Semin Thromb Hemost 2026; 52(02): 186-198
DOI: 10.1055/a-2635-2266
Review Article

Comparative Study of Venous Thromboembolic Prophylaxis Strategies for Patients with Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Authors

  • Changyi Wang*

    1   Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sichuan University, West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
  • Maonan Han*

    2   Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Sichuan University, West China Hospital, Chengdu, China
  • Ling Ren

    1   Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sichuan University, West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
  • Yihan Wang

    3   West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
  • Qingchuan Wei

    1   Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sichuan University, West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
  • Ping Mou

    1   Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sichuan University, West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
  • Jing He

    1   Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sichuan University, West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China

Funding This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation (82402974) and the Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province (2023NSFSC1580).

Abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a common complication in patients with ischemic stroke. Several prophylactic strategies are used to reduce the risk of VTE. However, there is still a lack of consensus on the optimal strategy due to the lack of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) directly comparing different interventions. The objective of this study was to explore the efficacy and safety of different thromboembolic prophylaxis strategies in patients with ischemic stroke. We conducted a systematic literature review to identify all eligible RCTs, searching MEDLINE and Embase up to December 31, 2024. We considered DVT and PE as efficacy outcomes and intracranial and extracranial hemorrhage as safety outcome measures. Relevant data were extracted for network meta-analyses. A random-effects model was used for the analysis. A total of 33 RCTs were included in the analysis. Network meta-analysis revealed that low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and heparinoid were associated with significantly decreased risk of DVT and PE compared with no prophylaxis, with risk ratios of 0.18 (95% confidence interval: 0.10–0.32) and 0.36 (0.20–0.63), respectively. However, LMWH and heparinoid were associated with an increased risk of extracranial hemorrhage compared with no prophylaxis, with a risk ratio of 2.03 (1.24–3.34). Our study supports the use of LMWH and heparinoid as the primary thromboembolic prophylaxis measure in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Further, high-quality RCTs are needed to strengthen the evidence base and determine the optimal prophylactic strategy in these patients.

Authors' Contributions

The original idea of this research was conceived by C.W., M.H., J.H., P.M., and Q.W. C.W. drafted this manuscript. M.H., L.R., and Y.W. participated in the development of the eligibility criteria, search strategy, data extraction methods, and data summary plan. C.W., M.H., L.R., and Y.W. searched and screened the studies and extracted and analyzed the data. C.W. and M.H. assessed the methodological quality of the included studies. Q.W., P.M., and J.H. supervised this work. All authors approved the final version of this manuscript.


* These authors contribute equally to this article.




Publication History

Received: 21 April 2025

Accepted: 13 June 2025

Article published online:
10 July 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA