Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-0900-4130
Stellenwert der ST-Arthroplastik in der Therapie der STT-Arthrose bei gleichzeitiger Rhizarthrose
Importance of ST arthroplasty in the treatment of STT osteoarthritis and concomitant basal thumb osteoarthritisPublication History
14 January 2019
20 April 2019
Publication Date:
05 June 2019 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/hamipla/201903/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055-a-0900-4130-1.jpg)
Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund Die Rhizarthrose gehört zu den häufigsten Arthroseformen. Nicht selten besteht gleichzeitig auch eine STT-Arthrose. Als operativer Goldstandard gelten die verschiedenen Modifikationen der Resektionsarthroplastik. In einer retrospektiven Studie wurden die postoperativen Ergebnisse der Resektions-Suspensions-Arthroplastik (RSA) nach Lundborg, modifiziert nach Wulle mit und ohne zusätzliche ST-Arthroplastik miteinander verglichen.
Patienten und Methoden Im Rahmen der Studie wurden 50 Patienten mit symptomatischer Daumensattelgelenksarthrose (Stadium III und IV) nachuntersucht. Davon sind 21 Patienten mittels konventioneller modifizierter Resektions-Suspensions-Arthroplastik nach Lundborg (RSA) und 29 Patienten mit derselben Technik und zusätzlicher ST-Arthroplastik (RSA-plus) operiert worden. Es wurden der TDX-Score (Thumb Disability Examination-Score), der Kapandji-Score, das Schmerzniveau und die Kraft im Grobgriff, im Schlüsselgriff, im palmaren Spitzgriff und im Dreifingerspitzgriff erhoben.
Ergebnisse In beiden Gruppen war die Schnitt-Naht-Zeit vergleichbar. Der Gesamt-TDX-Score betrug für die RSA-plus-Gruppe 15,9 ± 19,5 und für die RSA-Gruppe 20,8 ± 24,3 (p > 0,05). Einen marginal signifikanten Unterschied zeigte der Kapandji-Score in der RSA-plus-Gruppe mit 9,5 ± 1,1 und in der RSA-Gruppe mit 8,9 ± 1,6 (p = 0,08). Die Kraft im Grobgriff (RSA-plus: 48,3 ± 21 kPa, RSA: 55,2 ± 24,9 kPa (p > 0,05)), im Schlüsselgriff (RSA-plus: 32,6 ± 15 kPa, RSA: 37,3 ± 15,4 kPa (p > 0,05)), im palmaren Spitzgriff (RSA-plus: 30,6 ± 12,9 kPa, RSA: 34,8 ± 12,4 kPa (p > 0,05)) sowie im Dreifingerspitzgriff (RSA-plus: 36,2 ± 14,2 kPa, RSA: 42 ± 13,6 kPa (p > 0,05)) wiesen in beiden Gruppen keine signifikanten Unterschiede auf. Die Schmerzintensität in Ruhe (RSA-plus: 0,4 ± 1,3, RSA: 1 ± 2,1 (p > 0,05)), bei Bewegung (RSA-plus: 0,7 ± 1,8, RSA: 1,6 ± 2,7 (p > 0,05)) und bei Belastung (RSA-plus: 1,6 ± 2,5, RSA: 2,9 ± 3,4 (p > 0,05)) zeigten sich in beiden Gruppen insignifikant unterschiedlich.
Zusammenfassung In den nachuntersuchten Patientengruppen zeigten sich keine signifikanten Unterschiede in den untersuchten Variablen. Wir stellen somit fest, dass keine Nachteile bestehen eine zusätzliche ST-Arthroplastik zur konventionellen Resektions-Suspensions-Arthroplastik durchzuführen. Wir sind aufgrund der erhobenen Daten der Ansicht, dass die Indikation zur ST-Arthroplastik im Rahmen der RSA großzügig gestellt werden sollte.
Abstract
Background Basal thumb osteoarthritis is one of the most prevalent forms of osteoarthritis worldwide and is frequently associated with osteoarthritis of the STT joint. The surgical gold standard comprises various modifications of arthroplasty resection. A retrospective study compared the postoperative results of Lundborg’s resection-suspension-arthroplasty, modified by Wulle, with and without additional ST arthroplasty.
Patients and Methods In this study, 50 patients with symptomatic basal thumb osteoarthritis (stages III and IV) were examined. Twenty-one of them were treated with conventional resection-suspension-arthroplasty (RSA) and 29 patients were treated with the same technique and additional ST arthroplasty (RSA-plus). The analysis included an assessment of the Thumb Disability Examination (TDX) score, the Kapandji Thumb Opposition score, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score as well as grip force, key pinch force, two-point and three-point pinch force.
Results In both groups, the duration of the operation was comparable. The overall TDX score was 15.9 ± 19.5 in the RSA-plus group and 20.8 ± 24.3 in the RSA group (p > 0.05). A marginally significant difference was noted for the Kapandji score, which was 9.5 ± 1.1 in the RSA-plus group and 8.9 ± 1.6 in the RSA group (p = 0.08). There was no significant difference between both groups for grip strength (RSA-plus: 48.3 ± 21 kPa, RSA: 55.2 ± 24.9 kPa (p > 0.05)), key pinch force (RSA-plus: 32.6 ± 15 kPa, RSA: 37.3 ± 15.4 kPa (p > 0.05)), two-point pinch force (RSA-plus: 30.6 ± 12.9 kPa, RSA: 34.8 ± 12.4 kPa (p > 0.05)) and three-point pinch force (RSA-plus: 36.2 ± 14.2 kPa, RSA: 42 ± 13.6 kPa (p > 0.05)). Both groups demonstrated insignificant differences in pain intensity at rest (RSA-plus: 0.4 ± 1.3, RSA: 1 ± 2.1 (p > 0.05)), during movement (RSA-plus: 0.7 ± 1.8, RSA: 1.6 ± 2.7 (p > 0.05)) and under stress (RSA-plus: 1.6 ± 2.5, RSA: 2.9 ± 3.4 (p > 0.05)).
Conclusion The followed-up patient groups demonstrated no significant differences in the examined variables. This leads us to the conclusion that there are no disadvantages associated with performing ST arthroplasty in addition to conventional RSA. In fact, based on the collected data, we suggest that ST arthroplasty should be more widely indicated in the context of RSA.
-
Literatur
- 1 Armstrong AL, Hunter JB, Davis TR. The prevalence of degenerative arthritis of the base of the thumb in post-menopausal women. J Hand Surg Br 1994; 19: 340-341
- 2 Eaton RG, Littler JW. Ligament reconstruction for the painful thumb carpometacarpal joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1973; 55: 1655-1666
- 3 Fontana L, Neel S, Claise JM. et al. Osteoarthritis of the thumb carpometacarpal joint in women and occupational risk factors: a case-control study. J Hand Surg Am 2007; 32: 459-465
- 4 Manara M, Bortoluzzi A, Favero M. et al. Italian Society for Rheumatology recommendations for the management of hand osteoarthritis. Reumatismo 2013; 65: 167-185
- 5 Botha-Scheepers S, Riyazi N, Watt I. et al. Progression of hand osteoarthritis over 2 years: a clinical and radiological follow-up study. Ann Rheum Dis 2009; 68: 1260-1264
- 6 Riyazi N, Rosendaal FR, Slagboom E. et al. Risk factors in familial osteoarthritis: the GARP sibling study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008; 16: 654-659
- 7 Jensen V, Boggild H, Johansen JP. Occupational use of precision grip and forceful gripping, and arthrosis of finger joints: a literature review. Occup Med (Lond) 1999; 49: 383-388
- 8 Dahaghin S, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Ginai AZ. et al. Prevalence and pattern of radiographic hand osteoarthritis and association with pain and disability (the Rotterdam study). Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64: 682-687
- 9 Zhang W, Doherty M, Leeb BF. et al. EULAR evidence based recommendations for the management of hand osteoarthritis: report of a Task Force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis 2007; 66: 377-388
- 10 Mentzel M, Ebinger T, Heckmann E. et al. Ergebnisse nach Rhizarthrosebehandlung - Vergleich der Aufhängeplastik nach Epping mit der alleinigen Trapezektomie. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2001; 33: 176-180
- 11 Bakri K, Moran SL. Thumb carpometacarpal arthritis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135: 508-520
- 12 Nylen S, Juhlin LJ, Lugnegard H. Weilby tendon interposition arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the trapezial joints. J Hand Surg Br 1987; 12: 68-72
- 13 Epping W, Noack G. Die operative Behandlung der Sattelgelenksarthrose. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 1983; 15: 168-176
- 14 Sigfusson R, Lundborg G. Abductor pollicis longus tendon arthroplasty for treatment of arthrosis in the first carpometacarpal joint. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1991; 25: 73-77
- 15 Wulle C. Die Abductor pollicis longus-Plastik zur Behandlung der Daumensattelgelenkarthrose. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 1993; 25: 250-255
- 16 Katzel EB, Bielicka D, Shakir S. et al. Midcarpal and Scaphotrapeziotrapezoid Arthritis in Patients with Carpometacarpal Arthritis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137: 1793-1798
- 17 Warganich T, Shin AY. A Technique for the Management of Concomitant Scaphotrapezoid Arthritis in Patients With Thumb Metacarpotrapezial Arthritis: Interposition Arthroplasty With a Capitate Suture Anchor. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2017; 21: 71-74
- 18 Eaton RG, Lane LB, Littler JW. et al. Ligament reconstruction for the painful thumb carpometacarpal joint: a long-term assessment. J Hand Surg Am 1984; 9: 692-699
- 19 Burton RI, Pellegrini Jr VD. Surgical management of basal joint arthritis of the thumb. Part II. Ligament reconstruction with tendon interposition arthroplasty. J Hand Surg Am 1986; 11: 324-332
- 20 Wolf JM. Treatment of scaphotrapezio-trapezoid arthritis. Hand Clin 2008; 24: 301-306 vii
- 21 Outerbridge RE. The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1961; 43-B: 752-757
- 22 Noback PC, Lombardi JM, Seetharaman M. et al. Development and Validation of a Disease-Specific Questionnaire for Basal Joint Arthritis. J Wrist Surg 2017; 6: 126-133
- 23 Bijur PE, Silver W, Gallagher EJ. Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med 2001; 8: 1153-1157
- 24 Kapandji A. Cotation clinique de l’opposition et de la contre-opposition du pouce. Ann Chir Main 1986; 5: 67-73
- 25 Desrosiers J, Hebert R, Bravo G. et al. Comparison of the Jamar dynamometer and the Martin vigorimeter for grip strength measurements in a healthy elderly population. Scand J Rehabil Med 1995; 27: 137-143
- 26 Neumann S, Kwisda S, Krettek C. et al. Comparison of the Grip Strength Using the Martin-Vigorimeter and the JAMAR-Dynamometer: Establishment of Normal Values. In Vivo 2017; 31: 917-924
- 27 Wajon A, Vinycomb T, Carr E. et al. Surgery for thumb (trapeziometacarpal joint) osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004631.pub4: CD004631
- 28 Sodha S, Ring D, Zurakowski D. et al. Prevalence of osteoarthrosis of the trapeziometacarpal joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87: 2614-2618