CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2019; 07(09): E1184-E1186
DOI: 10.1055/a-0959-6003
Editorial
Owner and Copyright © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019

Low-cost disposable endoscope: pros and cons

Mihai Ciocîrlan
“Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, “Agrippa Ionescu” Clinical Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Corresponding author

Mihai Ciocîrlan
“Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy
“Agrippa Ionescu” Clinical Emergency Hospital
7 Ion Mincu Street, Bucharest
Romania   

Publication History

Publication Date:
29 August 2019 (online)

 

Keith Obstein and collaborators from the Vanderbilt University, United States, have designed and developed a low-cost $ 35 disposable endoscope [1]. This endoscope uses a joystick-like driving mechanism which controls the endoscope tip. Their team proved its feasibility in examining the esophagus and the stomach of an ex-vivo phantom model. Unexperienced users had similar performance using a conventional scope and the new disposable scope and favor the later.

Conventional endoscopes have high acquisition costs –  20,000 to $ 40,000 for an upper endoscopy or colonoscopy tube and around $ 80,000 to $ 120,000 for a complete two-tube working system to explore both the upper and the lower gastrointestinal tract. Costs for an additional endoscopic ultrasound system are in the range of $ 200,000.

Use of conventional scopes requires higher levels of continuous training and skills, both for physicians and endoscopy nurses, especially for therapeutic procedures. The American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) training recommendations and competence evaluation include both quantitative and detailed qualitative examination criteria [2].

The workload, costs. and staff hazards associated with reprocessing conventional endoscopes are significant, and costs range between $ 140 and $ 280 per endoscope [3] [4]. Non-adherence to endoscope reprocessing guidelines together with failure to perform periodic maintenance and auditing may lead to cross-contamination [3]. In light of these disadvantages, there are potential advantages of using disposable endoscopes ([Table 1]). Available single-use disposable scopes are listed presented in [Table 2] [5] [6].

Table 1

Comparative analysis of reusable and single-use endoscopes.

Reusable endoscopes

Single-use endoscopes

High acquisition costs

Lower acquisition costs

Higher level of training and skills

Lower level of training and skills

High reprocessing costs (disinfection, surveillance, maintenance, repair)

No reprocessing costs

Risk of cross-contamination

No risk of cross-contamination

Impact on the environment?

Impact on the environment?

Table 2

Currently available disposable endoscopes.

Disposable scope name

PrimeSight TNE-500 esophagoscope (with EndoSheath)

E.G. II

aScope

Manufacturer

Laborie, Canada (acquired Cogentix, United States, in 2018)

IntroMedic, South Korea

Ambu, Denmark (acquired Invendo Medical, Germany, in 2017)

Availability

Discontinued [5]

Available

Projected in 2020 [6]

Outer diameter

4.7 mm and 5.4 mm (with working channel)

4 mm

6.2 mm, 5.4 mm, 4.2 mm[1]

Bending

2-way

2 way

2 way[1]

Bending angle

215° up and 140° down

210° up and down

180° up and 180° down[1]

Length

650 mm

1022 mm

600 mm[1]

Air inflation

Yes

Yes

Probably

Suction channel

Yes

No

Yes[1]

Biopsy capability

Yes

No

Yes[1]

Explores

Esophagus

Esophagus and partially the stomach and duodenum

Upper and lower gastrointestinal tract; an ERCP solution is also developed.

Cost of the disposable part

Sheath $ 40

Endoscope $ 100

$ 350[1]

Cost of the non-disposable part

System with endoscope $ 11,650

System $ 15,000

aView monitor $ 2600

Feasibility studies

[5]

[6]

Over 50 studies for bronchoscopy and ENT

1 Listed characteristics for aScope Broncho


The PrimeSight TNE-500 esophagoscope was discontinued in April 2018, the day that the Cogentix company was acquired by Laborie company [7]. This was not a disposable scope, but was only covered by a single-use plastic sheet (EndoSteath). A sheet version with a working channel for biopsy capability was also available. Several clinical studies were published using this esophagoscope, mainly for Barrett esophagus screening and surveillance. The cost of one EndoSheath was around $ 40.

E.G. II is a South Korean disposable $ 100 scope with the capability of examining the esophagus and partly the stomach and duodenum. There is no working channel with biopsy capability. The device is commercially available.

Ambu company, the Danish manufacturer of disposable ear, nose and throat scopes and bronchoscopes, projected the launch of disposable upper and lower gastrointestinal scopes by 2020 [8]. The current price for one disposable bronchoscope is $ 350. Disposable robotics colonoscopy systems are listed in [Table 3].

Table 3

Currently available robotic disposable colonoscopes.

Robotic disposable colonoscopy name

Aer-O-Scope

Endotics System

Invendoscope SC210

Manufacturer

GI View, Israel

Endotics, Italy

Ambu, Denmark (acquired Invendo Medical, Germany, in 2017)

Availability

Current version unavailable. New version projected for 2020.

Unknown, possibly available

Available

Features

Two working channels

One working channel

One working channel

Cost of the disposable part

Target projected price $ 250

Unknown

$ 350

Cost of the non-disposable part

Target projected price $ 15,000

Unknown

Invendo SPU E210, quote on demand.

Available human studies were done on approximately 100 patients before the year 2013 and no other data have become available since [9] [10] [11]. There are no published data on their use outside their initial development centers.

Cecal intubation rates for Aer-O-Scope, Endotics System and Invendoscope were 98.2 %, 93.1 % and 98.4 %, respectively, and mean time to reach the cecum was 14 minutes, 51 minutes, and 15 minutes, respectively.

The Invendoscope SC210 version is available for purchase for $ 350 together with the Invendo E210 guiding system. A new version of Aer-O-Scope has been tested and is projected to be marketed in 2020.

Returning to [Table 1], one of the concerns with low-cost disposable scopes may be plastic pollution. This may be an issue for the future as it recently has been shown that plastic microparticles may be traced in stools of humans around the globe [12]. EU has recently tackled this issue and banned single-use plastics [13].

A disruptive technology could change the face of endoscopy as we know it. Low-cost video-capsules or nanorobots with possibility of biopsy, tagging, and therapy may appear sometime. In the meantime, our core business is endoscopy and we should strive to improve it, maybe by transitioning to single-use instruments. For the moment, there is no way to predict the future of endoscopy, but it certainly is exciting.


#

Competing interests

None


Corresponding author

Mihai Ciocîrlan
“Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy
“Agrippa Ionescu” Clinical Emergency Hospital
7 Ion Mincu Street, Bucharest
Romania