Download PDF
Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie up2date 2012; 7(2): 83-95
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1298377
Wirbelsäule
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Bandscheibenendoprothetik und andere bewegungserhaltende Stabilisierungsverfahren der Lendenwirbelsäule – klinische Aspekte

Teil 1
W. Käfer
1   Abteilung für Wirbelsäulenchirurgie, Westpfalz-Klinikum GmbH
,
B. Cakir
2   Orthopädische Universitätsklinik Ulm am RKU
,
H.-J. Wilke
3   Institut für Unfallchirurgische Forschung und Biomechanik, Universität Ulm
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
28 March 2012 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Die vorliegende Arbeit stellt dorsale und ventrale bewegungserhaltende Stabilisierungsverfahren der Lendenwirbelsäule dar. In ersten Teil wird ein Überblick über die zugrunde liegenden Krankheitsbilder der lumbalen Degeneration und damit einhergehend die Indikationsstellung und Patientenselektion gelegt.

Im zweiten Teil werden die Rationale sowie klinische und radiologische Ergebnisse lumbaler Bandscheibenprothesen, pedikelbasierter dorsaler dynamischer Stabilisierungssystemen, interspinöser Platzhalter und des Facettengelenk- sowie Nukleusersatz dargestellt.

 

  • Quellenangaben

  • Adams MA, Dolan P, Hutton WC. The stages of disc degeneration as revealed by discograms. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1986; 68: 36-41
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Adams MA, Roughley PJ. What is intervertebral disc degeneration, and what causes it?. Spine 2006; 31: 2151-2161
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Bono CM, Lee CK. Critical analysis of trends in fusion for degenerative disc disease over the past 20 years: Influence of technique on fusion rate and clinical outcome. Spine 2004; 29: 455-463
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Boos N, Weissbach S, Rohrbach H et al. Classification of age-related changes in lumbar intervertebral discs: 2002 Volvo Award in basic science. Spine 2002; 27: 2631-2644
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Eubanks JD, Lee MJ, Cassinelli E et al. Prevalence of lumbar facet arthrosis and its relationship to age, sex, and race: an anatomic study of cadaveric specimens. Spine 2007; 32: 2058-2062
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Fujiwara A, Tamai K, Yamato M et al. The relationship between facet joint osteoarthritis and disc degeneration of the lumbar spine: an MRI study. Eur Spine J 1999; 8: 396-401
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Garfin SR, Herkowitz HN, Mirkovic S. Spinal stenosis. Instr Course Lect 2000; 49: 361-374
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Kirkaldy-Willis WH, Farfan HF. Instability of the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop 1982; 165: 110-123
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Krämer J. Mikrochirurgie der Wirbelsäule. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2004
    Google Scholar
  • Malmivaara A, Slätis P, Heliövaara M et al. Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? A randomized controlled trial. Spine 2007; 32: 1-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Marchetti PG, Bartolozzi P. Classification of spondylolisthesis as a guidance for treatment. In: DeWald RL, Bridwell KH, Hrsg. The Textbook of Spinal Surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott Wilkins & Williams; 1997: 1211-1254
    Google Scholar
  • Martin CR, Gruszczynski AT, Braunsfurth HA et al. The surgical management of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review. Spine 2007; 32: 1791-1798
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Meyerding HW. Spondylolisthesis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1932; 54: 371-377
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Modic MT, Masaryk TJ, Ross JS, Carter JR. Imaging of degenerative disk disease. Radiology 1988; 168: 177-186
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Mooney V, Robertson J. The facet syndrome. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976; 115: 149-156
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Mulholland RC, Sengupta DK. Rationale, principles and experimental evaluation of the concept of soft stabilization. Eur Spine J 2002; 11 (Suppl. 02) 198-205
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC et al. Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine 2004; 29: 1938-1944
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Pathria M, Sartoris DJ, Resnick D. Osteoarthritis of the facet joints: accuracy of oblique radiographic assessment. Radiology 1987; 164: 227-230
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M et al. Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 2001; 26: 1873-1878
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Szpalski M, Gunzburg R, Mayer M. Spine arthroplasty: a historical review. Eur Spine J 2002; 11 (Suppl. 02) 65-84
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Verbiest H. A radicular syndrome from developmental narrowing of the lumbar vertebral canal. Bone Joint Surg Br 1954; 36-B (2) 230-237
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Vialle R, Levassor N, Rillardon L et al. Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87: 260-267
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 2257-2270
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Wilke HJ, Rohlmann F, Neidlinger-Wilke C et al. Validity and interobserver agreement of a new radiographic grading system for intervertebral disc degeneration: Part I. Lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 2006; 15: 720-730
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Wiltse L, Rothman S. Spondylolisthesis: Classification, diagnosis, and natural history. Semin Spine Surg 1989; 1: 78-94
    PubMedGoogle Scholar