Download PDF
Arquivos Internacionais de Otorrinolaringologia 2012; 16(01): 026-031
DOI: 10.7162/S1809-48722012000100003
Original Article
Thieme Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

What are the audiometric frequencies affected are the responsible for the hearing complaint in the hearing loss for ototoxicity after the oncological treatment?

Quais as frequências audiométricas acometidas são responsáveis pela queixa auditiva nas disacusias por ototoxicidade após o tratamento oncológico?
Patricia Helena Pecora Liberman
1   Master in Sciences. Speech Therapy.
,
M. Valeria Schmidt Goffi-Gomez
2   PhD in Communication Disorder Sciences. Speech Therapist.
,
Christiane Schultz
1   Master in Sciences. Speech Therapy.
,
Luiz Fernando Lopes
3   PhD in Medicine. Pediatric Oncology.
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

10 May 2011

21 August 2011

Publication Date:
12 February 2014 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Introduction: The neurosensory bilateral simetric hearing loss resulting of the oncological treatment is underestimated, because the patients has the hearing detection preserved, reporting complaints in determined situation, or the not comprehension of part of the message.

Objective: Investigate which are the audiometric frequencies affected are the responsible by the presence of hearing complaints.

Method: Prospective study evaluating 200 patients with cancer in the childhood out of the oncological treatment in at least 8 years, with average age to the diagnosis of 6,21 years (4,71). Was applied anamnesis to investigate the presence of hearing complaints and performed a tonal threshold audiometry. To check the association between the complaint and the hearing loss, was applied the Exact test of Fisher, with one error a = 5%, the patients were split into: normal hearing, hearing loss in 8kHz, loss in 6-8 kHz, loss in 4-8 kHz, loss in 2-8 kHz and loss in ≤ 1-8 kHz.

Results: We found 125 patients with hearing loss, 10 presented hearing complaints. Between the patients with hearing loss, 16 presented loss only at 8kHz, and 1 with complaint; 22 with loss in 6-8 kHz, being 3 with complaint; 16 with loss in 4-8 kHz, from them 10 with complaint; 15 with loss 2-8 kHz, being 14 with complaint and 6 with loss in  ≤ 1-8 kHz all with complaints. There were a significant relationship between the loss and hearing complaint (p < 0,001), when the frequency of 4 kHz was involved.

Conclusion: The bigger the number of affected frequencies the bigger the occurrence of hearing complaint, most of all when the speech frequencies are involved, and the involvement of 4 kHz already determines the appearing of the complaints.

Resumo

Introdução: A perda auditiva neurossensorial bilateral simétrica resultante do tratamento oncológico é subestimada, pois os pacientes têm a detecção auditiva preservada, relatando queixa em determinadas situações, ou a não compreensão de parte da mensagem.

Objetivo: Investigar quais as frequências audiométricas acometidas são responsáveis pela presença de queixa auditiva.

Método: Estudo prospectivo avaliando 200 pacientes com câncer na infância fora de tratamento oncológico há no mínimo 8 anos, com idade média ao diagnóstico de 6,21 anos (4,71). Foi aplicada anamnese para investigar a presença de queixa auditiva e realizada audiometria tonal limiar. Para verificar a associação entre queixa e perda auditiva, foi empregado o teste exato de Fisher, com um erro a = 5%. Os pacientes foram divididos em: audição normal, perda auditiva em 8kHz, perda em 6-8kHz, perda em 4-8kHz, perda em 2-8kHz e perda em ≤1-8kHz.

Resultados: Encontramos 125 pacientes com audição normal, 10 apresentaram queixa auditiva. Entre os pacientes com perda auditiva, 16 apresentaram perda somente em 8kHz, e 1 com queixa; 22 com perda em 6-8kHz, sendo 3 com queixa; 16 com perda em 4-8kHz, destes 10 com queixa; 15 com perda 2-8kHz, sendo 14 com queixa e 6 com perda em ≤1-8kHz todos com queixa. Houve relação estatisticamente significante entre perda e queixa auditiva (p < 0.001), quando a frequência de 4kHz foi envolvida.

Conclusão: Quanto maior o número de frequências acometidas maior a ocorrência de queixa auditiva, sobretudo quando as frequências da fala estão envolvidas, sendo que o acometimento de 4kHz já determina o aparecimento das queixas.

Keywords

bilateral hearing loss - neurosensory hearing loss - oncology - health impacts

Palavras-chave

perda auditiva bilateral - perda auditiva neurossensorial - oncologia - impactos na saúde
 

  • Bibliographic References

  • 1 Santin JC, Deheinzelin D, Junior SP , et al. Late echocardiography assessment of systolic and diastolic function of the left ventricle in pediatric cancer survivors after anthracycline therapy. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2007; 29: 761-5
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Rigon H, Lopes LF, do Rosario Latorre M, de Camargo B. The Gepetto program for surveillance of long-term survivors of childhood cancer: preliminary report from a single institution in Brazil. Med Pediatr Oncol 2003; 40: 405-6
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Pinto VMC. Efeitos tardios dentais e maxilofaciais em pacientes tratados de leucemias agudas na infância. São Paulo; 2005. [Dissertação de Mestrado-Fundação Antônio Prudente].
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Garcia VP, Martinez AF, Agusti EB, Mencía LA, Asenjo VP. Drug-induced ototoxicy: current Status. Acta Otolaryngol 2001; 121: 569-72
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Simon T, Hero B, Dupuis W, Selle B, Berthold F. The incidence of hearing impairment after successful treatment of neuroblastoma. Klin Padiatr 2002; 214: 149-52
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Skinner R. Best practice in assessing ototoxicity in children with cancer. Eur J Cancer 2004; 40: 2352-4
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Biro K, Noszek L, Prekopp P, Nagyiványi K, Géczi L, Gaudi I, Bodrogi I. Characteristics and risk factors of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in testicular cancer patients detected by distortion product otoacoustic emission. Oncology 2006; 70 (3) 177-84
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Schochat E. Percepção da fala em perdas auditivas neurossensoriais. In: Lichtig I, Carvallo RMM, , editores. Audição: abordagens atuais. São Paulo: Pró-Fono; 1997. , p.223–35.
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Schultz C, Goffi-Gomez MV, Pecora Liberman PH, Pellizzon AC, Carvalho AL. Hearing loss and complaint in patients with head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010; 136 (11) 1065-9
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Schultz C, Goffi-Gomez MV, Liberman PH, Carvalho AL. Report on hearing loss in oncology. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2009; 75 (5) 634-41
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Arora R, Thakur JS, Azad RK, Mohindroo NK, Sharma DR, Seam RK. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy: Add high-frequency audiometry in the regimen. Indian J Cancer 2009; 46 (4) 311-7
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Vermorken JB, Remenar E, van Herpen C, Gorlia T, Mesia R, Degardin M , et al. Study Group. Cisplatin, fluorouracil, and docetaxel in unresectable head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med 2007; 357 (17) 1695-704
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Fernandes LC, Santos TMM. Zumbido e audição normal: estudo da supressão das emissões otoacústicas transientes. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2009; 75 (3) 414-419
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Urnau D, Silva PAB, Seligman L. Influência do zumbido no índice percentual de reconhecimento de fala em pacientes normo-ouvintes. Arq Int Otorrinolaringol 2010; 14 (4) 450-455
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Teixeira AR, Freitas CLR, Millão LF, Gonçalves AK, Junior BB, Santos AMPV , et al. Relação entre a Queixa e a Presença de Perda Auditiva entre Idosos. Arq Int Otorrinolaringol 2009; 13 (1) 78-82
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Amorim RB, Lopes AC, Santos KTP, Melo ADP, Lauris JRP. Alterações auditivas da exposição ocupacional em músicos. Arq Int Otorrinolaringol 2008; 12 (3) 377-383
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Calviti KCFK, Pereira LD. Sensibilidade, especificidade e valores preditivos da queixa auditiva comparados com diferentes médias audiométricas. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2009; 75 (6) 794-800
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Samelli AG, Negretti CA, Ueda KS, Moreira RR, Schochat E. Comparação entre avaliação audiológica e screening: um estudo sobre presbiacusia. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2011; 77 (1) 70-76
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Liberman PH, Schultz C, Goffi-Gomez MV, Carvalho AL, Pellizzon AC, Testa JR , et al. Auditory effects after organ preservation protocol for laryngeal/hypopharyngeal carcinomas. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130 (11) 1265-8
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Liberman PHP, Schultz C, Goffi-Gomez MVS, Antoneli CGB, Chojniak MM, Novaes PE. Evaluation of ototoxicity in children treated for retinoblastoma: preliminary results of a systematic audiological evaluation. Clinical Translational Oncology 2011; 5: 348-352
    Google Scholar