013; 1: A82 (OP271)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Rembacken B, Hassan C, Riemann JF et al. Quality in screening colonoscopy: position statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). Endoscopy 2012; 44: 957-968
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Davila RE, Rajan E, Baron TH et al. ASGE guideline: colorectal cancer screening and surveillance. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 546-557
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM et al. Interval cancers after negative colonoscopy: population-based case-control study. Gut 2012; 61: 1576-1582
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Leufkens AM, van Oijen MG, Vleggaar FP et al. Factors influencing the miss rate of polyps in a back-to-back colonoscopy study. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 470-475
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Gingold-Belfer R, Geller A, Vilkin A et al. Interval cancer after normal colonoscopy: physician’s Z score for polyp detection rate is the most important factor. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013; 1: A73 (OP240)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Chung SJ, Kim D. Efficacy of narrow band imaging and Fuji intelligent color enhancement in comparison with conventional colonoscopy on colon cancer screening: a prospective, randomized, back-to-back trial in 1559 health check-up Koreans. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A83
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Adler A, Pohl H, Papanikolaou IS et al. A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect?. Gut 2008; 57: 59-64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Gralnek IM, Segol O, Suissa A et al. A prospective cohort study evaluating a novel colonoscopy platform featuring full-spectrum endoscopy. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 697-702
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Siersema PD, Gralnek IM, Halpern Z et al. Full spectrum endoscopy vs. traditional forward-viewing colonoscopy: final results of a randomized, multicenter tandem study – the FUSE study. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013; 1: A86 (OP285)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Gralnek IM, Siersema PD, Rex DK et al. FUSE TM colonoscopy significantly impacts adenoma surveillance recommendations – data from a prospective multicenter randomized tandem colonoscopy study. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013; 1: A69-70 (OP228-LB5)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Shpak B, Halpern Z, Kiesslich R et al. A novel balloon-colonoscope for increased polyp detection rate – intermediate results of a randomized tandem study. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013; 1: A86 (OP286)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Pasha SF, Harrison ME, Das A et al. Utility of double-balloon colonoscopy for completion of colon examination after incomplete colonoscopy with conventional colonoscope. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 848-853
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Britto Arias M, Waldmann E, Salzl P et al. Forceps versus snare usage in polypectomies – are we following the guidelines?. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013; 1: A107 (OP361)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Gerson LB. Capsule endoscopy and deep enteroscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78: 439-443
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Domagk D, Mensink P, Aktas H et al. Single- vs. double-balloon enteroscopy in small-bowel diagnostics: a randomized multicenter trial. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 472-476
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Manno M, Barbera C, Bertani H et al. Double- vs. single-balloon enteroscopy: and the winner is... Endoscopy 2012; 44: 883
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Kida M, Yamauchi H, Okuwaki K et al. A newly designed prototype of short SBE for ERCP in patients with surgically altered anatomy. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013; 1: A11 (OP039)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Papanikolaou IS, Rösch T. UEGW 2010 Report. Putting endoscopy into perspective. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 345-359
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Rey JF, Ogata H, Hosoe N et al. Blinded nonrandomized comparative study of gastric examination with a magnetically guided capsule endoscope and standard videoendoscope. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 373-381
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Rösch T. Progress in endoscopy: areas of current interest and topics to watch out for. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 1148-1157
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Ohta H, Katsuki S, Fujita T et al. A more patient friendly approach to a total gastrointestinal screening by single capsule endoscopy with navigation; using remote desktop control technology. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A60
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Ohta H, Katsuki S, Fujita T et al. First trial of a wireless robotic capsule endoscope equipped with therapeutic tools. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013; 1: A107-A108 (OP362)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Pioche M, Vanbiervliet G, Jacob P et al. Prospective randomized comparison between axial and lateral viewing capsule endoscopy systems in patients with obscure digestive bleeding. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013; 1: A125-126 (OP429)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Dumonceau JM, Tringali A, Blero D et al. Biliary stenting: indications, choice of stents and results: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) clinical guideline. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 277-298
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Halttunen J, Haapamäki C, Udd M et al. Preliminary results of a randomized study of multiple plastic stents versus covered metallic stent (CSEMS) in the treatment of biliary stricture due to chronic pancreatitis. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013; 1: A117 (OP394)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Schmidt A, Fanelli F, Fiocca F et al. Endoscopic treatment of benign biliary strictures with a removable fully covered self- expandable metal stent: preliminary data from a multicenter European study. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013; 1: A116-117 (OP393)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Inatomi O, Bamba S, Kanda T et al. Angled-tip guidewire enables higher procedure completion than straight-tip guidewire in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a randomized controlled trial. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013; 1: A116 (OP391)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Chen YK, Pleskow DK. SpyGlass single-operator peroral cholangiopancreatoscopy system for the diagnosis and therapy of bile-duct disorders: a clinical feasibility study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 832-841
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Kalaitzakis E, Webster GJ, Oppong KW et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic utility of single-operator peroral cholangioscopy for indeterminate biliary lesions and bile duct stones. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 24: 656-664
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Sasahira N, Isayama H, Nagano R et al. Noncalcified pancreatic stone treated with electrohydraulic lithotripsy using SpyGlass pancreatoscopy. Endoscopy 2011; 43 (Suppl. 02) E272
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Kurihara T, Itoi T, Yasuda I et al. single-operator cholangiopancreatoscopy (SOCPS) in patients requiring diagnosis and therapy for biliary and pancreatic diseases: prospective multi-center study in Japan. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013; 1: A11 (OP038)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Mekky MA, Yamao K, Sawaki A et al. Diagnostic utility of EUS-guided FNA in patients with gastric submucosal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 913-919
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Papanikolaou IS, Triantafyllou K, Kourikou A et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography for gastric submucosal lesions. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 3: 86-94
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Konge L, Vilmann P, Clementsen P et al. Reliable and valid assessment of competence in endoscopic ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration for mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 928-933
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Sharma R, Ou S, Ullah A et al. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) of the right adrenal gland. Endoscopy 2012; 44: E385-E386
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Chavalitdhamrong D, Draganov PV. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18: 491-497
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Khashab MA, Kumbhari V, Kalloo AN et al. EUS-guided biliary drainage by using a hepatogastrostomy approach. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78: 675
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Bories E, Caillol F, Pesenti C et al. Endoscopic ultrasound guided hepatogastrostomy: large retrospective study. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013; 1: A29 (OP097)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Walter D, Siersema PS, Vleggaar FP et al. A novel large-diameter metal stent, the AXIOS stent, for endoscopic ultrasonography-guided drainage of peripancreactic fluid collections: a multicenter experience. Endoscopy 2012; 44: A21
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Bapaye A, Itoi T, Kongkam P et al. A new fully covered large bore wide flare metal stent for drainage of pancreatic fluid collections (PFC) – results of a multicenter study. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013; 1: A64 (OP210)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Shah RJ, Shah JN, Waxman I et al. EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (PP) utilizing a novel anchoring, covered self- expanding metal stent (ACSEMS): results from a prospective, multi-center study. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013; 1: A29 (OP099)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Anand N, Sampath K, Wu BU. Cyst features and risk of malignancy in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: a meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11: 913-921
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Papanikolaou IS, Adler A, Neumann U et al. Endoscopic ultrasound in pancreatic disease – its influence on surgical decision-making. An update 2008. Pancreatology 2009; 9: 55-65
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Napoléon B, Lemaistre A-I, Giovannini M et al. Needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (NCLE) allows in vivo characterization of pancreatic serous cystadenomas (SCA). United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013; 1: A10 (OP035)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Karstensen JG, Cartana T, Gheonea DI et al. Pitfalls in the interpretation of pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound guided needle confocal laser endomicroscopy. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013; 1: A100 (OP337)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Eckardt AJ, Adler A, Gomes EM et al. Endosonographic large-bore biopsy of gastric subepithelial tumors: a prospective multicenter study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 24: 1135-1144
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Kobara H, Mori H, Fujiwara S et al. Bloc biopsy by tunneling method using endoscopic submucosal dissection for an upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumor. Endoscopy 2012; 44: E197-E198
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Kobara H, Mori H, Fujihara S et al. Comparison of bloc biopsy using submucosal endoscopy with mucosal flap method versus EUS-FNA for gastrointestinal subepithelial tumor tissue sampling: a prospective study with crossover design. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013; 1: A40 (OP130)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Hong SJ, Seo SW, Han JP et al. Accuracy of a scoring system for the differential diagnosis of common gastric subepithelial tumors based on endoscopic ultrasonography. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2013; 1: A24 (OP079)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar