J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2012; 73(02): 085-089
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1311692
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Transnasal Skull Base Reconstruction Using a 3-D Endoscope: Our First Impressions[*]

Paolo Castelnuovo
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
,
Paolo Battaglia
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
,
Mario Turri-Zanoni
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
,
Luca Volpi
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
,
Maurizio Bignami
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
,
Iacopo Dallan
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

12 July 2011

10 August 2011

Publication Date:
01 April 2012 (online)

Abstract

Nowadays endoscopic skull base reconstruction is safely and effectively performed by means of two-dimensional (2-D) endoscopic technique. The aim of our study is to compare our 2-D experience with the novel 3-D technology in the field of skull base reconstruction techniques. In this study four patients treated with various kinds of planned duraplasty are included. The new 3-D technology was compared with the high-definition 2-D scopes during the different steps of the procedures. The 3-D endoscopic skull base reconstruction obtained primary closure without complications in all cases. According to the subjective opinion of experienced endosurgeons, this novel technique improved depth perception, distance and size estimation, ability to identify specific anatomic structures, and hand–eye coordination. The main drawbacks detected were inferior sharpness, contrast and lighting that impaired the application of the technique in narrow sinonasal spaces. According to our preliminary impressions, 3-D endoscopic skull base reconstruction is an effective and safe procedure and could represent a significant advantage for accurate managing of the skull base region.

* This article was originally published online in Skull Base on November 30, 2011 (DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1296043)


 
  • References

  • 1 Kassam A, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH, Gardner P, Mintz A. Evolution of reconstructive techniques following endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches. Neurosurg Focus 2005; 19 (1) E8
  • 2 Locatelli D, Rampa F, Acchiardi I, Bignami M, De Bernardi F, Castelnuovo P. Endoscopic endonasal approaches for repair of cerebrospinal fluid leaks: nine-year experience. Neurosurgery 2006; 58 (4) , Suppl (Suppl. 02) ONS-246-ONS-256, ONS-256–257
  • 3 Castelnuovo PG, Delú G, Locatelli D , et al. Endonasal endoscopic duraplasty: our experience. Skull Base 2006; 16 (1) 19-24
  • 4 Villaret AB, Yakirevitch A, Bizzoni A , et al. Endoscopic transnasal craniectomy in the management of selected sinonasal malignancies. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2010; 24 (1) 60-65
  • 5 Castelnuovo P, Dallan I, Battaglia P, Bignami M. Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: past, present and future. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2010; 267 (5) 649-663
  • 6 Kassam AB, Prevedello DM, Carrau RL , et al. Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: analysis of complications in the authors' initial 800 patients. J Neurosurg 2011; 114 (6) 1544-1568
  • 7 Taffinder N, Smith SG, Huber J, Russell RC, Darzi A. The effect of a second-generation 3D endoscope on the laparoscopic precision of novices and experienced surgeons. Surg Endosc 1999; 13 (11) 1087-1092
  • 8 Roth J, Fraser JF, Singh A, Bernardo A, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Surgical approaches to the orbital apex: comparison of endoscopic endonasal and transcranial approaches using a novel 3D endoscope. Orbit 2011; 30 (1) 43-48
  • 9 Brown SM, Tabaee A, Singh A, Schwartz TH, Anand VK. Three-dimensional endoscopic sinus surgery: feasibility and technical aspects. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008; 138 (3) 400-402
  • 10 Tabaee A, Anand VK, Fraser JF, Brown SM, Singh A, Schwartz TH. Three-dimensional endoscopic pituitary surgery. Neurosurgery 2009; 64 (5) , Suppl (Suppl. 02) 288-293, discussion 294–295
  • 11 Wasserzug O, Margalit N, Weizman N, Fliss DM, Gil Z. Utility of a three-dimensional endoscopic system in skull base surgery. Skull Base 2010; 20 (4) 223-228
  • 12 Fraser JF, Allen B, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Three-dimensional neurostereoendoscopy: subjective and objective comparison to 2D. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2009; 52 (1) 25-31
  • 13 Hadad G, Bassagasteguy L, Carrau RL , et al. A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap. Laryngoscope 2006; 116 (10) 1882-1886
  • 14 Hegazy HM, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH, Kassam A, Zweig J. Transnasal endoscopic repair of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea: a meta-analysis. Laryngoscope 2000; 110 (7) 1166-1172
  • 15 Locatelli D, Vitali M, Custodi VM, Scagnelli P, Castelnuovo P, Canevari FR. Endonasal approaches to the sellar and parasellar regions: closure techniques using biomaterials. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2009; 151 (11) 1431-1437
  • 16 Castelnuovo P, Dallan I, Pistochini A, Battaglia P, Locatelli D, Bignami M. Endonasal endoscopic repair of Sternberg's canal cerebrospinal fluid leaks. Laryngoscope 2007; 117 (2) 345-349
  • 17 Castelnuovo P, Dallan I, Bignami M, Pistochini A, Battaglia P, Tschabitscher M. Endoscopic endonasal management of petroclival cerebrospinal fluid leaks: anatomical study and preliminary clinical experience. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2008; 51 (6) 336-339
  • 18 Way LW, Stewart L, Gantert W , et al. Causes and prevention of laparoscopic bile duct injuries: analysis of 252 cases from a human factors and cognitive psychology perspective. Ann Surg 2003; 237 (4) 460-469