Download PDF
Zahnmedizin up2date 2013; 7(5): 429-447
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1325027
Endodontologie
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Ultraschall in der Endodontie

Mauro Amato
,
Hanjo Hecker
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
08 October 2013 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Einleitung

Ultraschallinstrumente finden einen weiten Einsatz in der heutigen Zahnmedizin. Im täglichen Gebrauch werden sie in der Parodontologie zur Reinigung der Wurzeloberfläche, in der Kariologie zur Kavitätenpräparation, in der Prothetik zum Finieren von Präparationsrändern und in der Chirurgie als Piezoinstrumente angewendet. Auch in der Endodontie haben sie ihre Anwendungsbereiche gefunden. Zusammen mit dem Dentalmikroskop und rotierenden oder alternierenden NiTi-Feilen sind Ultraschallinstrumente Teil einer modernen Wurzelkanalbehandlung.

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Street EV. A critical evaluation of ultrasonics in dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1959; 9: 132-141
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Johnson W, Wilson JR. Application of the ultrasonic dental unit to scaling procedures. J Periodontol 1957; 28: 264-271
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Martin H. Ultrasonic disinfection of the root canal. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1976; 42: 92-99
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Stock CJ. Current status of the use of ultrasound in endodontics. Int Dent J 1991; 41: 175-182
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Martin H, Cunningham W. Endosonic endodontics: the ultrasonic synergistic system. Int Dent J 1984; 34: 198-203
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Sequeira P, Fedorowicz Z, Nasser M et al. Ultrasonic versus hand instrumentation for orthograde root canal treatment of permanent teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006384.
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Kim S. Modern endodontic practice: instruments and techniques. Dent Clin North Am 2004; 48: 1-9
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Amato M, Vanoni-Heineken I, Hecker H et al. Curved versus straight root canals: the benefit of activated irrigation techniques on dentin debris removal. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011; 111: 529-534
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Lee SJ, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. The effectiveness of syringe irrigation and ultrasonics to remove debris from simulated irregularities within prepared root canal walls. Int Endod J 2004; 37: 672-678
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Harrison AJ, Chivatxaranukul P, Parashos P et al. The effect of ultrasonically activated irrigation on reduction of Enterococcus faecalis in experimentally infected root canals. Int Endod J 2010; 43: 968-977
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11 van der Sluis LW, Versluis M, Wu MK et al. Passive ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: a review of the literature. Int Endod J 2007; 40: 415-426
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Ahmad M, Pitt Ford TR, Crum LA. Ultrasonic debridement of root canals: an insight into the mechanisms involved. J Endod 1987; 13: 93-101
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ahmad M. Measurements of temperature generated by ultrasonic file in vitro. Endod Dent Traumatol 1990; 6: 230-231
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Ahmad M, Pitt Ford TJ, Crum LA. Ultrasonic debridement of root canals: acoustic streaming and its possible role. J Endod 1987; 13: 490-499
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Cameron JA. The effect of ultrasonic endodontics on the temperature of the root canal wall. J Endod 1988; 14: 554-559
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Jiang LM, Verhaagen B, Versluis M et al. The influence of the ultrasonic intensity on the cleaning efficacy of passive ultrasonic irrigation. J Endod 2011; 37: 688-692
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Boutsioukis C, Gogos C, Verhaagen B et al. The effect of apical preparation size on irrigant flow in root canals evaluated using an unsteady Computational Fluid Dynamics model. Int Endod J 2010; 43: 874-881
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Boutsioukis C, Gogos C, Verhaagen B et al. The effect of root canal taper on the irrigant flow: evaluation using an unsteady Computational Fluid Dynamics model. Int Endod J 2010; 43: 909-916
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Vera J, Hernandez EM, Romero M et al. Effect of maintaining apical patency on irrigant penetration into the apical two millimeters of large root canals: an in vivo study. J Endod 2012; 38: 1340-1343
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 20 van der Sluis LW, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. A comparison between a smooth wire and a K-file in removing artificially placed dentine debris from root canals in resin blocks during ultrasonic irrigation. Int Endod J 2005; 38: 593-596
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Lumley PJ, Walmsley AD. Effect of precurving on the performance of endosonic K files. J Endod 1992; 18: 232-236
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Ma J, Al-Ashaw AJ, Shen Y et al. Efficacy of ProTaper Universal Rotary Retreatment system for gutta-percha removal from oval root canals: a micro-computed tomography study. J Endod 2012; 38: 1516-1520
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Nehme WB. Elimination of intracanal metallic obstructions by abrasion using an operational microscope and ultrasonics. J Endod 2001; 27: 365-367
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Ruddle CJ. Nonsurgical retreatment. J Endod 2004; 30: 827-845
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Eriksson A, Albrektsson T, Grane B et al. Thermal injury to bone. A vital-microscopic description of heat effects. Int J Oral Surg 1982; 11: 115-121
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Huttula AS, Tordik PA, Imamura G et al. The effect of ultrasonic post instrumentation on root surface temperature. J Endod 2006; 32: 1085-1087
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Budd JC, Gekelman D, White JM. Temperature rise of the post and on the root surface during ultrasonic post removal. Int Endod J 2005; 38: 705-711
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Garrido AD, Fonseca TS, Alfredo E et al. Influence of ultrasound, with and without water spray cooling, on removal of posts cemented with resin or zinc phosphate cements. J Endod 2004; 30: 173-176
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Spili P, Parashos P, Messer HH. The impact of instrument fracture on outcome of endodontic treatment. J Endod 2005; 31: 845-850
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Panitvisai P, Parunnit P, Sathorn C et al. Impact of a retained instrument on treatment outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod 2010; 36: 775-780
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Hulsmann M. Methods for removing metal obstructions from the root canal. Endod Dent Traumatol 1993; 9: 223-237
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Hulsmann M, Schinkel I. Influence of several factors on the success or failure of removal of fractured instruments from the root canal. Endod Dent Traumatol 1999; 15: 252-258
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Shen Y, Peng B, Cheung GS. Factors associated with the removal of fractured NiTi instruments from root canal systems. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004; 98: 605-610
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Souter NJ, Messer HH. Complications associated with fractured file removal using an ultrasonic technique. J Endod 2005; 31: 450-452
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Garip H, Garip Y, Orucoglu H et al. Effect of the angle of apical resection on apical leakage, measured with a computerized fluid filtration device. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011; 111: e50-e55
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Gagliani M, Taschieri S, Molinari R. Ultrasonic root-end preparation: influence of cutting angle on the apical seal. J Endod 1998; 24: 726-730
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Gilheany PA, Figdor D, Tyas MJ. Apical dentin permeability and microleakage associated with root end resection and retrograde filling. J Endod 1994; 20: 22-26
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Saunders WP, Saunders EM, Gutmann JL. Ultrasonic root-end preparation, Part 2. Microleakage of EBA root-end fillings. Int Endod J 1994; 27: 325-329
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Morgan LA, Marshall JG. A scanning electron microscopic study of in vivo ultrasonic root-end preparations. J Endod 1999; 25: 567-570
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Lin CP, Chou HG, Kuo JC et al. The quality of ultrasonic root-end preparation: a quantitative study. J Endod 1998; 24: 666-670
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Wuchenich G, Meadows D, Torabinejad M. A comparison between two root end preparation techniques in human cadavers. J Endod 1994; 20: 279-282
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Rahbaran S, Gilthorpe MS, Harrison SD et al. Comparison of clinical outcome of periapical surgery in endodontic and oral surgery units of a teaching dental hospital: a retrospective study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001; 91: 700-709
    Google Scholar
  • 43 von Arx T, Jensen SS, Hanni S et al. Five-year longitudinal assessment of the prognosis of apical microsurgery. J Endod 2012; 38: 570-579
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Barone C, Dao TT, Basrani BB et al. Treatment outcome in endodontics: the Toronto study-phases 3, 4, and 5: apical surgery. J Endod 2010; 36: 28-35
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Tsesis I, Faivishevsky V, Kfir A et al. Outcome of surgical endodontic treatment performed by a modern technique: a meta-analysis of literature. J Endod 2009; 35: 1505-1511
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Setzer FC, Shah SB, Kohli MR et al. Outcome of endodontic surgery: a meta-analysis of the literature-part 1: Comparison of traditional root-end surgery and endodontic microsurgery. J Endod 2010; 36: 1757-1765
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Bailey GC, Ng YL, Cunnington SA et al. Root canal obturation by ultrasonic condensation of gutta-percha. Part II: an in vitro investigation of the quality of obturation. Int Endod J 2004; 37: 694-698
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Deitch AK, Liewehr FR, West LA et al. A comparison of fill density obtained by supplementing cold lateral condensation with ultrasonic condensation. J Endod 2002; 28: 665-667
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Yeung P, Liewehr FR, Moon PC. A quantitative comparison of the fill density of MTA produced by two placement techniques. J Endod 2006; 32: 456-459
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar