Endoscopy 2009; 41: E25-E26
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1103471
Unusual cases and technical notes

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Appendiceal intussusception due to a fecalith mimicking a submucosal tumor

C.  K.  Lee1 , S.-H.  Lee1 , J.-Y.  Park1 , T.  H.  Lee1 , I.-K . Chung1 , S.-H.  Park1 , H.-S.  Kim1 , S.-J.  Kim1
  • 1Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan, Republic of Korea
Further Information

S.-H. Lee, MD

Division of Gastroenterology
Department of Internal Medicine
Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine
Cheonan Hospital

23-20 Bongmyung-dong
Cheonan City
Choongnam
Korea

Fax: +82-41-5745762

Email: ygun99@hanmail.net

Publication History

Publication Date:
13 February 2009 (online)

Table of Contents

A 44-year-old man underwent a colonoscopic examination for a health evaluation. He had no subjective symptoms. A colonoscopy revealed a polypoid lesion 2.0 cm in diameter at the site of the appendiceal orifice. This lesion had pink-colored, normal-appearing mucosa with a smooth surface and a 2-mm central dimple ([Fig. 1]). When pushed by a biopsy forceps, the lesion was found to have a hard consistency and could be partially reduced into the appendiceal base. On the basis of the colonoscopic finding, a presumptive diagnosis of a submucosal tumor arising from the appendix was made. An abdominal CT scan showed the presence of mixed-attenuation material with a high-attenuation component in the lumen of the appendiceal base ([Fig. 2]). Endoscopic ultrasonography demonstrated a heterogeneous hyperechoic mass with focal calcification and acoustic shadowing within the partially invaginated appendiceal wall ([Fig. 3]). We planned an endoscopic resection of the lesion for a histopathological diagnosis. Initially, the tumor base was ligated with an Endoloop (Olympus Optical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). After incision of the overlying mucosa with a fixed flexible knife, a 1.5-cm-sized, relatively hard, earthy-yellow-colored body of impacted material was expelled from the lesion ([Fig. 4 a, b]). A histopathological examination confirmed the material as a fecalith. After endoscopic removal of a fecalith, the invaginated appendiceal base (intussusceptum) was clearly identified in the cecum (intussuscipiens) ([Fig. 4 c]).

Zoom Image

Fig. 1 Colonoscopic view showing a polypoid lesion protruding from the appendiceal orifice with a normal-appearing mucosa and a central dimple.

Zoom Image

Fig. 2 Abdominal CT image showing a mixed-attenuation material with a high-attenuation component in the lumen of the appendiceal base (arrows).

Zoom Image

Fig. 3 Endoscopic ultrasound image showing a heterogeneous hyperechoic mass (arrowhead) within the partially invaginated appendiceal wall (arrow).

Zoom Image
Zoom Image
Zoom Image

Fig. 4 Colonoscopic findings during the procedure. a The tumor base is ligated with an Endoloop. Note the fixed flexible knife. b After incision of the overlying mucosa, a fecalith is expelled from the lesion. c The invaginated appendiceal base is noted in the cecum.

We presented a case of appendiceal intussusception due to a fecalith mimicking a submucosal tumor. Intussusception of the appendix is very rare and is difficult to diagnose preoperatively [1]. A reported incidence is 0.01 % of surgically removed appendices [1]. The essential mechanism of intussusception of the appendix is thought to be an abnormal peristalsis caused by local irritation, including irritation by a fecalith, foreign body, mucocele, endometriosis, or neoplasm [2] [3]. Appendiceal intussusception should be suspected when a dimpling submucosal tumor is noted at the appendiceal orifice.

Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AQ_2AJ

#

References

  • 1 Collins D C. 71,000 human appendix specimens. A final report, summarizing forty years’ study.  Am J Proctol. 1963;  14 265-281
  • 2 Fink V H, Santos A L, Goldberg S L. Intussusception of the appendix. Case reports and reviews of the literature.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1964;  42 431-441
  • 3 Duncan J E, DeNobile J W, Sweeney W B. Colonoscopic diagnosis of appendiceal intussusception: case report and review of the literature.  JSLS. 2005;  9 488-490

S.-H. Lee, MD

Division of Gastroenterology
Department of Internal Medicine
Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine
Cheonan Hospital

23-20 Bongmyung-dong
Cheonan City
Choongnam
Korea

Fax: +82-41-5745762

Email: ygun99@hanmail.net

#

References

  • 1 Collins D C. 71,000 human appendix specimens. A final report, summarizing forty years’ study.  Am J Proctol. 1963;  14 265-281
  • 2 Fink V H, Santos A L, Goldberg S L. Intussusception of the appendix. Case reports and reviews of the literature.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1964;  42 431-441
  • 3 Duncan J E, DeNobile J W, Sweeney W B. Colonoscopic diagnosis of appendiceal intussusception: case report and review of the literature.  JSLS. 2005;  9 488-490

S.-H. Lee, MD

Division of Gastroenterology
Department of Internal Medicine
Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine
Cheonan Hospital

23-20 Bongmyung-dong
Cheonan City
Choongnam
Korea

Fax: +82-41-5745762

Email: ygun99@hanmail.net

Zoom Image

Fig. 1 Colonoscopic view showing a polypoid lesion protruding from the appendiceal orifice with a normal-appearing mucosa and a central dimple.

Zoom Image

Fig. 2 Abdominal CT image showing a mixed-attenuation material with a high-attenuation component in the lumen of the appendiceal base (arrows).

Zoom Image

Fig. 3 Endoscopic ultrasound image showing a heterogeneous hyperechoic mass (arrowhead) within the partially invaginated appendiceal wall (arrow).

Zoom Image
Zoom Image
Zoom Image

Fig. 4 Colonoscopic findings during the procedure. a The tumor base is ligated with an Endoloop. Note the fixed flexible knife. b After incision of the overlying mucosa, a fecalith is expelled from the lesion. c The invaginated appendiceal base is noted in the cecum.