Synlett 2014; 25(5): 677-680
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1340680
letter
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Addition of α-Lithiated Nitriles to Azaheterocycles

Corey Anderson*
Vertex Pharmaceuticals, 11010 Torreyana Rd., San Diego CA 92121, USA   Fax: +1(858)4046726   Email: Corey_Anderson@vrtx.com
,
Jesus Moreno
Vertex Pharmaceuticals, 11010 Torreyana Rd., San Diego CA 92121, USA   Fax: +1(858)4046726   Email: Corey_Anderson@vrtx.com
,
Sabine Hadida
Vertex Pharmaceuticals, 11010 Torreyana Rd., San Diego CA 92121, USA   Fax: +1(858)4046726   Email: Corey_Anderson@vrtx.com
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 21 November 2013

Accepted after revision: 07 January 2014

Publication Date:
05 February 2014 (online)


Abstract

The addition of α-deprotonated nitriles to azahetero­cycles followed by rearomatization is described. A simple two-step, one-pot procedure for the sequence is also presented.

Supporting Information

 
  • References and Notes

  • 1 Lovering F, Bikker J, Humblet C. J. Med. Chem. 2009; 52: 6752
  • 2 Harden DB, Mokrosz MJ, Strekowski L. J. Org. Chem. 1988; 53: 4137
  • 3 De Bie DA, Nagel A, Van Der Plas HC, Geurtsen G, Koudijs A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979; 649
  • 4 Higashino T, Ito I, Hayashi E. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1972; 1544
    • 5a Higashino T, Ito H, Watanabe M, Hayashi E. J. Pharm. Soc. Jpn. 1973; 94
    • 5b Elderfield RC, Serlin I. J. Org. Chem. 1951; 16: 1669
    • 5c Mizuno Y, Adachi K, Ikeda K. J. Pharm. Soc. Jpn. 1954; 225
    • 6a Klapars A, Waldman JH, Campos KR, Jensen MS, McLaughlin M, Chung JY. L, Cvetovich RJ, Chen C. J. Org. Chem. 2005; 70: 10186
    • 6b Chang RK, Di Marco CN, Pitts DR, Greshock TJ, Kuduk SD. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009; 6303
  • 7 Stevens RV, Chapman KT, Weller HN. J. Org. Chem. 1980; 45: 2030
  • 8 Liao X, Lin L, Lu J, Wang C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010; 3859
  • 9 Liu Z, Yu W, Yang L, Liu Z. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007; 5321
  • 10 Xia JJ, Wang GW. Synthesis 2005; 2379
    • 11a Zeynizadeh B, Dilmaghani KA, Roozijoy A. J. Chin. Chem. Soc. (Weinheim, Ger.) 2005; 52: 1001
    • 11b Yadav JS, Reddy S, Sabitha G, Reddy GS. K. K. Synthesis 2000; 1532
    • 12a Karade NN, Gampawar SV, Kondre JM, Tiwari GB. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008; 6698
    • 12b Kumar P, Kumar A, Hussain K. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2012; 729
    • 12c Nicolaou KC, Mathison CJ. N, Montagnon T. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003; 42: 4077
    • 12d Yadav JS, Reddy BV. S, Basak AK, Baishya G, Narsaiah AV. Synthesis 2006; 45
  • 13 Shanmugam P, Perumal PT. Tetrahedron 2006; 9726
  • 14 Yamamoto K, Chen YG, Buono F. Org. Lett. 2005; 7: 4673
  • 15 Bagley MC, Lubinu MC. Synthesis 2006; 1283
  • 16 General Procedure: 1-(Quinazolin-4-yl)-cyclohexanecarbonitrile (Table 3 Entry 1) To a solution of cyclohexanecarbonitrile (146 μL, 1.2 mmol, 1.2 equiv) in THF (5 mL) at –78 °C was added LiHMDS (1.2 mL of 1 M in THF, 1.2 mmol, 1.2 equiv) dropwise and stirred at –78 °C for 5 min. Quinazoline (130 mg, 1.0 mmol, 1.0 equiv) was added, the cooling bath was removed, and the reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h. Solid KMnO4 (316 mg, 2 mmol, 2 equiv) and MeCN (1 mL) were added, and the reaction mixture was stirred at r.t. until the reaction was complete (as judged by LC–MS analysis, in this case 4.5 h). The reaction mixture was poured into sat. aq NaHCO3 and extracted with EtOAc (3×). The organic layers were combined, washed with brine, dried (Na2SO4), filtered, and evaporated to dryness. The crude residue was purified by silica gel flash chromatography (12 g silica, 0–40% EtOAc in hexanes) to yield 1-(quinazolin-4-yl)cyclohexane-carbonitrile as a white solid (222 mg, 94% yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 9.29 (s, 1 H), 8.70 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1 H), 8.13 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.94 (ddd, J = 8.4, 6.9, 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 7.72 (ddd, J = 8.4, 6.9, 1.3 Hz, 1 H), 2.52 (d, J = 12.3 Hz, 2 H), 2.17–2.08 (m, 2 H), 2.02–1.95 (m, 4 H), 1.93–1.87 (m, 1 H), 1.40–1.28 (m, 1 H) ppm. 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 166.61, 153.75, 151.05, 133.79, 130.02, 127.89, 124.73, 122.31, 121.92, 44.40, 35.58, 25.06, 22.97 ppm.
  • 17 Yin Z, Zhang Z, Kadow JF, Meanwell NA, Wang T. J. Org. Chem. 2004; 69: 1364
  • 18 We speculate that the ease of enolate formation may be why dehydrogenation was not observed under these conditions (Scheme 3). Alternatively, as pointed out by a reviewer, the ester intermediate can adopt a six-membered transition state that could facilitate the reverse process (Scheme 4).