Download PDF
Rofo 2011; 183(4): 334-346
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1245905
Übersicht

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

CT-Angiografie zur prä- und postoperativen Evaluation in der thorakalen Aortenchirurgie

CT Angiography for the Pre- and Postoperative Evaluation of the Thoracic AortaG. Pache1 , W. Euringer1 , M. Siepe2 , M. Langer1 , P. Blanke1
  • 1Radiology, University Hospital Freiburg
  • 2Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Freiburg
Further Information

Publication History

eingereicht: 9.6.2010

angenommen: 7.11.2010

Publication Date:
20 December 2010 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Die CT-Angiografie hat einen bedeutenden Stellenwert in der prä- und postoperativen Evaluation von Patienten mit Pathologien der thorakalen Aorta. Die vorliegende Übersichtsarbeit erläutert die Grundlagen unter Berücksichtigung der technischen Fortschritte und Anforderungen an spezifische Untersuchungsprotokolle und geht in der Bildinterpretation und Auswertung auf typische prä- und postoperative Fragestellungen ein.

Abstract

CT angiography is the imaging modality of choice for the pre- and postsurgical evaluation of patients with pathologies of the thoracic aorta. The purpose of this review is to familiarize the reader with the technical principle, recent technical developments and requirements for specific examination protocols and image interpretation, and to highlight common pathologies and findings.

Key words

aorta - treatment planning - technical aspects - dissection - aneurysm

Literatur

  • 1 Akin I, Kische S, Schneider H et al. Thoracic aorta aneurysms.  Internist. 2009;  50 964-971
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Clouse W D, Hallett Jr J W, Schaff H V et al. Improved prognosis of thoracic aortic aneurysms: a population-based study.  Jama. 1998;  280 1926-1929
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Hiratzka L F, Bakris G L, Beckman J A et al. 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with Thoracic Aortic Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine.  Circulation. 2010;  121 e266-e369
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Wolak A, Gransar H, Thomson L E et al. Aortic size assessment by noncontrast cardiac computed tomography: normal limits by age, gender, and body surface area.  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;  1 200-209
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Elefteriades J A, Farkas E A. Thoracic aortic aneurysm clinically pertinent controversies and uncertainties.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;  55 841-857
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Braverman A C, Guven H, Beardslee M A et al. The bicuspid aortic valve.  Curr Probl Cardiol. 2005;  30 470-522
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Leber A W, Johnson T, Becker A et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source multi-slice CT-coronary angiography in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood for coronary artery disease.  Eur Heart J. 2007;  28 2354-2360
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Schlosser F J, Mojibian H R, Dardik A et al. Simultaneous sizing and preoperative risk stratification for thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair: role of gated computed tomography.  J Vasc Surg. 2008;  48 561-570
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Theisen D, Tengg-Kobligk von H, Michaely H et al. CT angiography of the aorta.  Radiologe. 2007;  47 982-992
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Brinster D R. Endovascular repair of the descending thoracic aorta for penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer disease.  J Card Surg. 2009;  24 203-208
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Biddinger A, Rocklin M, Coselli J et al. Familial thoracic aortic dilatations and dissections: a case control study.  J Vasc Surg. 1997;  25 506-511
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Coady M A, Davies R R, Roberts M et al. Familial patterns of thoracic aortic aneurysms.  Arch Surg. 1999;  134 361-367
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Moore A G, Eagle K A, Bruckman D et al. Choice of computed tomography, transesophageal echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging, and aortography in acute aortic dissection: International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD).  Am J Cardiol. 2002;  89 1235-1238
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Shiga T, Wajima Z, Apfel C C et al. Diagnostic accuracy of transesophageal echocardiography, helical computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging for suspected thoracic aortic dissection: systematic review and meta-analysis.  Arch Intern Med. 2006;  166 1350-1356
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Rousseau H, Chabbert V, Maracher M A et al. The importance of imaging assessment before endovascular repair of thoracic aorta.  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;  38 408-421
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Yoo S M, Lee H Y, White C S. MDCT evaluation of acute aortic syndrome.  Radiol Clin North Am. 2010;  48 67-83
    Google Scholar
  • 17 LePage M A, Quint L E, Sonnad S S et al. Aortic dissection: CT features that distinguish true lumen from false lumen.  Am J Roentgenol. 2001;  177 207-211
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Alexander S A, Rubin G D. Imaging the thoracic aorta: anatomy, technical considerations, and trauma.  Semin Roentgenol. 2009;  44 8-15
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Neri E, Toscano T, Papalia U et al. Proximal aortic dissection with coronary malperfusion: presentation, management, and outcome.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;  121 552-560
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Klompas M. Does this patient have an acute thoracic aortic dissection?.  Jama. 2002;  287 2262-2272
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Gaul C, Dietrich W, Friedrich I et al. Neurological symptoms in type A aortic dissections.  Stroke. 2007;  38 292-297
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Godoy M C, Cayne N S, Ko J P. Endovascular Repair of the Thoracic Aorta: Preoperative and Postoperative Evaluation With Multidetector Computed Tomography.  J Thorac Imaging. 2010;  PMID 20395874
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Altenbernd J, Schurmann K, Walterbusch G. Stent-graft therapy in a mobile thrombus in the thoracic aorta.  Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2008;  180 158-159
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Muller M, Lachat M, Pfammatter T. Symptomatic endovascular aortic metastases of a mammary carcinoma – therapy using stent grafting.  Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2008;  180 667-669
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Patel H J, Williams D M, Upchurch Jr G R et al. Long-term results from a 12-year experience with endovascular therapy for thoracic aortic disease.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;  82 2147-2153
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Hoang J K, Martinez S, Hurwitz L M. MDCT angiography of thoracic aorta endovascular stent-grafts: pearls and pitfalls.  Am J Roentgenol. 2009;  192 515-524
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Stone D H, Brewster D C, Kwolek C J et al. Stent-graft versus open-surgical repair of the thoracic aorta: mid-term results.  J Vasc Surg. 2006;  44 1188-1197
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Bavaria J E, Appoo J J, Makaroun M S et al. Endovascular stent grafting versus open surgical repair of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms in low-risk patients: a multicenter comparative trial.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;  133 369-377
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Eggebrecht H, Plicht B, Kahlert P et al. Intramural hematoma and penetrating ulcers: indications to endovascular treatment.  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;  38 659-665
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Evangelista A, Mukherjee D, Mehta R H et al. Acute intramural hematoma of the aorta: a mystery in evolution.  Circulation. 2005;  111 1063-1070
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Moizumi Y, Komatsu T, Motoyoshi N et al. Clinical features and long-term outcome of type A and type B intramural hematoma of the aorta.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;  127 421-427
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Garzon G, Fernandez-Velilla M, Marti M et al. Endovascular stent-graft treatment of thoracic aortic disease.  Radiographics. 2005;  25 S229-S244
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Piffaretti G, Tozzi M, Lomazzi C et al. Penetrating ulcers of the thoracic aorta: results from a single-centre experience.  Am J Surg. 2007;  193 443-447
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Akhtar N J, Markowitz A H, Gilkeson R C. Multidetector computed tomography in the preoperative assessment of cardiac surgery patients.  Radiol Clin North Am. 2010;  48 117-139
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Umana J P, Miller D C, Mitchell R S. What is the best treatment for patients with acute type B aortic dissections – medical, surgical, or endovascular stent-grafting?.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;  74 S1840-1843 ; discussion S 1857–S1863
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Svensson L G, Crawford E S, Hess K R et al. Experience with 1509 patients undergoing thoracoabdominal aortic operations.  J Vasc Surg. 1993;  17 357-368 ; discussion 368 – 370
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Matsuda H, Fukuda T, Iritani O et al. Spinal cord injury is not negligible after TEVAR for lower descending aorta.  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;  39 179-186
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Kovacs A, Schiller W, Gerhards H M et al. Visualization of the Adamkiewicz artery in patients with acute stanford a dissections: a prospective 64-row multi-detector CT study.  Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2009;  181 870-874
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Boll D T, Bulow H, Blackham K A et al. MDCT angiography of the spinal vasculature and the artery of Adamkiewicz.  Am J Roentgenol. 2006;  187 1054-1060
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Siegenthaler M P, Weigang E, Brehm K et al. Endovascular treatment for thoracoabdominal aneurysms: outcomes and results.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;  34 810-819
    Google Scholar
  • 41 Steenburg S D, Ravenel J G, Ikonomidis J S et al. Acute traumatic aortic injury: imaging evaluation and management.  Radiology. 2008;  248 748-762
    Google Scholar
  • 42 Burkhart H M, Gomez G A, Jacobson L E et al. Fatal blunt aortic injuries: a review of 242 autopsy cases.  J Trauma. 2001;  50 113-115
    Google Scholar
  • 43 Parmley L F, Mattingly T W, Manion W C et al. Nonpenetrating traumatic injury of the aorta.  Circulation. 1958;  17 1086-1101
    Google Scholar
  • 44 Quint L E, Francis I R, Williams D M et al. Synthetic interposition grafts of the thoracic aorta: postoperative appearance on serial CT studies.  Radiology. 1999;  211 317-324
    Google Scholar
  • 45 Hoang J K, Martinez S, Hurwitz L M. MDCT angiography after open thoracic aortic surgery: pearls and pitfalls.  Am J Roentgenol. 2009;  192 W20-W27
    Google Scholar
  • 46 Sundaram B, Quint L E, Patel S et al. CT appearance of thoracic aortic graft complications.  Am J Roentgenol. 2007;  188 1273-1277
    Google Scholar
  • 47 Katsumata T, Moorjani N, Vaccari G et al. Mediastinal false aneurysm after thoracic aortic surgery.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;  70 547-552
    Google Scholar
  • 48 Macari M, Chandarana H, Schmidt B et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysm: can the arterial phase at CT evaluation after endovascular repair be eliminated to reduce radiation dose?.  Radiology. 2006;  241 908-914
    Google Scholar
  • 49 Fattori R, Nienaber C A, Rousseau H et al. Results of endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta with the Talent Thoracic stent graft: the Talent Thoracic Retrospective Registry.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;  132 332-339
    Google Scholar
  • 50 Bangard C, Gawenda M, Lackner K. Transarterial occlusion of type 1 endoleak of the aortic arch by coil embolization and thrombin injection after endovascular therapy of retrograde Stanford A dissection.  Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2008;  180 926-928
    Google Scholar
  • 51 Heikkinen M A, Arko F R, Zarins C K. What is the significance of endoleaks and endotension.  Surg Clin North Am. 2004;  84 1337-1352, vii
    Google Scholar
  • 52 Leon Jr L R, Rodriguez H E. Aortic endograft migration.  Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2005;  17 363-373
    Google Scholar
  • 53 Resch T, Koul B, Dias N V et al. Changes in aneurysm morphology and stent-graft configuration after endovascular repair of aneurysms of the descending thoracic aorta.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;  122 47-52
    Google Scholar
  • 54 Fairman R M, Criado F, Farber M et al. Pivotal results of the Medtronic Vascular Talent Thoracic Stent Graft System: the VALOR trial.  J Vasc Surg. 2008;  48 546-554
    Google Scholar
  • 55 Matsumura J S, Cambria R P, Dake M D et al. International controlled clinical trial of thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair with the Zenith TX 2 endovascular graft: 1-year results.  J Vasc Surg. 2008;  47 247-257 ; discussion 257
    Google Scholar
  • 56 Roos J E, Willmann J K, Weishaupt D et al. Thoracic aorta: motion artifact reduction with retrospective and prospective electrocardiography-assisted multi-detector row CT.  Radiology. 2002;  222 271-277
    Google Scholar
  • 57 Blanke P, Bulla S, Baumann T et al. Thoracic aorta: prospective electrocardiographically triggered CT angiography with dual-source CT – feasibility, image quality, and dose reduction.  Radiology. 2010;  255 207-217
    Google Scholar
  • 58 McMahon M A, Squirrell C A. Multidetector CT of Aortic Dissection: A Pictorial Review.  Radiographics. 2010;  30 445-460
    Google Scholar
  • 59 Blanke P, Baumann T, Bulla S et al. Prospective ECG-triggered CT angiography of the thoracic aorta in patients with atrial fibrillation or accelerated heart rates: feasibility and image quality.  Am J Roentgenol. 2010;  194 W111-W114
    Google Scholar
  • 60 Weissler A M, Peeler R G, Roehll Jr W H. Relationships between left ventricular ejection time, stroke volume, and heart rate in normal individuals and patients with cardiovascular disease.  Am Heart J. 1961;  62 367-378
    Google Scholar
  • 61 Cieslinski A, Hui W K, Oldershaw P J et al. Interaction between systolic and diastolic time intervals in atrial fibrillation.  Br Heart J. 1984;  51 431-437
    Google Scholar
  • 62 Lell M, Hinkmann F, Anders K et al. High-pitch electrocardiogram-triggered computed tomography of the chest: initial results.  Invest Radiol. 2009;  44 728-733
    Google Scholar
  • 63 Johnson T R, Krauss B, Sedlmair M et al. Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience.  Eur Radiol. 2007;  17 1510-1517
    Google Scholar
  • 64 Nakayama Y, Awai K, Funama Y et al. Abdominal CT with low tube voltage: preliminary observations about radiation dose, contrast enhancement, image quality, and noise.  Radiology. 2005;  237 945-951
    Google Scholar
  • 65 Bae K T, Seeck B A, Hildebolt C F et al. Contrast enhancement in cardiovascular MDCT: effect of body weight, height, body surface area, body mass index, and obesity.  Am J Roentgenol. 2008;  190 777-784
    Google Scholar
  • 66 Bischoff B, Hein F, Meyer T et al. Comparison of sequential and helical scanning for radiation dose and image quality: results of the Prospective Multicenter Study on Radiation Dose Estimates of Cardiac CT Angiography (PROTECTION) I Study.  Am J Roentgenol. 2010;  194 1495-1499
    Google Scholar
  • 67 Takakuwa K M, Halpern E J, Gingold E L et al. Radiation dose in a „triple rule-out” coronary CT angiography protocol of emergency department patients using 64-MDCT: the impact of ECG-based tube current modulation on age, sex, and body mass index.  Am J Roentgenol. 2009;  192 866-872
    Google Scholar
  • 68 Halpern E J. Triple-rule-out CT angiography for evaluation of acute chest pain and possible acute coronary syndrome.  Radiology. 2009;  252 332-345
    Google Scholar
  • 69 Sommer W H, Schenzle J C, Becker C R et al. Saving dose in triple-rule-out computed tomography examination using a high-pitch dual spiral technique.  Invest Radiol. 2010;  45 64-71
    Google Scholar
  • 70 Lu T L, Rizzo E, Marques-Vidal P M et al. Variability of ascending aorta diameter measurements as assessed with electrocardiography-gated multidetector computerized tomography and computer assisted diagnosis software.  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010;  10 217-221
    Google Scholar
  • 71 Burman E D, Keegan J, Kilner P J. Aortic root measurement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: specification of planes and lines of measurement and corresponding normal values.  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;  1 104-113
    Google Scholar

Dr. Gregor Pache

Radiology, University Hospital Freiburg

Hugstetter Str. 55

79106 Freiburg

Phone: ++ 49/7 61/2 70 38 02

Fax: ++ 49/7 61/2 70 38 30

Email: gregor.pache@uniklinik-freiburg.de

      >