RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.5999/aps.2020.01844
Computerized Sunnybrook facial grading scale (SBface) application for facial paralysis evaluation
Background The Sunnybrook facial grading scale is a comprehensive scale for the evaluation of facial paralysis patients. Its results greatly depend on subjective input. This study aimed to develop and validate an automated Sunnybrook facial grading scale (SBface) to more objectively assess disfigurement due to facial paralysis.
Methods An application compatible with iOS version 11.0 and up was developed. The software automatically detected facial features in standardized photographs and generated scores following the Sunnybrook facial grading scale. Photographic data from 30 unilateral facial paralysis patients were randomly sampled for validation. Intrarater reliability was tested by conducting two identical tests at a 2-week interval. Interrater reliability was tested between the software and three facial nerve clinicians.
Results A beta version of the SBface application was tested. Intrarater reliability showed excellent congruence between the two tests. Moderate to strong positive correlations were found between the software and an otolaryngologist, including the total scores of the three individual software domains and composite scores. However, 74.4% (29/39) of the subdomain items showed low to zero correlation with the human raters (κ<0.2). The correlations between the human raters showed good congruence for most of the total and composite scores, with 10.3% (4/39) of the subdomain items failing to correspond (κ<0.2).
Conclusions The SBface application is efficient and accurate for evaluating the degree of facial paralysis based on the Sunnybrook facial grading scale. However, correlations of the software-derived results with those of human raters are limited by the software algorithm and the raters’ inconsistency.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 26. September 2020
Angenommen: 24. Februar 2021
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
21. März 2022
© 2021. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
REFERENCES
- 1 House JW. Facial nerve grading systems. Laryngoscope 1983; 93: 1056-69
- 2 House JW, Brackmann DE. Facial nerve grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1985; 93: 146-7
- 3 Yanagihara N. Grading of facial palsy. Fisch U. Facial nerve surgery Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Facial Nerve Surgery, Zurich, 1976 Amstelveen: Kugler Medical Publications; 1977: 533-5
- 4 Ross BG, Fradet G, Nedzelski JM. Development of a sensitive clinical facial grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996; 114: 380-6
- 5 Banks CA, Bhama PK, Park J. et al. Clinician-graded electronic facial paralysis assessment: the eFACE. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 136: 223e-230e
- 6 Berg T, Jonsson L, Engstrom M. Agreement between the Sunnybrook, House-Brackmann, and Yanagihara facial nerve grading systems in Bell’s palsy. Otol Neurotol 2004; 25: 1020-6
- 7 Fattah AY, Gurusinghe ADR, Gavilan J. et al. Facial nerve grading instruments: systematic review of the literature and suggestion for uniformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135: 569-79
- 8 Neely JG, Cherian NG, Dickerson CB. et al. Sunnybrook facial grading system: reliability and criteria for grading. Laryngoscope 2010; 120: 1038-45
- 9 Gaudin RA, Robinson M, Banks CA. et al. Emerging vs timetested methods of facial grading among patients with facial paralysis. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2016; 18: 251-7
- 10 Chee GH, Nedzelski JM. Facial nerve grading systems. Facial Plast Surg 2000; 16: 315-24
- 11 Burres S, Fisch U. The comparison of facial grading systems. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986; 112: 755-8
- 12 Lee LN, Susarla SM, H-Hohman M. et al. A comparison of facial nerve grading systems. Ann Plast Surg 2013; 70: 313-6
- 13 Kanerva M, Poussa T, Pitkaranta A. Sunnybrook and HouseBrackmann facial grading systems: intrarater repeatability and interrater agreement. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006; 135: 865-71
- 14 Chong LSH, Eviston TJ, Low TH. et al. Validation of the clinician-graded electronic facial paralysis assessment. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140: 159-67
- 15 Banks CA, Jowett N, Azizzadeh B. et al. Worldwide testing of the eFACE facial nerve clinician-graded scale. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139: 491e-498e
- 16 O’Reilly BF, Soraghan JJ, McGrenary S. et al. Objective method of assessing and presenting the House-Brackmann and regional grades of facial palsy by production of a facogram. Otol Neurotol 2010; 31: 486-91
- 17 Meier-Gallati V, Scriba H. Objective assessment of the reliability of the House-Brackmann and Fisch grading of synkinesis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 274: 4217-23
- 18 Baude M, Hutin E, Gracies JM. A bidimensional system of facial movement analysis conception and reliability in adults. Biomed Res Int 2015; 2015: 812961
- 19 Mothes O, Modersohn L, Volk GF. et al. Automated objective and marker-free facial grading using photographs of patients with facial palsy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2019; 276: 3335-43