Subscribe to RSS
Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/en/10.1055-s-00000083.xml
Synlett
DOI: 10.1055/a-2800-1313
DOI: 10.1055/a-2800-1313
Letter
A Ligand-free CuCl Catalytic System for the N-Arylation of Benzotriazoles
Authors
We thank the Nanyang Technological University (RI 2/21 TYC and RS 7/23 TYC) for funding this work.

Abstract
A general copper(I) chloride (CuCl) catalyst system was developed for the N-arylation of benzotriazoles using substituted aryl iodides under ligand-free conditions. Herein, 20 mol% CuCl was used to synthesise N-aryl benzotriazole derivatives in moderate to good yields. The practicality and low cost of this method make it well suited for both academic research and large-scale industrial applications.
Publication History
Received: 12 November 2025
Accepted after revision: 28 January 2026
Article published online:
19 February 2026
© 2026. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1a Suma BV, Natesh NN, Madhavan V. J Chem Pharm Res 2011; 3: 375
- 1b Briguglio I, Piras S, Corona P. et al. Eur J Med Chem 2015; 97: 612
- 2a Dixit PP, Nair PS, Patil VJ, Jain S, Arora SK, Sinha N. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2005; 15: 3002
- 2b Mishra N, Arora P, Kumar B. et al. Eur J Med Chem 2008; 43: 1530
- 2c Rezaei Z, Khabnadideh S, Pakshir K, Hossaini Z, Amiri F, Assadpour E. Eur J Med Chem 2009; 44: 3064
- 3a Katritzky AR, Lan X, Yang JZ, Denisko OV. Chem Rev 1998; 98: 409-548
- 3b Ozturk T, Ertas E, Mert O. Chem Rev 2010; 110: 3419-3478
- 4a Okolotowicz KJ, Bushway P, Lanier M, Gilley C, Mercola M, Cashman. Bioorg Med Chem 2015; 23: 5282
- 4b Chen M, Buchwald SL. Angew Chem Int Ed 2013; 52: 4247
- 4c Ukasik E, Wróbel Z. Synlett 2014; 25: 1987
- 5a Alexey VS, Abramov IG, Plakhtinskii VV, Krasovskaya GG. Mendeleev Commun 2002; 12: 72
- 5b Katritzky AR, Wu J. J Synth 1994; 597
- 6a For representative examples, see: Gann AW, Amoroso JW, Einck VJ, Rice WP, Chambers JJ, Schnarr NA. Org Lett 2014; 16: 2003
- 6b Chang D, Zhu D, Shi L. J Org Chem 2015; 80: 5928
- 6c Chen Q, Yu H, Xu Z, Lin L, Jiang X, Wang R. J Org Chem 2015; 80: 6890
- 6d Isak A, Richard R, Christian GB. Eur J Org Chem 2017; 3197
- 6e Guin A, Gaykar RN, Bhattacharjee S, Biju AT. J Org Chem 2019; 84: 12692
- 6f Carolina AMA, Cristiano R. ACS Omega 2020; 5: 2440
- 7 Antilla JC, Baskin M, Barder TE, Buchwald SL. J Org Chem 2004; 69: 5578
- 8 Mukhopadhyay C, Tapaswi PK. Synth Commun 2012; 42: 2217
- 9 Chen W, Zhang Y, Zhu L, Lan J, Xie R, You J. J Am Chem Soc 2007; 129: 13879
- 10 Panda N, Jena AK, Mohapatra S, Rout SR. Tetrahedron Lett 1924; 2011: 52
- 11a Tan BY-H, Teo YC. Tetrahedron Lett 2016; 72: 6646
- 11b Tan BY-H, Teo YC. Synlett 2018; 29: 2056
- 11c Tan BY-H, Teo YC, Seow A-H. Eur J Org Chem 2014; 1541
- 11d Bai D-X, Lim RS-E, Ng H-F, Teo Y-C. Synth Commun 2021; 51: 1398
- 11e Teo Y-C, Tan Y-R, Saanvi K, Loh C-K, Tan S-N. Synth Commun 2023; 53: 1143
- 12 Ang W, Low CK-Y, Teo Y-C. Synlett 2024; 35: 821
- 13 Kale RR, Prasad V, Hussain HA, Tiwari VK. Tetrahedron Lett 2010; 51: 5740
- 14 1-Phenyl-1H-benzo[d][1,2,3]triazole (Table 2, Entry 1); Typical Procedure: To a reaction vial were added CuCl (0.3 mmol, 0.2 equiv), Cs₂CO₃ (3.0 mmol, 2.0 equiv) and benzotriazole (1.5 mmol, 1.0 equiv), followed by 750 μL of dimethylformamide (DMF) and bromobenzene (3.0 mmol, 2.0 equiv). The vial was sealed with a screw cap and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 5 min. The reaction mixture was then heated at 125 °C under air in a silicon oil bath for 18 h. After completion, the reaction was cooled to room temperature and diluted with dichloromethane (3 × 10 mL). The organic layer was dried over anhydrous Na₂SO₄, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography on silica gel to afford the desired compound. The structure and purity of the product were confirmed by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy, as well as elemental analysis. Following the general procedure, the reaction provided 82% yield of the coupling product, after purification by silica gel-chromatography. 1H NMR (400MHz CDCl3): d = 8.15 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), d = 7.75–7.81 (m, 3H), d = 7.60–7.64 (m, 2H), d = 7.49–7.57 (m, 2H), d = 7.42–7.46 (m, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): 110.4, 120.4, 122.9, 124.4, 128.3, 128.7, 129.9, 137.0, 139.9, 146.5; Anal. calcd: C, 73.83; H, 4.65; N, 21.52; found: C, 74.02; H, 4.96; N, 21.43. 1-(3-fluorophenyl)-1H-benzo[d][1,2,3]triazole (Table 2, Entry 6): Following the general procedure, the reaction provided 74% yield of the coupling product, after purification by silica gel-chromatography. FTIR (neat): 1501.9, 1461.3, 1225.3, 1086.4, 741.9, 682.2 cm−1 1H NMR (400 MHz CDCl3): d = 8.16 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), d = 7.78 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), d = 7.57–7.64 (m, 4H), d = 7.44–7.48 (m, 1H), d = 7.19–7.24 (m, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): 110.2, 115.5, 115.7, 120.6, 124.7, 128.7, 131.2, 131.3, 132.1, 146.6, 161.9, 164.4.; Anal. calcd: C, 67.60; H, 3.78; N, 19.71; found: C, 67.82; H, 3.81; N, 19.63. 1-(3-methoxyphenyl)-1H-benzo[d][1,2,3]triazole (Table 2, Entry 9): Following the general procedure, the reaction provided 70% yield of the coupling product, after purification by silica gel-chromatography. FTIR (neat): 1497.1, 1471.1, 1322.1, 1235.7, 1092.0, 735.9, 687.8 cm−1 1H NMR (400MHz CDCl3): d = 8.15 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), d = 7.77 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), d = 7.49–7.57 (m, 2H), d = 7.42–7.46 (m, 1H), d = 7.35–7.38 (m, 2H), – = 7.03–7.06 (m, 1H), d = 3.91 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): 55.7, 108.7, 110.5, 114.5, 114.8, 120.4, 124.4, 128.3, 130.6, 132.3, 138.1, 146.6, 160.7; Anal. calcd: C, 69.32; H, 4.92; N, 18.66; found: C, 69.16; H, 5.11; N, 18.63. 1-(4-chlorophenyl)-1H-benzo[d][1,2,3]triazole (Table 2, Entry 13): Following the general procedure, the reaction provided 70% yield of the coupling product, after purification by silica gel-chromatography. FTIR (neat): 1501.2, 1453.4, 1248.2, 1072.8, 740.1, 662.7 cm−1 1H NMR (400MHz CDCl3): d = 8.16 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), d = 7.71–7.77 (m, 3H), d = 7.56–7.62 (m, 3H), d = 7.44–7.48 (m, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): 110.1, 120.5, 124.0, 124.6, 128.6, 130.1, 132.2, 134.5, 135.6, 146.6; Anal. calcd: C, 62.76; H, 3.51; N, 18.39; found: C, 63.05; H, 3.65; N, 18.13. 1-(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-1H-benzo[d][1,2,3]triazole (Table 2, Entry 17): Following the general procedure, the reaction provided 71% yield of the coupling product, after purification by silica gel-chromatography. FTIR (neat): 1524.4, 1456.8, 1247.5, 1109.1, 748.7, 660.1 cm−1 1H NMR (400MHz CDCl3): d = 8.18 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), d = 7.89–8.00 (m, 4H), d = 7.79 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), d = 7.60–7.63 (m, 1H), d = 7.46–7.51 (m, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): 110.1, 120.7, 122.6, 124.8, 127.1, 127.2, 128.9, 130.7, 132.0, 139.9, 146.8; Anal. calcd: C, 59.32; H, 3.06; N, 15.96; found: C, 59.45; H, 2.98; N, 16.07.