Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2012; 137(14): 722-725
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1299012
Aktuelle Diagnostik & Therapie | Review article
Kardiologie
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Moderne Therapie des akuten Koronarsyndroms

Modern treatment in acute coronary syndrome
T. Bauer
1   Medizinische Klinik B, Herzzentrum Ludwigshafen
,
R. Zahn
1   Medizinische Klinik B, Herzzentrum Ludwigshafen
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

20 January 2012

08 March 2012

Publication Date:
27 March 2012 (online)

Zusammenenfassung

Unter dem Begriff „Akutes Koronarsyndrom“ (ACS) werden die Phasen der koronaren Herzerkrankung (KHK) zusammengefasst, die unmittelbar lebensbedrohlich sind. Beim ST-Hebungsinfarkt (STEMI) ist eine umgehende Reperfusionstherapie notwendig. Der Goldstandard ist hier die primäre perkutane Koronarintervention (PCI). Beim ACS ohne ST-Streckenhebung (NSTE-ACS) sollte bei Patienten mit Risikomerkmalen innerhalb von 72 Stunden eine Koronarangiographie durchgeführt werden. Je nach Koronarbefund wird der Patient mittels PCI, aorto-koronarer Bypasschirurgie oder rein medikamentös behandelt. Der antithrombozytären Therapie kommt beim ACS eine Schüsselrolle zu. Zusätzlich zur Acetylsalicylsäure (ASS) ist die Gabe eines weiteren Thrombozytenaggregationshemmers für 12 Monate indiziert. Für die Mehrheit der Patienten sind Ticagrelor und Prasugrel die Substanzen der ersten Wahl, da beide schneller und stärker wirken als Clopidogrel. Bei Patienten mit hohem Blutungsrisiko bleibt Clopidogrel aber der zu bevorzugende Plättchenhemmer. Neben der antithrombozytären Therapie ist beim ACS zudem eine antikoagulatorische Therapie notwendig.

Abstract

The „acute coronary syndrome“ (ACS) is a life threatening condition. In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) an immediate reperfusion therapy is indicated. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the gold standard. In ACS without ST-segment elevation (NSTE-ACS) coronary angiography should be performed within 72 hours in patients with risk factors. Depending on the coronary anatomy treatment options are PCI, aorto-coronary bypass surgery or sole medical therapy. The antiplatelet therapy has a key role in ACS. In addition to acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) another platelet aggregation inhibitor should be given for 12 months. For the majority of patients ticagrelor and prasugrel are the agents of first choice, because both act faster and stronger than clopidogrel. In patients at high risk of bleeding clopidogrel remains the preferable antiplatelet agent. In addition to antiplatelet treatment anticoagulant therapy is necessary in ACS-patients.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Antithrombotic Trialists' Collaboration. Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients. BMJ 2002; 324: 71-86
  • 2 Bauer T, Gitt AK, Zahn R et al. Guideline-recommended secondary prevention drug therapy after acute myocardial infarction: predictors and outcomes of nonadherence. Eur J Cardiov Prev Rehabil 2010; 17: 576-581
  • 3 ESC. Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2011; 32: 2999-3054
  • 4 Fibrinolytic Therapy Trialists' (FTT) Collaborative Group. Indications for fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction: collaborative overview of early mortality and major morbidity results from all randomised trials of more than 1000 patients. Lancet 1994; 343: 311-322
  • 5 Fox KA, Clayton TC, Damman P et al. Long-term outcome of a routine versus selective invasive strategy in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome a meta-analysis of individual patient data. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55: 2435-2445
  • 6 Gawaz M, Neumann FJ, Schomig A. Evaluation of platelet membrane glycoproteins in coronary artery disease: consequences for diagnosis and therapy. Circulation 1999; 99: E1-E11
  • 7 Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi nell'Infarto Miocardico (GISSI). Effectiveness of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 1986; 1: 397-402
  • 8 ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group. Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2. Lancet 1988; 2: 349-360
  • 9 Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet 2003; 361: 13-20
  • 10 Lenzen MJ, Boersma E, Bertrand ME et al. Management and outcome of patients with established coronary artery disease: the Euro Heart Survey on coronary revascularization. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 1169-1179
  • 11 Lip GY, Huber K, Andreotti F et al. Consensus Document of European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Thrombosis. Antithrombotic management of atrial fibrillation patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome and/or undergoing coronary stenting: executive summary – a Consensus Document of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Thrombosis, endorsed by the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J 2010; 3: 1311-1318
  • 12 Mehta SR, Yusuf S, Peters RJ et al. Clopidogrel in Unstable angina to prevent Recurrent Events trial (CURE) Investigators. Effects of pretreatment with clopidogrel and aspirin followed by long-term therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the PCI-CURE study. Lancet 2001; 358: 527-533
  • 13 Montalescot G, Cayla G, Collet JP et al. Immediate vs delayed intervention for acute coronary syndromes: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2009; 302: 947-954
  • 14 Van de Werf F, Bax J, Betriu A et al. Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation: the Task Force on the Management of ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2008; 29: 2909-2945
  • 15 Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A et al. PLATO Investigators. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 1045-1057
  • 16 Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH et al. TRITON-TIMI 38 Investigators. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2001-2015
  • 17 Granger CB, Goldberg RJ, Dabbous O et al. Predictors of hospital mortality in the global registry of acute coronary events. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163: 2345-2353