Myelomeningocele defect reconstruction with keystone flaps: vascular rationale for the design and operative technique

Background Myelomeningocele is a frequently seen condition at tertiary care hospitals. Its treatment involves a variety of plastic reconstructive techniques. Herein, we present a series of myelomeningocele patients treated using keystone flaps.

Methods We gathered information regarding soft tissue reconstruction and the use of bilateral keystone flaps to treat myelomeningocele patients. We obtained data from clinical records and recorded the demographic characteristics of mothers and children with the condition. The size, level of defect, and complications detected during the follow-up were analyzed.

Results A series of seven patients who underwent bilateral keystone flaps for myelomeningocele closure was analyzed. There were no cases of midline or major dehiscence, flap loss, necrosis, surgical site infections, or cerebrospinal fluid leakage. No revision procedures were performed. Minor complications included one case with minimal seroma and three cases with areas of peripheral dehiscence that healed easily using conventional measures.

Conclusions The use of keystone flaps is an adequate option for closure of dorsal midline soft tissue defects related to myelomeningocele. This technique offers predictable results with an acceptable spectrum of complications. Robust blood flow can be predicted based upon anatomical knowledge.

Keywords

Surgery, plastic - Spinal dysraphism - Meningomyelocele - Surgical flaps

Publication History

Received: 22 August 2020

Accepted: 24 February 2021

Article published online:
21 March 2022

• REFERENCES

• 1 Mitchell LE, Adzick NS, Melchionne J. et al. Spina bifida. Lancet 2004; 364: 1885-95
• 2 Copp AJ, Adzick NS, Chitty LS. et al. Spina bifida. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2015; 1: 15007
• 3 Chitayat D, Matsui D, Amitai Y. et al. Folic acid supplementation for pregnant women and those planning pregnancy: 2015 update. J Clin Pharmacol 2016; 56: 170-5
• 4 Sharrard WJ, Zachary RB, Lorber J. Survival and paralysis in open myelomeningocele with special reference to the time of repair of the spinal lesion. Dev Med Child Neurol 1967; Suppl 13: 35-50
• 5 Adzick NS, Thom EA, Spong CY. et al. A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 993-1004
• 6 Ozcelik D, Yildiz KH, Is M. et al. Soft tissue closure and plastic surgical aspects of large dorsal myelomeningocele defects (review of techniques). Neurosurg Rev 2005; 28: 218-25
• 7 Duffy Jr FJ, Weprin BE, Swift DM. A new approach to closure of large lumbosacral myelomeningoceles: the superior gluteal artery perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114: 1864-8
• 8 Iacobucci JJ, Marks MW, Argenta LC. Anatomic studies and clinical experience with fasciocutaneous flap closure of large myelomeningoceles. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 97: 1400-8
• 9 Kiil BJ, Rozen WM, Pan WR. et al. The lumbar artery perforators: a cadaveric and clinical anatomical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123: 1229-38
• 10 Isik D, Tekes L, Eseoglu M. et al. Closure of large myelomeningocele defects using dorsal intercostal artery perforator flap. Ann Plast Surg 2011; 67: 159-63
• 11 Abraham JT, Saint-Cyr M. Keystone and pedicle perforator flaps in reconstructive surgery: new modifications and applications. Clin Plast Surg 2017; 44: 385-402
• 12 Gomez OJ, Baron OI, Penarredonda ML. Keystone flap: overcoming paradigms. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019; 7: e2126
• 13 Mohan AT, Rammos CK, Akhavan AA. et al. Evolving concepts of keystone perforator island flaps (KPIF): principles of perforator anatomy, design modifications, and extended clinical applications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137: 1909-20
• 14 Behan FC. The keystone design perforator island flap in reconstructive surgery. ANZ J Surg 2003; 73: 112-20
• 15 Shim JH, Hwang NH, Yoon ES. et al. Closure of myelomeningocele defects using a Limberg flap or direct repair. Arch Plast Surg 2016; 43: 26-31
• 16 Gomez O, Barrera C. Keystone flap: a safe coverage option in the handling of salvage for myelomeningocele. Childs Nerv Syst 2020; 36: 2765-74
• 17 Mohan AT, Sur YJ, Zhu L. et al. The concepts of propeller, perforator, keystone, and other local flaps and their role in the evolution of reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138: 710e-729e
• 18 Gutman MJ, Goldschlager T, Fahardieh RD. et al. Keystone design perforator island flap for closure of myelomeningocele. Childs Nerv Syst 2011; 27: 1459-63
• 19 Lees VC. Successful revascularization of subtotal amputation of a digit in a neonate. J Hand Surg Am 1999; 24: 812-5
• 20 Son J, Medalie DA. Free-flap treatment of congenital pressure necrosis of the forearm in the neonate. J Reconstr Microsurg Open 2016; 1: 29-31
• 21 Imaizumi A. Duplex ultrasonography-assisted freestyle pedicled perforator flaps for the repair of myelomeningocele defects. Ann Plast Surg 2018; 80: 539-45
• 22 Formentin C, de Andrade EJ, Matias LG. et al. Using the keystone design perforator island flap in large myelomeningocele closure. Neurosurg Focus 2019; 47: E19
• 23 Lee HG, Lim SY, Kim YK. et al. Keystone design perforator island flaps for coverage of non-oncological periarticular defects surrounded by the zone of injury. J Int Med Res 2020; 48: 1-14
• 24 Woodhouse CR. Myelomeningocele: neglected aspects. Pediatr Nephrol 2008; 23: 1223-31
• 25 Gaskill SJ. Primary closure of open myelomeningocele. Neurosurg Focus 2004; 16: E3