Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.5999/aps.2021.01466
Division of a single free flap in multiple digit reconstruction
Background Single free flaps are a commonly used reconstructive method for multiple soft tissue defects in digits. We analyzed the flap size, division timing, and degree of necrosis in cases with various types of flap division.
Methods We conducted a retrospective review of the medical charts of patients who had undergone single free flap reconstruction for multiple soft tissue defects across their digits from 2011 to 2020. The flap types included were the lateral arm free flap, venous forearm free flap, thenar free flap, hypothenar free flap, anterolateral thigh free flap, medial plantar free flap, and second toe pulp free flap. Flap size, anastomosed vessels, division timing, and occurrence of flap necrosis were retrospectively investigated and then analyzed using the t-test.
Results In total, 75 patients were included in the analysis. The success rate of the free flaps was 97.3%. All flaps were successfully divided after at least 17 days, with a mean of 47.17 days (range, 17–243 days) for large flaps and 42.81 days (range, 20–130 days) for the medium and small flaps (P=0.596). The mean area of flap necrosis was 2.38% in the large flaps and 2.58% in the medium and small flaps (P=0.935). Severe necrosis of the divided flap developed in two patients who had undergone flap division at week 6 and week 34.
Conclusions In cases where blood flow to the flap has been stable for more than 3 weeks, flap division can be safely attempted regardless of the flap size.
Publication History
Received: 29 July 2021
Accepted: 22 October 2021
Article published online:
02 June 2022
© 2022. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
REFERENCES
- 1 Hsu WM, Wei FC, Lin CH. et al. The salvage of a degloved hand skin flap by arteriovenous shunting. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 98: 146-50
- 2 Thomas BP, Katsarma E, Tsai TM. Replantation of total degloving of the hand: case report. J Reconstr Microsurg 2003; 19: 217-20
- 3 Rodriguez-Lorenzo A, Lin CH, Lin CH. et al. Replantation of a degloved hand with added arteriovenous anastomoses: report of two cases. J Hand Surg Am 2009; 34: 1864-7
- 4 Lo S, Lin YT, Lin CH. et al. A new classification to aid the selection of revascularization techniques in major degloving injuries of the upper limb. Injury 2013; 44: 331-5
- 5 Ulrich D, Pallua N. Treatment of avulsion injury of three fingers with a compound thoracodorsal artery perforator flap including serratus anterior fascia. Microsurgery 2009; 29: 556-9
- 6 Sukop A, Tvrdek M, Duskova M. et al. Degloving injury: the use of a combination of free fasciocutaneous sensitive flap and pedicle flaps for reconstruction. Acta Chir Plast 2005; 47: 107-11
- 7 Chen SL, Chou GH, Chen TM. et al. Salvage of completely degloved finger with a posterior interosseous free flap. Br J Plast Surg 2001; 54: 69-71
- 8 Takeuchi M, Sakurai H, Sasaki K. et al. Treatment of finger avulsion injuries with innervated arterialized venous flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106: 881-5
- 9 Gatti JE, LaRossa D, Brousseau DA. et al. Assessment of neovascularization and timing of flap division. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 73: 396-402
- 10 Kim KS, Kim ES, Hwang JH. et al. Fingertip reconstruction using the hypothenar perforator free flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013; 66: 1263-70
- 11 Senda H, Muro H, Terada S. et al. A case of degloving injury of the whole hand reconstructed by a combination of distant flaps comprising an anterolateral thigh flap and a groin flap. J Reconstr Microsurg 2011; 27: 299-302
- 12 Wink JD, Gandhi RA, Ashley B. et al. Flap reconstruction of the hand. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145: 172e-183e
- 13 Brent B, Upton J, Acland RD. et al. Experience with the temporoparietal fascial free flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985; 76: 177-88
- 14 German W, Finesilver EM, Davis JS. Establishment of circulation in tubed skin flaps: an experimental study. Arch Surg 1933; 26: 27-40
- 15 Douglas B, Buchholz RR. The blood circulation in pedicle flaps: an accurate test for determining its efficiency. Ann Surg 1943; 117: 692-709
- 16 Hynes W. The rapid transfer of abdominal tubed pedicles. Br J Plast Surg 1949; 2: 202-11
- 17 Hynes W. A simple method of estimating blood flow with special reference to the circulation in pedicled skin flaps and tubes. Plast Reconstr Surg 1949; 4: 306
- 18 Klingenstrom P, Nylen B. Timing of transfer of tubed pedicles and cross-flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1966; 37: 1-12
- 19 Mandelbaum M, Lakhiani C, Lenert JJ. Is 21 days too short? Utility of indocyanine green angiography in predicting successful cross-leg flap division in the compromised lower extremity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 147: 919e-920e
- 20 Zelken JA, Chang NJ, Wei FC. et al. The combined ALT-groin flap for the mutilated and degloved hand. Injury 2015; 46: 1591-6
- 21 Tuncer S, Findikcioglu K, Ayhan S. Upper extremity reconstruction with pedicled anterolateral thigh perforator flap: a simple modification for a difficult situation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008; 61: 1119-21
- 22 Trovato MJ, Brooks D, Buntic RF. et al. Simultaneous coverage of two separate dorsal digital defects with a syndactylizing venous free flap. Microsurgery 2008; 28: 248-51