Suitability of the Anterolateral Thigh Perforator Flap and the Soleus Perforator Flap for Intraoral Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study

ABSTRACT

Perforator flaps are suitable for numerous reconstructive purposes. However, there are few data about their usefulness for intraoral reconstruction. We reviewed data of 101 patients who were reconstructed by two types of perforator flaps after oral cancer. Forty-six soleus perforator flaps and fifty-five anterolateral thigh (ALT) perforator flaps were performed. Procedural data and outcome measures were analyzed. One ALT and four soleus perforator flaps were lost, resulting in success rates of 97.8% and 91.4%, respectively. Soleus perforator flaps were more challenging due to short and small-caliber vessels, higher susceptibility to vascular spasm, and difficult prediction of the location of the vascular pedicle. All donor sites in both groups except one were closed directly, and their morbidity was negligible. Perforator flaps from both donor sites can be used for intraoral reconstruction with good functional results; however, despite primary thinning, the ALT flap can be voluminous in small and flat defects. Here, soleus perforator flaps adapt better to the oral mucosa. The ALT perforator flap is more reliable and serves as a safe alternative to the radial forearm flap.

KEYWORDS

Perforator flap - anterolateral thigh perforator flap - lateral soleus perforator

REFERENCES

• 1 Timmons M J, Missotten F E, Poole M D, Davies D M. Complications of radial forearm flap donor sites.  Br J Plast Surg. 1986;  39 176-178
• 2 Boorman J G, Brown J A, Sykes P J. Morbidity in the forearm flap donor arm.  Br J Plast Surg. 1987;  40 207-212
• 3 Jones B M, O'Brien C J. Acute ischaemia of the hand resulting from elevation of a radial forearm flap.  Br J Plast Surg. 1985;  38 396-397
• 4 Wei F C, Jain V, Celik N, Chen H C, Chuang D C, Lin C H. Have we found an ideal soft-tissue flap? An experience with 672 anterolateral thigh flaps.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;  109 2219-2226 discussion 2227-2230
• 5 Gedebou T M, Wei F C, Lin C H. Clinical experience of 1284 free anterolateral thigh flaps.  Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2002;  34 239-244
• 6 Ha B, Baek C H. Head and neck reconstruction using lateral thigh free flap: flap design.  Microsurgery. 1999;  19 157-165
• 7 Koshima I, Hosoda M, Inagawa K, Moriguchi T, Orita Y. Free medial thigh perforator-based flaps: new definition of the pedicle vessels and versatile application.  Ann Plast Surg. 1996;  37 507-515
• 8 Kimura N. A microdissected thin tensor fasciae latae perforator flap.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;  109 69-77 discussion 78-80
• 9 Koshima I, Inagawa K, Urushibara K, Moriguchi T. Paraumbilical perforator flap without deep inferior epigastric vessels.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;  102 1052-1057
• 10 Sekido M, Yamamoto Y, Makino S. Maxillary reconstruction using a free deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap combined with vascularised costal cartilages.  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;  59 1350-1354
• 11 Tan O. Versatility of the vertical designed deep inferior epigastric perforator flap.  Microsurgery. 2009;  29 282-286
• 12 Yano T, Sakuraba M, Asano T, Sarukawa S. Head and neck reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap: a report of two cases.  Microsurgery. 2009;  29 287-292
• 13 Kawamura K, Yajima H, Kobata Y, Shigematsu K, Takakura Y. Clinical applications of free soleus and peroneal perforator flaps.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;  115 114-119
• 14 Koshima I, Soeda S. Free posterior tibial perforator-based flaps.  Ann Plast Surg. 1991;  26 284-288
• 15 Kao H K, Chang K P, Wei F C, Cheng M H. Comparison of the medial sural artery perforator flap with the radial forearm flap for head and neck reconstructions.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;  124 1125-1132
• 16 Wolff K D, Hölzle F, Nolte D. Perforator flaps from the lateral lower leg for intraoral reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;  113 107-113
• 17 Kimura N, Satoh K, Hasumi T, Ostuka T. Clinical application of the free thin anterolateral thigh flap in 31 consecutive patients.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;  108 1197-1208 discussion 1209-1210
• 18 Kimura N, Satoh K. Consideration of a thin flap as an entity and clinical applications of the thin anterolateral thigh flap.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;  97 985-992
• 19 Celik N, Wei F C, Lin C H et al.. Technique and strategy in anterolateral thigh perforator flap surgery, based on an analysis of 15 complete and partial failures in 439 cases.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;  109 2211-2216 discussion 2217-2218
• 20 Luo S, Raffoul W, Luo J et al.. Anterolateral thigh flap: a review of 168 cases.  Microsurgery. 1999;  19 232-238
• 21 Kimata Y, Uchiyama K, Ebihara S, Nakatsuka T, Harii K. Anatomic variations and technical problems of the anterolateral thigh flap: a report of 74 cases.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;  102 1517-1523
• 22 Shieh S J, Chiu H Y, Yu J C, Pan S C, Tsai S T, Shen C L. Free anterolateral thigh flap for reconstruction of head and neck defects following cancer ablation.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;  105 2349-2357 discussion 2358-2360
• 23 Alkureishi L W, Shaw-Dunn J, Ross G L. Effects of thinning the anterolateral thigh flap on the blood supply to the skin.  Br J Plast Surg. 2003;  56 401-408
• 24 Yang W G, Chiang Y C, Wei F C, Feng G M, Chen K T. Thin anterolateral thigh perforator flap using a modified perforator microdissection technique and its clinical application for foot resurfacing.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;  117 1004-1008
• 25 Nojima K, Brown S A, Acikel C et al.. Defining vascular supply and territory of thinned perforator flaps: part I. Anterolateral thigh perforator flap.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;  116 182-193