Segment Coordination Variability During Double Leg Bodyweight Squats at Different Tempos

Abstract

The aims of this study were twofold: 1) to examine lower extremity coordination during bodyweight squats performed at two different tempos, and 2) to establish a reliable measure of segment coordination variability. Eighteen subjects (10 F, 8 M) completed bodyweight squats at preferred (self-paced) and non-preferred (metronome-paced) tempos. A modified vector coding approach used kinematic data to compute absolute couplings patterns and coordination variability for three couplings (foot-shank, shank-thigh, thigh-trunk) in three planes of motion for the descent and ascent phases of a squat cycle. A coordination variability reliability equation was used to determine the number of squats needed for a reliable index of movement variability relative to total variability over 20 squats. Tempo did not significantly alter the absolute coordination patterns of any couplings. The reliability equation revealed that 5–9 squats were needed for a reliable coordination variability measure. Nine squats provided a reliable measure of coordination that is comparable to using 20 double leg squats in the calculation. Using nine squats ensures reliable calculations in the frontal, sagittal and transverse planes at preferred and non-preferred speeds. These results can be used to guide clinical evaluation of acceptable levels of movement variability during rehabilitation.

Key words

coordination variability - modified vector coding - bodyweight squats

• References

• 1 Davids K, Glazier P, Araujo D, Bartlett R. Movement systems as dynamical systems: The functional role of variability and its implication for sports medicine. Sport Med 2003; 33: 245-260
• 2 Stergiou N, Harbourne RT, Cavanaugh JT. Optimal movement variability: A new theoretical perspective for neurologic physical therapy. J Neurol Phys Ther 2006; 30: 120-129
• 3 Heiderscheit B, Hamill J, Emmerik Van R. Variability of stride characteristics and joint coordination among individuals. J Appl Biomech 2002; 18: 110-121
• 4 Pollard CD, Stearns KM, Hayes AT, Heiderscheit BC, Pollard CD, Stearns KM. Altered lower extremity movement variability in female soccer players during side-step cutting after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43: 460-465
• 5 Gautier G, Marin L, Leroy D, Thouvarecq R. Dynamics of expertise level: Coordination in handstand. Hum Mov Sci 2009; 28: 129-140
• 6 Seifert L, Button C, Davids K. Key properties of expert movement systems in sport: An ecological dynamics perspective. Sport Med 2013; 43: 167-178
• 7 Escamilla RF. Knee biomechanics of the dynamic squat exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33: 127-141
• 8 Schoenfeld BJ. Squatting kinematics and kinetics and their application to exercise performance. J Strength Cond Res 2010; 24: 3497-3506
• 9 Paterno MV, Kiefer AW, Bonnette S, Riley MA, Schmitt LC, Ford KR, Myer GD, Shockley K, Hewett TE. Prospectively identified deficits in sagittal plane hip-ankle coordination in female athletes who sustain a second anterior cruciate ligament injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and return to sport. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2015; 30: 1094-1101
• 10 Asgari M, Sanjari MA, Mokhtarinia HR, Moeini Sedeh S, Khalaf K, Parnianpour M. The effects of movement speed on kinematic variability and dynamic stability of the trunk in healthy individuals and low back pain patients. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2015; 30: 682-688
• 11 Hattin HC, Pierrynowski MR, Ball KA. Effect of load, cadence, and fatigue on tibio-femoral joint force during a half squat. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1989; 21: 613-618
• 12 Dahlkvist NJ, Mayo P, Seedhom BB. Forces during squatting and rising from a deep squat. Eng Med 1982; 11: 69-76
• 13 Hsu W-L, Chou L-S, Woollacott M. Age-related changes in joint coordination during balance recovery. Age (Dordr) 2013; 35: 1299-1309
• 14 Boyer KA, Freedman Silvernail J, Hamill J. Age and sex influences on running mechanics and coordination variability. J Sports Sci 2017; 35: 2225-2231
• 15 Hamill J, Palmer C, Emmerik Van REA. Coordinative variability and overuse injury. Sport Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol 2012; 4: 45
• 16 Sparrow WA, Donovan E, van Emmerik R, Barry EB. Using relative motion plots to measure changes in intra-limb and inter-limb coordination. J Mot Behav 1987; 19: 115-129
• 17 Hafer JF, Silvernail JF, Hillstrom HJ, Boyer KA. Changes in coordination and its variability with an increase in running cadence. J Sports Sci 2016; 34: 1388-1395
• 18 Seay JF, Van Emmerik REA, Hamill J. Low back pain status affects pelvis-trunk coordination and variability during walking and running. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2011; 26: 572-578
• 19 Hamill J, Van Emmerik REA, Heiderscheit BC, Li L. A dynamical system approach to lower extremity running injuries. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 1999; 14: 297-308
• 20 Hafer JF, Boyer KA. Variability of segment coordination using a vector coding technique: Reliability analysis for treadmill walking and running. Gait Posture 2017; 51: 222-227
• 21 Harriss D, Macsween A, Atkinson G. Standards for ethics in sport and exercise science research: 2018 update. Int J Sports Med 2017; 38: 1126-1131
• 22 Chehrehrazi M, Sanjari MA, Mokhtarinia HR, Jamshidi AA, Maroufi N, Parnianpour M. Goal equivalent manifold analysis of task performance in non-specific LBP and healthy subjects during repetitive trunk movement: Effect of load, velocity, symmetry. Hum Mov Sci 2017; 51: 72-81
• 23 Jordan K, Challis JH, Newell KM. Speed influences on the scaling behavior of gait cycle fluctuations during treadmill running. Hum Mov Sci 2007; 26: 87-102
• 24 Davids K, Glazier P, Ará Ujo D, Bartlett R. Movement systems as dynamical systems the functional role of variability and its implications for sports medicine. Sport Med 2003; 33: 245-260
• 25 Moraiti CO, Stergiou N, Vasiliadis HS, Motsis E, Georgoulis A. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction results in alterations in gait variability. Gait Posture 2010; 32: 169-175
• 26 Selles RW, Wagenaar RC, Smit TH, Wuisman PIJM. Disorders in trunk rotation during walking in patients with low back pain: A dynamical systems approach. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2001; 16: 175-181
• 27 Kurz MJ, Stergiou N, Buzzi UH, Georgoulis AD. The effect of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on lower extremity relative phase dynamics during walking and running. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2005; 13: 107-115
• 28 Miller RH, Chang R, Baird JL, Van Emmerik RE, Hamill J. Variability in kinematic coupling assessed by vector coding and continuous relative phase. J Biomech 2010; 43: 2554-2560
• 29 Needham R, Naemi R, Chockalingam N. Quantifying lumbar-pelvis coordination during gait using a modified vector coding technique. J Biomech 2014; 47: 1020-1026
• 30 Fleming BC, Oksendahl H, Beynnon BD. Open- or closed-kinetic chain exercises after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2005; 33: 134-140
• 31 Hodges PW, Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML. Lumbar spine: Treatment of instability and disorders of movement control. In: Magee DJ, Zachazewski JE, Quillen WS. (eds.). Pathology and Intervention in Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation. Saunders, Elseveir; 2009: 389-425