Download PDF
Zentralbl Chir 2021; 146(03): 249-259
DOI: 10.1055/a-1385-0357
Übersicht

Strukturelle Implementierung eines Fast-Track-Programms – wie geht das?

Structured Implementation of a Fast-Track Program – How Does it Work?
Wolfgang Schwenk
Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Städtisches Klinikum Solingen gGmbH, Deutschland
,
Ina Lang
Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Städtisches Klinikum Solingen gGmbH, Deutschland
,
Marion Huhn
Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Städtisches Klinikum Solingen gGmbH, Deutschland
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Fast-Track- oder ERAS-Konzepte gehen mit klinisch relevanten Vorteilen für operierte Patienten und ökonomischen Vorteilen für das Krankenhaus einher. Dennoch sind Fast-Track-Konzepte in Deutschland bislang nur in einzelnen chirurgischen Kliniken realisiert worden. Weder das Fehlen wissenschaftlicher Evidenz noch Einschränkungen durch das G-DRG-System sind Grund dieser ausbleibenden Fast-Track-Verbreitung in Deutschland. Vielmehr ist der Wandlungsprozess von der traditionellen perioperativen Behandlung zur evidenzbasierten Fast-Track-Therapie komplex und erfordert einen strukturierten und aufwendigen Implementierungsvorgang. International sind Programme zur Etablierung des Fast-Track etabliert und in zahlreichen Kliniken erfolgreich durchgeführt worden. Diese strukturierte Fast-Track-Implementierung wird in die Abschnitte organisatorische Vorbereitung, klinische Implementierung und Ergebnisüberprüfung gegliedert. Aufgrund der großen Komplexität der Wandlung ist eine externe Begleitung und Schulung des multiprofessionellen Teams durch externe Fast-Track-Spezialisten sinnvoll.

Abstract

Fast-track or ERAS programs can give clinically relevant benefits for patients undergoing surgery. They also have financial advantages for the hospital. Despite these facts, fast-track has been implemented in only very few hospitals in Germany. Neither scientific evidence nor reimbursement regulations explain this lack of fast-track acceptance. It seems however that a structured process of change from traditional perioperative medicine to evidence based fast-track therapy is missing in Germany. In other countries, structured programs for fast-track or ERAS implementation have been successful in many hospitals. This article describes structured fast-track implementation divided into three consecutive steps: organisational preparation, clinical implementation and continuous examination of fast-track adherence, functional recovery, morbidity and postoperative length of hospital stay. Due to its complex nature, fast-track implementation should be guided by external fast-track experts.

Schlüsselwörter

perioperative Medizin - Fast-Track-Rehabilitation - ERAS - Veränderungsmanagement

Key words

ERAS - fast-track rehabilitation - change management - perioperative medicine


Publication History

Article published online:
29 March 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Schwenk W. Bessere Genesung nach Operationen – hält ERAS, was es verspricht?. Chirurg 2021; DOI: 10.1007/s00104-020-01328-y.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Ljungqvist O, Francis N, Urman RD. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS). A Complete Guide to optimizing Outcomes. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2020
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Schwenk W, Spies C, Müller J. Fast Track in der operativen Medizin: Perioperative Behandlungspfade für Chirurgie, Gynäkologie, Urologie, Anästhesie und Pflege. Heidelberg: Springer; 2008
    Google Scholar
  • 4 AlBalawi Z, Gramlich L, Nelson G. et al. The Impact of the Implementation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Program in an Entire Health System: A Natural Experiment in Alberta, Canada. World J Surg 2018; 42: 2691-2700
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Thanh N, Nelson A, Wang X. et al. Return on investment of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) multiguideline, multisite implementation in Alberta, Canada. Can J Surg 2020; 63: E542-E550
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Joliat GR, Hübner M, Roulin D. et al. Cost Analysis of Enhanced Recovery Programs in Colorectal, Pancreatic, and Hepatic Surgery: A Systematic Review. World J Surg 2020; 44: 647-655
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Gillissen F, Hoff C, Maessen JM. et al. Structured synchronous implementation of an enhanced recovery program in elective colonic surgery in 33 hospitals in The Netherlands. World J Surg 2013; 37: 1082-1093
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Schwenk W, Günther N, Wendling P. et al. “Fast-track” rehabilitation for elective colonic surgery in Germany–prospective observational data from a multi-centre quality assurance programme. Int J Colorectal Dis 2008; 23: 93-99
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 van Beekum C, Stoffels B, von Websky M. et al. [Implementation of a fast track program: Challenges and solution approaches]. Chirurg 2020; 91: 143-149
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Stone AB, Yuan CT, Rosen MA. et al. Barriers to and Facilitators of Implementing Enhanced Recovery Pathways Using an Implementation Framework: A Systematic Review. JAMA Surg 2018; 153: 270-279
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 De Allegri M, Schwarzbach M, Loerbroks A. et al. Which factors are important for the successful development and implementation of clinical pathways? A qualitative study. BMJ Qual Saf 2011; 20: 203-208
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Melloul E, Lassen K, Roulin D. et al. Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Pancreatoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Recommendations 2019. World J Surg 2020; 44: 2056-2084
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hubner M, Kusamura S, Villeneuve L. et al. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) with or without hyperthermic IntraPEritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations – Part I: Preoperative and intraoperative management. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 46: 2292-2310 doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2020.07.041
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Low DE, Allum W, De Manzoni G. et al. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Esophagectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations. World J Surg 2019; 43: 299-330
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Hubner M. et al. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Colorectal Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations: 2018. World J Surg 2019; 43: 659-695
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Thorell A, MacCormick AD, Awad S. et al. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Bariatric Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations. World J Surg 2016; 40: 2065-2083
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Melloul E, Hübner M, Scott M. et al. Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Liver Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations. World J Surg 2016; 40: 2425-2440
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Mortensen K, Nilsson M, Slim K. et al. Consensus guidelines for enhanced recovery after gastrectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. Br J Surg 2014; 101: 1209-1229
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Nygren J, Thacker J, Carli F. et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society recommendations. World J Surg 2013; 37: 285-305
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W. et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society recommendations. World J Surg 2013; 37: 259-284
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Kunz R. et al. Going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ 2008; 336: 1049-1051
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Vist GE. et al. What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians?. BMJ 2008; 336: 995-998
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Vist GE. et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008; 336: 924-926
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Wei IH, Pappou EP, Smith JJ. et al. Monitoring an Ongoing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program: Adherence Improves Clinical Outcomes in a Comparison of Three Thousand Colorectal Cases. Clin Surg 2020; 5: 2909
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Ripolles-Melchor J, Ramirez-Rodriguez JM, Casans-Frances R. et al. Association Between Use of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol and Postoperative Complications in Colorectal Surgery: The Postoperative Outcomes Within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol (POWER) Study. JAMA Surg 2019; 154: 725-736
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Carrao A, Ribeiro D, Manso M. et al. ERAS® Program in a Portuguese Hospital: Results from Elective Colorectal Surgery after One Year of Implementation. Acta Med Port 2020; 33: 568-575
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Anger F, Wellner U, Klinger C. et al. The Effect of Day of the Week on Morbidity and Mortality From Colorectal and Pancreatic Surgery. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2020; 117: 521-527
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Watson DJ. Nurse coordinators and ERAS programs. Nurs Manage 2018; 49: 42-49
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Francis NK, Walker T, Carter F. et al. Consensus on Training and Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A Delphi Study. World J Surg 2018; 42: 1919-1928
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Balfour A, Burch J, Fecher-Jones I. et al. Exploring the fundamental aspects of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery nurseʼs role. Nurs Stand 2019; DOI: 10.7748/ns.2019.e11437.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Group EC. The Impact of Enhanced Recovery Protocol Compliance on Elective Colorectal Cancer Resection: Results From an International Registry. Ann Surg 2015; 261: 1153-1159
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Berian JR, Ban KA, Liu JB. et al. Adherence to Enhanced Recovery Protocols in NSQIP and Association With Colectomy Outcomes. Ann Surg 2019; 269: 486-493
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Maessen J, Dejong CH, Hausel J. et al. A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 224-231
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Byrne BE, Faiz OD, Bottle A. et al. A Protocol is not Enough: Enhanced Recovery Program-Based Care and Clinician Adherence Associated with Shorter Stay After Colorectal Surgery. World J Surg 2021; 45: 347-355 doi:10.1007/s00268-020-05810-w
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Pędziwiatr M, Kisialeuski M, Wierdak M. et al. Early implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) protocol – Compliance improves outcomes: A prospective cohort study. Int J Surg 2015; 21: 75-81
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Forsmo HM, Pfeffer F, Rasdal A. et al. Compliance with enhanced recovery after surgery criteria and preoperative and postoperative counselling reduces length of hospital stay in colorectal surgery: results of a randomized controlled trial. Colorectal Dis 2016; 18: 603-611
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Hartman A, Leonard D, Trefois C. et al. Good compliance to enhanced recovery program improves outcome after colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 2020; DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07903-y.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Hübner M, Addor V, Slieker J. et al. The impact of an enhanced recovery pathway on nursing workload: A retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 2015; 24: 45-50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Gillissen F, Ament SM, Maessen JM. et al. Sustainability of an enhanced recovery after surgery program (ERAS) in colonic surgery. World J Surg 2015; 39: 526-533
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Beloeil H, Slim K. Francophone Group of enhanced recovery after surgery. Sustainability of anaesthesia components of an enhanced recovery program (ERP) in colorectal and orthopaedics surgery. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2019; 38: 25-28 doi:10.1016/j.accpm.2018.01.005
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Grass F, Hübner M, Mathis KL. et al. Challenges to accomplish stringent fluid management standards 7 years after enhanced recovery after surgery implementation-The surgeonʼs perspective. Surgery 2020; 168: 313-319
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Norman A, Mahoney K, Ballah E. et al. Sustainability of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery initiative for elective colorectal resections in a community hospital. Can J Surg 2020; 63: E292-E298
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Gramlich L, Nelson G, Nelson A. et al. Moving enhanced recovery after surgery from implementation to sustainability across a health system: a qualitative assessment of leadership perspectives. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20: 361
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Pisarska M, Gajewska N, Malczak P. et al. Is It Possible to Maintain High Compliance with the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Protocol?-A Cohort Study of 400 Consecutive Colorectal Cancer Patients. J Clin Med 2018; 7: 412 doi:10.3390/jcm7110412
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 de Groot JJA, Maessen JMC, Dejong CHC. et al. Interdepartmental Spread of Innovations: A Multicentre Study of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Programme. World J Surg 2018; 42: 2348-2355
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Jensen P. et al. Recovery after laparoscopic colonic surgery with epidural analgesia, and early oral nutrition and mobilisation. Lancet 1995; 345: 763-764
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Germer CT, Reibetanz J. In-hospital-Mortalität nach kolorektaler Karzinomchirurgie in Abhängigkeit des Fallaufkommens. Chirurg 2020; 91: 165
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Diers J, Baum P, Matthes H. et al. Mortality and complication management after surgery for colorectal cancer depending on the DKG minimum amounts for hospital volume. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.09.024.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Slim K, Delaunay L, Joris J. et al. How to implement an enhanced recovery program? Proposals from the Francophone Group for enhanced recovery after surgery (GRACE). J Visc Surg 2016; 153: S45-S49
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Nelson G, Kiyang LN, Crumley ET. et al. Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Across a Provincial Healthcare System: The ERAS Alberta Colorectal Surgery Experience. World J Surg 2016; 40: 1092-1103
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Watson DJ. The role of the nurse coordinator in the enhanced recovery after surgery program. Nursing 2017; 47: 13-17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Hubner M, Kusamura S, Villeneuve L. et al. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) with or without hyperthermic IntraPEritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations – Part II: Postoperative management and special considerations. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 46: 2311-2323 doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2020.08.006
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Mortensen K, Nilsson M, Slim K. et al. Consensus guidelines for enhanced recovery after gastrectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. Br J Surg 2014; 101: 1209-1229
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Daenen C, Coimbra C, Hans G. et al. Labelling as reference Centre of GRACE (Groupe francophone de Réhabilitation Améliorée après ChirurgiE) for colorectal surgery: its impact on the implementation of enhanced recovery programme at the University Hospital of Liège. Acta Chir Belg 2018; 118: 294-298
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar