Synlett 2013; 24(1): 65-68
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1317694
letter
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Application of a Stereoselective Rhodium(II)-Catalyzed Oxonium Ylide Formation–[2,3]-Sigmatropic Rearrangement of an α-Diazo-β-keto Ester to the Synthesis of 2-epi-Cinatrin C1 Dimethyl Ester

Takayuki Yakura*
a   Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama, Sugitani, Toyama 930-0194, Japan   Fax: +81(76)4345053   Email: yakura@pha.u-toyama.ac.jp
,
Ayaka Ozono
a   Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama, Sugitani, Toyama 930-0194, Japan   Fax: +81(76)4345053   Email: yakura@pha.u-toyama.ac.jp
,
Katsuaki Matsui
a   Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama, Sugitani, Toyama 930-0194, Japan   Fax: +81(76)4345053   Email: yakura@pha.u-toyama.ac.jp
,
Masayuki Yamashita
b   Kyoto Pharmaceutical University, Misasagi, Yamashina, Kyoto 607-8412, Japan
,
Tomoya Fujiwara
a   Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama, Sugitani, Toyama 930-0194, Japan   Fax: +81(76)4345053   Email: yakura@pha.u-toyama.ac.jp
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 17 October 2012

Accepted after revision: 05 November 2012

Publication Date:
27 November 2012 (online)

 


Abstract

The Rh2(OAc)4-catalyzed oxonium ylide formation–[2,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement of a highly functionalized α-diazo-β-keto ester derived from d-glucose proceeded stereoselectively to give the corresponding tetrahydrofuran-3-one as a single diastereomer in high yield. This reaction was applied to the synthesis of 2-epi-cinatrin C1 dimethyl ester as a key step.


#

Metal carbenes derived from α-diazocarbonyl compounds are highly electrophilic and react with an available Lewis base to form an ylide. When the resulting ylide has an allylic substituent at the proper position, a subsequent [2,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement takes place. Such metal-catalyzed carbenoid reactions have become a powerful tool for the synthesis of functionalized cyclic compounds including oxacycles.[ 1 ] We recently reported a stereoselective copper-catalyzed oxonium ylide formation–[2,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement reaction of an α-diazo ketone to give 2,6-trans-dihydropyran-3-one[ 2 ] and a rhodium(II)-catalyzed reaction of α-diazo-β-keto esters leading to 3-oxotetrahydrofurans.[ 3 ]

A family of cinatrins, which were isolated from the fermentation broth of the microorganism Circinotrichum falcatisporum RF-641 by Itazaki and co-workers, possess phospholipase A2 inhibitory activity.[ 4 ] Among them, the cinatrins A and B have a unique spirolactone skeleton as a key structural component, whereas cinatrin C1 (1) contains a highly substituted γ-lactone framework that appears to be a ring-opened derivative of cinatrin B (Figure [1]). The stereoselective construction of substituted γ-lactones with three continuous stereocenters is one of the most important issues for the synthesis of these attractive bioactive compounds.[ 5 ]

Here we report the stereoselective rhodium(II)-catalyzed oxonium ylide formation–[2,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement of α-diazo-β-keto ester 4 derived from d-glucose and its application to the synthesis of 2-epi-cinatrin C1 dimethyl ester 2.

The outline of our synthesis of cinatrins is illustrated in Scheme [1]. Cinatrins are generated from a key intermediate, a substituted tetrahydrofuran-3-one 3, by (a) oxidation to a lactone, (b) introduction of the C1 unit, and (c) extension of the side chain. Furanone 3 is stereoselectively synthesized from α-diazo-β-keto ester 4 by using the rhodium(II)-catalyzed oxonium ylide formation–[2,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement. The diazoketo ester 4 is easily prepared from d-glucose.

Zoom Image
Figure 1 Cinatrin family
Zoom Image
Scheme 1 Retrosynthetic analysis of cinatrins

We started our synthesis from d-glucose (Scheme [2]). According to the reported procedure,[ 6 ] diol 5 was prepared from d-glucose in two steps. The selective protection of the primary alcohol by a pivaloyl (Piv) group followed by allylation of the remaining secondary alcohol gave 6. The benzylidene diol protecting group was changed to a tert-butyldimethylsilyl (TBS) group, leading to bis-TBS ether 7. The removal of the Piv group by diisobutylaluminum hydride (DIBAL-H) reduction, oxidation to the aldehyde, and subsequent β-keto ester formation with methyl diazoacetate in the presence of tin(II) chloride gave keto ester 8. Subsequently, a diazo transfer reaction converted 8 to α-diazo-β-keto ester 4.

Zoom Image
Scheme 2 Reagents and conditions: (a) t-BuCOCl, pyridine, DMAP, CH2Cl2, r.t., 1.5 h, 97%; (b) allyl bromide, Ag2O, CaSO4, benzene, r.t., 39 h, 90%; (c) CSA, MeOH, r.t., 18.5 h, 89%; (d) TBSOTf, i-Pr2NEt, CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 20 min, 99%; (e) DIBAL-H, CH2Cl2, –80 °C, 30 min, 89%; (f) Dess–Martin periodinane, CH2Cl2, r.t., 1.5 h, 92%; (g) N2CHCO2Me, SnCl2, CH2Cl2, r.t., 5.5 h, 75%; (h) TsN3, Et3N, MeCN, r.t., 4 h, 96%.

Next, we examined the rhodium(II)-catalyzed reaction of 4, a key step of our cinatrin synthetic plan (Scheme [3]). We recently reported that the rhodium(II)-catalyzed reaction of 5-allyloxy-2-diazo-3-ketoesters gave methyl 5-substituted 2-allyl-3-oxotetrahydrofuran-2-carboxylates in high yields with excellent stereoselectivities.[ 3 ] According to the reported procedure,[ 3 ] 4 was treated with 3 mol% of dirhodium(II) tetraacetate [Rh2(OAc)4] in dichloromethane under reflux for eight hours. The reaction smoothly proceeded to give tetrahydrofuran-3-one 3 as a single diastereomer in 79% yield.[ 7 ] The reduction of 3 with sodium borohydride produced alcohol 9, which was esterified with 4-nitrobenzoyl chloride to give a crystalline product, ester 10.[ 8 ] The X-ray analysis of 10 confirmed the trans relationship between the 5-silyloxymethyl and 2-allyl groups and showed the 3,4-cis stereochemistry. This indicated that the rhodium(II)-catalyzed reaction proceeds via oxonium ylide A, which is apparently a more stable intermediate than B, and that the subsequent [2,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement of the allyl group from oxygen to carbon formed 3, consistent with our previously reported stereoselectivity for the reaction of 5-allyloxy-2-diazo-3-ketoesters (Scheme [4]). In the subsequent reduction, the hydride should attack the carbonyl group from the α-side to avoid the adjacent bulky α-TBDMSO group of ketone to give β-hydroxy compound 9.

Zoom Image
Scheme 3 Reagents and conditions: (a) NaBH4, CH2Cl2–MeOH, –80 °C, 10 min, 92%; (b) 4-nitrobenzoyl chloride, Et3N, DMAP, CH2Cl2, r.t., 1.5 h, 88%.
Zoom Image
Scheme 4 Stereochemical preferences for rhodium(II)-catalyzed reaction of 4 and the following reduction

The excellent stereoselectivity of the NaBH4 reduction of 3 encouraged us to synthesize 2-epi-cinatrin C1 in order to prove the utility of our strategy for the synthesis of cinatrin derivatives (Scheme [5]). The chain extension of the allyl group using olefin metathesis with Grubbs’ second generation catalyst and 1-undecene gave (E)-alkene 11 [ 9 ] that was reduced to an alkyl group to give 12 in 91% yield in two steps. The nucleophilic addition of a vinyl group to 12 by using vinylmagnesium bromide exclusively produced α-vinyl adduct 13. This addition displayed the same stereoselectivity as that observed in the reduction of 3. The stereochemistry of 13 was confirmed by the subsequent formation of the acetonide of 15. The vinyl group was next converted to a methoxycarbonyl moiety by the usual three-step protocol to afford 14. The removal of the two silyl groups gave triol 15, and the subsequent formation of the acetonide of the cis-diol produced 16. Oxidation of 16 to lactone 17 was achieved by Taber’s procedure,[ 10 ] whereby the treatment of 16 with pyridinium dichromate (PDC) and acetic anhydride in CH2Cl2N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) under reflux resulted in 17. The final deprotection of the acetonide to diol was troublesome because the typical acidic conditions were not suitable for this transformation. However, the deprotection was achieved by the treatment of 17 with iodine in methanol[ 11 ] under reflux to give 2-epi-cinatrin C1 dimethyl ester 2 [12] [13] in 84% yield.

Zoom Image
Scheme 5 Reagents and conditions: (a) 1-undecene, Grubbs’ second-generation catalyst, CH2Cl2, reflux, 1 h, 96%; (b) 3 atm H2, Pd/C, EtOH, r.t., 3 h, 95%; (c) vinylmagnesium bromide, THF, –80 °C, 20 min, 85%; (d) O3, Me2S, CH2Cl2–MeOH, –78 °C, 10 min; (e) NaClO2, NaH2PO4·H2O, t-BuOH–2-methylbut-2-ene–H2O, r.t., 1 h; (f) excess CH2N2, Et2O, r.t., 15 min, 82% for 3 steps; (g) concd HCl, MeOH, r.t., 1.5 h, 92%; (h) 2,2-dimethoxypropane, TsOH, 60 °C, 1.5 h, 91%; (i) PDC, Ac2O, CH2Cl2–DMF, reflux, 1.5 h, 71%; (j) I2, MeOH, reflux, 45 h, 84%.

In conclusion, the Rh2(OAc)4-catalyzed oxonium ylide formation–[2,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement reaction of α-diazo-β-keto ester 4 derived from d-glucose stereoselectively proceeded to give tetrahydrofuran-3-one 3 as a single diastereomer in high yield. The resulting 3 was converted into 2-epi-cinatrin C1 dimethyl ester 2. As our results have demonstrated the utility of our strategy for the construction of the core structure of cinatrin derivatives, the stereoselective introduction of the C1 unit at the 2-positon from the β-side and the total synthesis of cinatrin C1 and its derivatives are now in progress.


#
  • References

    • 1a Doyle MP, McKervey MA, Ye T In Modern Catalytic Methods for Organic Synthesis with Diazo Compounds . John Wiley & Sons; New York: 1998
    • 1b For a review, see: Merlic CA, Zechman AL. Synthesis 2003; 1137
  • 2 Yakura T, Muramatsu W, Uenishi J. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2005; 53: 989
  • 3 Yakura T, Matsui K, Matsuzaka K, Yamashita M. Heterocycles 2009; 79: 353
    • 4a Itazaki H, Nagashima K, Kawamura Y, Matsumoto K, Nakai H, Terui Y. J. Antibiot. 1992; 45: 38
    • 4b Tanaka K, Itazaki H, Yoshida T. J. Antibiot. 1992; 45: 50
    • 5a Evans DA, Trotter BW, Barrow JC. Tetrahedron 1997; 53: 8779
    • 5b Cuzzupe AN, Florio RD, Rizzacasa MA. J. Org. Chem. 2002; 67: 4392
    • 5c Cuzzupe AN, Florio RD, White JM, Rizzacasa MA. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003; 1: 3572
  • 6 Tanabe G, Yoshikai K, Hatanaka T, Yamamoto M, Shao Y, Minematsu T, Muraoka O, Wang T, Matsuda H, Yoshikawa M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2007; 15: 3926
  • 7 Rhodium(II)-Catalyzed Reaction of α-Diazo-β-keto Ester 4: To a solution of Rh2(OAc)4 (17 mg, 0.038 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (40 mL) was added a solution of 4 (618 mg, 1.27 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (24 mL). The resulting solution was refluxed for 8 h. After concentration of the reaction, the residue was purified by column chromatography on SiO2 (5% EtOAc in hexane) to give 3 (459 mg, 79%) as a colorless oil; [α]D 26 +12.9 (c = 0.750, CHCl3). IR (neat): 1781, 1753 cm–1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 0.09 (s, 6 H), 0.11 (s, 3 H), 0.18 (s, 3 H), 0.90 (s, 9 H), 0.91 (s, 9 H), 2.61–2.81 (m, 2 H), 3.72 (s, 3 H), 3.82 (dd, J = 11.8, 3.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.91 (ddd, J = 8.9, 3.0, 2.1 Hz, 1 H), 4.00 (dd, J = 11.8, 2.1 Hz, 1 H), 4.57 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1 H), 5.11–5.21 (m, 2 H), 5.67–5.81 (m, 1 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = –5.5, –5.4, –5.3, –4.4, 18.2, 18.3, 25.6 (3), 25.8 (3), 38.4, 52.8, 61.3, 72.3, 80.2, 84.8, 120.2, 130.7, 167.6, 208.6. MS: m/z = 459 [M+ + H]. HRMS (EI): m/z calcd for C22H43O6Si2: 459.2598; found: 459.2578.
  • 8 Spectroscopic data for 10: colorless crystals; mp 86–88 °C (from 5% EtOAc in hexane); [α]D 21 −30.8° (c = 0.5, CHCl3). IR (neat): 1740, 1531 cm–1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = −0.04 (s, 3 H), 0.06 (s, 3 H), 0.09 (s, 3 H), 0.10 (s, 3 H), 0.74 (s, 9 H), 0.91 (s, 9 H), 2.74 (dd, J = 14.0, 7.4 Hz, 1 H), 2.89 (dd, J = 13.6, 7.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.70 (dd, J = 11.8, 4.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.73 (s, 3 H), 3.81 (dd, J = 11.3, 3.3 Hz, 1 H), 4.08 (dt, J = 5.2, 3.3 Hz, 1 H), 4.52 (t, J = 4.9 Hz, 1 H), 5.01–5.06 (m, 1 H), 5.08 (br s, 1 H), 5.64–5.79 (m, 1 H), 5.75 (d, J = 4.9 Hz, 1 H), 8.25 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2 H), 8.32 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = −5.53, −5.46, −5.1, −5.0, 17.7, 18.4, 25.5 (3), 25.9 (3), 38.4, 52.4, 62.4, 71.4, 84.9, 86.2, 119.0, 123.7, 130.8, 131.6, 135.2, 160.7, 163.5, 171.7. MS: m/z = 610 [M+ + H]. HRMS (EI): m/z calcd for C29H48O9NSi2: 610.2867; found: 610.2868. The X-ray data are now being deposited with the CCDC. CCDC-908929 (for 10) contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.�
  • 9 The coupling constant between the olefinic protons of 11 was observed to be 15.4 Hz.
    • 10a Taber DF, Song Y. J. Org. Chem. 1996; 61: 7508
    • 10b Kim JN, Ryu EK. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992; 33: 3141
  • 11 Szarek WA, Zamojski A, Tiwari KN, Ison ER. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986; 27: 3827
  • 12 Spectroscopic data for 2: a colorless oil; [α]D 18 −35.1° (c = 0.750, CHCl3). IR (neat): 3462, 1806, 1748 cm–1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 0.88 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 3 H), 1.25 (br s, 20 H), 1.92 (ddd, J = 14.0, 11.8, 4.4 Hz, 1 H), 2.08 (ddd, J = 14.0, 11.8, 4.4 Hz, 1 H), 2.93 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1 H), 3.79 (s, 3 H), 3.86 (s, 3 H), 3.89 (br s, 1 H), 4.99 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 14.1, 22.6, 23.2, 29.3, 29.4, 29.56, 29.60, 30.7, 31.9, 53.3, 54.0, 71.3, 81.3, 89.2, 168.9, 169.1, 172.7. MS: m/z = 402 [M+]. HRMS (EI): m/z calcd for C20H34O8: 402.2254; found: 402.2234.
  • 13 Unfortunately, the treatment of 2 with aqueous sodium hydroxide according to Rizzacasa’s cinatrin syntheses (see refs. 5a and 5b) gave a complex mixture. It is very interesting that the stereochemistry of the C-2 position strongly influenced its chemical stability.

  • References

    • 1a Doyle MP, McKervey MA, Ye T In Modern Catalytic Methods for Organic Synthesis with Diazo Compounds . John Wiley & Sons; New York: 1998
    • 1b For a review, see: Merlic CA, Zechman AL. Synthesis 2003; 1137
  • 2 Yakura T, Muramatsu W, Uenishi J. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2005; 53: 989
  • 3 Yakura T, Matsui K, Matsuzaka K, Yamashita M. Heterocycles 2009; 79: 353
    • 4a Itazaki H, Nagashima K, Kawamura Y, Matsumoto K, Nakai H, Terui Y. J. Antibiot. 1992; 45: 38
    • 4b Tanaka K, Itazaki H, Yoshida T. J. Antibiot. 1992; 45: 50
    • 5a Evans DA, Trotter BW, Barrow JC. Tetrahedron 1997; 53: 8779
    • 5b Cuzzupe AN, Florio RD, Rizzacasa MA. J. Org. Chem. 2002; 67: 4392
    • 5c Cuzzupe AN, Florio RD, White JM, Rizzacasa MA. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003; 1: 3572
  • 6 Tanabe G, Yoshikai K, Hatanaka T, Yamamoto M, Shao Y, Minematsu T, Muraoka O, Wang T, Matsuda H, Yoshikawa M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2007; 15: 3926
  • 7 Rhodium(II)-Catalyzed Reaction of α-Diazo-β-keto Ester 4: To a solution of Rh2(OAc)4 (17 mg, 0.038 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (40 mL) was added a solution of 4 (618 mg, 1.27 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (24 mL). The resulting solution was refluxed for 8 h. After concentration of the reaction, the residue was purified by column chromatography on SiO2 (5% EtOAc in hexane) to give 3 (459 mg, 79%) as a colorless oil; [α]D 26 +12.9 (c = 0.750, CHCl3). IR (neat): 1781, 1753 cm–1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 0.09 (s, 6 H), 0.11 (s, 3 H), 0.18 (s, 3 H), 0.90 (s, 9 H), 0.91 (s, 9 H), 2.61–2.81 (m, 2 H), 3.72 (s, 3 H), 3.82 (dd, J = 11.8, 3.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.91 (ddd, J = 8.9, 3.0, 2.1 Hz, 1 H), 4.00 (dd, J = 11.8, 2.1 Hz, 1 H), 4.57 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1 H), 5.11–5.21 (m, 2 H), 5.67–5.81 (m, 1 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = –5.5, –5.4, –5.3, –4.4, 18.2, 18.3, 25.6 (3), 25.8 (3), 38.4, 52.8, 61.3, 72.3, 80.2, 84.8, 120.2, 130.7, 167.6, 208.6. MS: m/z = 459 [M+ + H]. HRMS (EI): m/z calcd for C22H43O6Si2: 459.2598; found: 459.2578.
  • 8 Spectroscopic data for 10: colorless crystals; mp 86–88 °C (from 5% EtOAc in hexane); [α]D 21 −30.8° (c = 0.5, CHCl3). IR (neat): 1740, 1531 cm–1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = −0.04 (s, 3 H), 0.06 (s, 3 H), 0.09 (s, 3 H), 0.10 (s, 3 H), 0.74 (s, 9 H), 0.91 (s, 9 H), 2.74 (dd, J = 14.0, 7.4 Hz, 1 H), 2.89 (dd, J = 13.6, 7.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.70 (dd, J = 11.8, 4.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.73 (s, 3 H), 3.81 (dd, J = 11.3, 3.3 Hz, 1 H), 4.08 (dt, J = 5.2, 3.3 Hz, 1 H), 4.52 (t, J = 4.9 Hz, 1 H), 5.01–5.06 (m, 1 H), 5.08 (br s, 1 H), 5.64–5.79 (m, 1 H), 5.75 (d, J = 4.9 Hz, 1 H), 8.25 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2 H), 8.32 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = −5.53, −5.46, −5.1, −5.0, 17.7, 18.4, 25.5 (3), 25.9 (3), 38.4, 52.4, 62.4, 71.4, 84.9, 86.2, 119.0, 123.7, 130.8, 131.6, 135.2, 160.7, 163.5, 171.7. MS: m/z = 610 [M+ + H]. HRMS (EI): m/z calcd for C29H48O9NSi2: 610.2867; found: 610.2868. The X-ray data are now being deposited with the CCDC. CCDC-908929 (for 10) contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.�
  • 9 The coupling constant between the olefinic protons of 11 was observed to be 15.4 Hz.
    • 10a Taber DF, Song Y. J. Org. Chem. 1996; 61: 7508
    • 10b Kim JN, Ryu EK. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992; 33: 3141
  • 11 Szarek WA, Zamojski A, Tiwari KN, Ison ER. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986; 27: 3827
  • 12 Spectroscopic data for 2: a colorless oil; [α]D 18 −35.1° (c = 0.750, CHCl3). IR (neat): 3462, 1806, 1748 cm–1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 0.88 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 3 H), 1.25 (br s, 20 H), 1.92 (ddd, J = 14.0, 11.8, 4.4 Hz, 1 H), 2.08 (ddd, J = 14.0, 11.8, 4.4 Hz, 1 H), 2.93 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1 H), 3.79 (s, 3 H), 3.86 (s, 3 H), 3.89 (br s, 1 H), 4.99 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 14.1, 22.6, 23.2, 29.3, 29.4, 29.56, 29.60, 30.7, 31.9, 53.3, 54.0, 71.3, 81.3, 89.2, 168.9, 169.1, 172.7. MS: m/z = 402 [M+]. HRMS (EI): m/z calcd for C20H34O8: 402.2254; found: 402.2234.
  • 13 Unfortunately, the treatment of 2 with aqueous sodium hydroxide according to Rizzacasa’s cinatrin syntheses (see refs. 5a and 5b) gave a complex mixture. It is very interesting that the stereochemistry of the C-2 position strongly influenced its chemical stability.

Zoom Image
Figure 1 Cinatrin family
Zoom Image
Scheme 1 Retrosynthetic analysis of cinatrins
Zoom Image
Scheme 2 Reagents and conditions: (a) t-BuCOCl, pyridine, DMAP, CH2Cl2, r.t., 1.5 h, 97%; (b) allyl bromide, Ag2O, CaSO4, benzene, r.t., 39 h, 90%; (c) CSA, MeOH, r.t., 18.5 h, 89%; (d) TBSOTf, i-Pr2NEt, CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 20 min, 99%; (e) DIBAL-H, CH2Cl2, –80 °C, 30 min, 89%; (f) Dess–Martin periodinane, CH2Cl2, r.t., 1.5 h, 92%; (g) N2CHCO2Me, SnCl2, CH2Cl2, r.t., 5.5 h, 75%; (h) TsN3, Et3N, MeCN, r.t., 4 h, 96%.
Zoom Image
Scheme 3 Reagents and conditions: (a) NaBH4, CH2Cl2–MeOH, –80 °C, 10 min, 92%; (b) 4-nitrobenzoyl chloride, Et3N, DMAP, CH2Cl2, r.t., 1.5 h, 88%.
Zoom Image
Scheme 4 Stereochemical preferences for rhodium(II)-catalyzed reaction of 4 and the following reduction
Zoom Image
Scheme 5 Reagents and conditions: (a) 1-undecene, Grubbs’ second-generation catalyst, CH2Cl2, reflux, 1 h, 96%; (b) 3 atm H2, Pd/C, EtOH, r.t., 3 h, 95%; (c) vinylmagnesium bromide, THF, –80 °C, 20 min, 85%; (d) O3, Me2S, CH2Cl2–MeOH, –78 °C, 10 min; (e) NaClO2, NaH2PO4·H2O, t-BuOH–2-methylbut-2-ene–H2O, r.t., 1 h; (f) excess CH2N2, Et2O, r.t., 15 min, 82% for 3 steps; (g) concd HCl, MeOH, r.t., 1.5 h, 92%; (h) 2,2-dimethoxypropane, TsOH, 60 °C, 1.5 h, 91%; (i) PDC, Ac2O, CH2Cl2–DMF, reflux, 1.5 h, 71%; (j) I2, MeOH, reflux, 45 h, 84%.