Endoscopy 2019; 51(12): E382-E383
DOI: 10.1055/a-0956-6634
E-Videos
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Application of cholangioscope-compatible retrieval basket

Lawrence Ku
Division of Gastroenterology, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California, USA
,
Marco A. Paez
Division of Gastroenterology, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California, USA
,
Jonathan Kung
Division of Gastroenterology, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California, USA
,
Linda A. Hou
Division of Gastroenterology, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California, USA
,
Viktor E. Eysselein
Division of Gastroenterology, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California, USA
,
Sofiya Reicher
Division of Gastroenterology, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Corresponding author

Lawrence Ku, MD
Division of Gastroenterology-Medicine
Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
21840 South Normandie Ave, Ste 850
Torrance, CA 90502
USA   
Fax: +01-310-212-7837   

Publication History

Publication Date:
05 July 2019 (online)

 

The availability of single-operator cholangioscope-compatible accessories for object retrieval has been limited [1]. We present four cases where a recently introduced cholangioscope-specific basket (SpyGlass Retrieval Basket; Boston Scientific, USA), approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), was used for object retrieval under direct visualization.

Patient 1. A 29-year-old woman with right upper quadrant abdominal pain and a biliary stent that had been retained for 4 years was referred for stent removal. The initial removal attempt failed because of significant stent angulation and proximal stent migration ([Fig. 1 a]); an additional stent was placed to assure drainage prior to referral. The impacted stent ([Fig. 1 b]) was captured under direct visualization, using a cholangioscopic basket, and removed intact ([Video 1]).

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Patient 1: a Fluoroscopic image of migrated stent at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). b Impacted stent seen at cholangioscopy.

Video 1 Use of a cholangioscopy basket under direct visualization to capture and retrieve a migrated stent in one patient and cystic stone fragments in another.


Quality:

Patient 2. A 45-year-old woman with a biliary stent presented for removal of the stent after cholecystectomy. Cholangiography revealed retained large cystic duct stones ([Fig. 2 a]). The stones were fragmented with electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL), and the fragments were captured in the cystic duct, using the cholangioscopic basket, and removed ([Fig. 2 b], [Video 1]) [2].

Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Patient 2: a Large filling defects in the cystic duct, shown by ERCP fluoroscopy. b Cystic duct stones seen at cholangioscopy.

Patient 3. A 34-year-old woman who was 28 weeks pregnant presented with acute pancreatitis and biliary colic. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) revealed cholelithiasis and distal common bile duct (CBD) stone ([Fig. 3 a]). She underwent endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) without fluoroscopy [3]. EUS confirmed the MRCP findings ([Fig. 3 b]). Cholangioscopy demonstrated a mobile yellow stone, which was captured using a cholangioscopic basket under direct visualization and removed ([Fig. 3 c]). An extraction balloon was not used because of concern about impaction of the mobile stone when fluoroscopy would not be used. Cholecystectomy immediately followed. The patient had uncomplicated delivery at term.

Zoom Image
Fig. 3 Patient 3: a Cholelithiasis and distal common bile duct stone seen at magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). b Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) confirmation of MRCP findings. c Stone capture and removal using cholangioscopic basket.

Patient 4. A 52-year-old man with alcoholic cirrhosis (Model for End-Stage Liver Disease [MELD] score 17) presented with cholecystitis and choledocholithiasis. The patient was not considered to be an optimal surgical candidate. Cystic duct clearance was achieved with multiple stones being captured and removed using the cholangioscopic basket under direct visualization ([Fig. 4]) [4].

Zoom Image
Fig. 4 Patient 4: stone captured with cholangioscopic basket.

The cholangioscopic basket is a useful accessory for object removal under direct visualization and has expanded the therapeutic uses of cholangioscopy.

Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AR_2AH

Endoscopy E-Videos
https://eref.thieme.de/e-videos

Endoscopy E-Videos is a free access online section, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high
quality video and all contributions are
freely accessible online.

This section has its own submission
website at
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos


#

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

  • References

  • 1 Manes G, Paspatis G, Aabakken L. et al. Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 472-491
  • 2 Sejpal D, Trindade A, Lee C. et al. Digital cholangioscopy can detect residual biliary stones missed by occlusion cholangiogram in ERCP: a prospective tandem study. Endosc Int Open 2019; 07: E608-E614
  • 3 Cappell M, Stavropoulos S, Friedel D. Systematic review of safety and efficacy of therapeutic endoscopic-retrograde-cholangiopancreatography during pregnancy including studies of radiation-free therapeutic endoscopic-retrograde-cholangiopancreatography. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 10: 308-321
  • 4 Buxbaum J, Abbas FehmiS, Sultan S. et al. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee. ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89: 1075-1105.e15

Corresponding author

Lawrence Ku, MD
Division of Gastroenterology-Medicine
Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
21840 South Normandie Ave, Ste 850
Torrance, CA 90502
USA   
Fax: +01-310-212-7837   

  • References

  • 1 Manes G, Paspatis G, Aabakken L. et al. Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 472-491
  • 2 Sejpal D, Trindade A, Lee C. et al. Digital cholangioscopy can detect residual biliary stones missed by occlusion cholangiogram in ERCP: a prospective tandem study. Endosc Int Open 2019; 07: E608-E614
  • 3 Cappell M, Stavropoulos S, Friedel D. Systematic review of safety and efficacy of therapeutic endoscopic-retrograde-cholangiopancreatography during pregnancy including studies of radiation-free therapeutic endoscopic-retrograde-cholangiopancreatography. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 10: 308-321
  • 4 Buxbaum J, Abbas FehmiS, Sultan S. et al. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee. ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89: 1075-1105.e15

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Patient 1: a Fluoroscopic image of migrated stent at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). b Impacted stent seen at cholangioscopy.
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Patient 2: a Large filling defects in the cystic duct, shown by ERCP fluoroscopy. b Cystic duct stones seen at cholangioscopy.
Zoom Image
Fig. 3 Patient 3: a Cholelithiasis and distal common bile duct stone seen at magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). b Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) confirmation of MRCP findings. c Stone capture and removal using cholangioscopic basket.
Zoom Image
Fig. 4 Patient 4: stone captured with cholangioscopic basket.