Intrapartum Fetal Surveillance: Review of Three National Guidelines

Abstract

Evidence-based guidelines regarding intrapartum fetal surveillance from three countries (United States, Canada, and Australia/New Zealand) were reviewed. The similarities in the three national guidelines (purported etiology, management of periodic changes, and intermittent auscultation for low-risk women) are understandable. Differences in recommendations (role of fetal admission test, amnioinfusion for variable decelerations, scalp pH, umbilical arterial acid-base status, and education in interpretation of fetal heart tracing) are not explained. The likelihood of recommendations being categorized as level A differed for the countries: United States, 41% (7/17); Canada, 18% (3/17); and Australia and New Zealand, 17% (2/12). Only one publication was cited by all three guidelines. To avoid confusion and possibly enhance their quality, national guidelines should acknowledge the presence of others on the same topic, and if there are differences then provide explanations for dissimilarities.

Keywords

fetal heart rate monitoring - practice bulletin - guidelines - intrapartum

• References

• 1 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles. Practice Bulletin No. 106, 2009
• 2 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. Practice Bulletin No. 70, 2005
• 3 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. Practice Bulletin No. 62, 2005
• 4 Klagholz J, Strunk AL. Overview of the 2009 ACOG Survey on Professional Liability. Available at: http://www.acog.org/About_ACOG/ACOG_Departments/Profressional_Liability12009_Survery_Results/ . Accessed March 30, 2012
• 5 Chauhan SP, Gupta LM, Hendrix NW, Berghella V ; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Intrauterine growth restriction: comparison of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists practice bulletin with other national guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200: 409 , e1–e6
• 6 Chauhan SP, Gherman R, Hendrix NW, Bingham JM, Hayes E. Shoulder dystocia: comparison of the ACOG practice bulletin with another national guideline. Am J Perinatol 2010; 27: 129-136
• 7 Chauhan SP, Hendrix NW, Berghella V, Siddiqui D. Comparison of two national guidelines in obstetrics: American versus royal college of obstetricians and gynecologists. Am J Perinatol 2010; 27: 763-770
• 8 Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Fetal health surveillance: antepartum and intrapartum consensus. guideline, No. 197, 2007
• 9 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Intrapartum fetal surveillance: clinical guidelines, 2nd ed, . 2006
• 10 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The use of electronic fetal monitoring: the use and interpretation of cardiotocography in intrapartum surveillance. Evidence-based clinical guideline No. 8, 2001
• 11 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist. Management of Intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings. Practice Bulletin No. 116, 2010
• 12 National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Intrapartum care: care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth. Clinical Guideline 55, 2007
• 13 Bix E, Reiner LM, Klovning A, Oian P. Prognostic value of the labour admission test and its effectiveness compared with auscultation only: a systematic review. BJOG 2005; 112: 1595-1604
• 14 Hendrix NW, Chauhan SP, Scardo JA, Ellings JM, Devoe LD. Managing nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns before cesarean delivery. Compliance with ACOG recommendations. J Reprod Med 2000; 45: 995-999
• 15 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist. Umbilical cord blood gas and acid-base analysis. Committee Opinion No. 348, 2006 (Reaffirmed 2010)
• 16 Gilbert WM, Pitkin RM. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine meeting presentations: what gets published and why?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 32-35
• 17 Bloom SL, Spong CY, Thom E , et al; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Fetal pulse oximetry and cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 2195-2202
• 18 Clark SL, Gimovsky ML, Miller FC. The scalp stimulation test: a clinical alternative to fetal scalp blood sampling. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 148: 274-277
• 19 Skupski DW, Eglinton GS. Intrapartum fetal stimulation tests: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100: 830
• 20 Simpson KR, James DC. Efficacy of intrauterine resuscitation techniques in improving fetal oxygen status during labor. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105: 1362-1368
• 21 Kubli FW, Hon EH, Khazin AF, Takemura H. Observations on heart rate and pH in the human fetus during labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1969; 104: 1190-1206
• 22 Badawi N, Kurinczuk JJ, Keogh JM , et al. Intrapartum risk factors for newborn encephalopathy: the Western Australian case-control study. BMJ 1998; 317: 1554-1558
• 23 Kruger K, Hallberg B, Blennow M, Kublickas M, Westgren M. Predictive value of fetal scalp blood lactate concentration and pH as markers of neurologic disability. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181 (5 Pt 1) 1072-1078
• 24 Spencer JA, Badawi N, Burton P, Keogh J, Pemberton P, Stanley F. The intrapartum CTG prior to neonatal encephalopathy at term: a case-control study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 25-28
• 25 Chauhan SP, Roach H, Naef II RW, Magann EF, Morrison JC, Martin Jr JN. Cesarean section for suspected fetal distress. Does the decision-incision time make a difference?. J Reprod Med 1997; 42: 347-352
• 26 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The use of electronic fetal monitoring: the use and interpretation of cardiotocography in intrapartum fetal surveillance. Evidence-based Clinical Guideline No. 8. London, UK: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Press; 2001
• 27 Chen HY, Chauhan SP, Ananth CV, Vintzileos AM, Abuhamad AZ. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and its relationship to neonatal and infant mortality in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 204: 491 , e1–e10
• 28 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists committee descriptions Available at: http://www.acog.org/About_ACOG/Committee_Descriptions . Accessed March 30, 2012
• 29 Lalonde AB. Response to medical societies scramble to include disclosure on clinical guidelines CMAJ May 17, 2011 183:E443–E444; published May 24, 2011. Available at: http://www.cmaj.ca/content/183/8/E443/reply#cmaj_el_649664 . Accessed September 25, 2011
• 30 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Task Force on National Encephalopathy and Cerebral Palsy, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Academy of Pediatrics. Neonatal encephalopathy and cerebral palsy: Defining the pathogenesis and pathophysiology. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2003