RSS-Feed abonnieren
![](/products/assets/desktop/img/oa-logo.png)
DOI: 10.5999/aps.2020.01410
Thoracodorsal artery flaps for breast reconstruction–the variants and its approach
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00051611/202101/lookinside/thumbnails/10_5999_aps_2020_01410_15-1.jpg)
Thoracodorsal artery (TDA) flaps, ranging from the vascular-pedicled thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP) flap, the propeller TDAP flap, and the muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi (MSLD) flap to the conventional latissimus dorsi (LD) flap and the extended LD flap, can all be used for breast reconstruction. The aim of this paper and review is to share our experiences and recommendations for procedure selection when applying TDA-based flaps for breast reconstruction. We describe the different surgical techniques and our thoughts and experience regarding indications and selection between these procedures for individual patients who opt for breast reconstruction. We have performed 574 TDA flaps in 491 patients: 60 extended LD flaps, 122 conventional LD flaps, two MSLD flaps, 233 propeller TDAP flaps, 122 TDAP flaps, and 35 free contralateral TDAP flaps for stacked TDAP breast reconstruction. All the TDA flaps are important flaps for reconstruction of the breast. The LD flap is still an option, although we prefer flaps without muscle when possible. The vascular-pedicled TDAP flap is an option for experienced surgeons, and the propeller TDAP flap can be used in most reconstructive cases of the breast, although a secondary procedure is often necessary for correction of the pedicle bulk. The extended LD flap is an option for women with a substantial body mass index, although it is associated with the highest morbidity of all the TDA flaps. The MSLD flap can be used if the perforators are small or if dissection of the perforators is assessed to be hazardous.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 21. Juni 2020
Angenommen: 09. September 2020
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
20. März 2022
© 2021. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
REFERENCES
- 1 Tansini I. Sopra il mio nuovo processo di amputazione della mamella. Riforma Medica 1906; 12: 757
- 2 Maxwell GP. Iginio Tansini and the origin of the latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1980; 65: 686-92
- 3 Schneider WJ, Hill Jr HL, Brown RG. Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 1977; 30: 277-81
- 4 Hokin JA. Mastectomy reconstruction without a prosthetic implant. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983; 72: 810-18
- 5 Godina M. The tailored latissimus dorsi free flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987; 80: 304-6
- 6 Hayashi A, Maruyama Y. The “reduced” latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989; 84: 290-5
- 7 Angrigiani C, Grilli D, Siebert J. Latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap without muscle. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 96: 1608-14
- 8 Hamdi M, Van Landuyt K, Monstrey S. et al. Pedicled perforator flaps in breast reconstruction: a new concept. Br J Plast Surg 2004; 57: 531-9
- 9 Hamdi M, Salgarello M, Barone-Adesi L. et al. Use of the thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP) flap with implant in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2008; 61: 143-6
- 10 Gunnarsson GL, Holm J, Duus N. et al. Propeller TAP flap breast reconstruction: a simplified surgical technique. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2018; 71: 1424-31
- 11 Jacobs J, Borsen-Koch M, Gunnarsson GL. et al. The versatile extended thoracodorsal artery perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2016; 77: 396-400
- 12 Borsen-Koch M, Gunnarsson GL, Udesen A. et al. Direct delayed breast reconstruction with TAP flap, implant and acellular dermal matrix (TAPIA). J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68: 815-21
- 13 Thomsen JB, Bille C, Wamberg P. et al. Propeller TAP flap: is it usable for breast reconstruction?. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2013; 47: 379-82
- 14 Nahabedian MY, Momen B, Galdino G. et al. Breast reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: patient selection, choice of flap, and outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110: 466-75
- 15 Rindom MB, Gunnarsson GL, Lautrup MD. et al. Shoulder-related donor site morbidity after delayed breast reconstruction with pedicled flaps from the back: an open label randomized controlled clinical trial. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2019; 72: 1942-09
- 16 Angrigiani C, Rancati A, Escudero E. et al. Extended thoracodorsal artery perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Gland Surg 2015; 04: 519-27
- 17 Rindom MB, Gunnarsson GL, Lautrup MD. et al. Shoulder-related donor site morbidity and patient-reported satisfaction after delayed breast reconstruction with pedicled flaps from the back: a comparative analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2018; 71: 1108-15
- 18 Angrigiani C, Rancati A, Escudero E. et al. Propeller thoracodorsal artery perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Gland Surg 2014; 03: 174-80
- 19 Ayestaray B, Ogawa R, Ono S. et al. Propeller flaps: classification and clinical applications. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2011; 56: 90-08
- 20 Rifaat MA, Amin AA, Bassiouny M. et al. The extended latissimus dorsi flap option in autologous breast reconstruction: a report of 14 cases and review of the literature. Indian J Plast Surg 2008; 41: 24-33
- 21 Chang DW, Youssef A, Cha S. et al. Autologous breast reconstruction with the extended latissimus dorsi flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110: 751-09
- 22 Lohana P, Button J, Young D. et al. Functional recovery after bilateral extended autologous latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction: a prospective observational study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2019; 72: 1060-06
- 23 Angrigiani C, Rancati A, Artero G. et al. TDAP: island versus propeller. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2016; 69: 506-11
- 24 Thomsen JB, Gunnarsson GL. The evolving breast reconstruction: from latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap to a propeller thoracodorsal fasciocutaneous flap. Gland Surg 2014; 03: 151-04
- 25 Gunnarsson GL, Borsen-Koch M, Nielsen HT. et al. Bilateral breast reconstruction with extended thoracodorsal artery perforator propeller flaps and implants. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2015; 03: e435
- 26 Perignon D, Qassemyar Q, Benhaim T. et al. From Tansini to Angrigiani: improvement and refinement of the thoracodorsal flap. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2011; 56: 149-55
- 27 Angrigiani C, Rancati A, Artero G. et al. Stacked thoracodorsal artery perforator flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138: 969e-972e
- 28 Hamdi M. Oncoplastic and reconstructive surgery of the breast. Breast 2013; 22 Suppl 2: S100-5
- 29 Adler N, Seitz IA, Song DH. Pedicled thoracodorsal artery perforator flap in breast reconstruction: clinical experience. Eplasty 2009; 09: e24
- 30 Ortiz CL, Mendoza MM, Sempere LN. et al. Versatility of the pedicled thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP) flap in soft tissue reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2007; 58: 315-20
- 31 Borsen-Koch M, Gunnarsson GL, Sorensen JA. et al. Thermal injury in TAPIA breast reconstruction-thermal injury to thoracodorsal artery perforator flap. Gland Surg 2017; 06: 110-03
- 32 Gunnarsson GL, Tei T, Thomsen JB. Color doppler ultrasonography-targeted perforator mapping and angiosome-based flap reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2016; 77: 464-08
- 33 Lorenzen MM, Gunnarsson GL, Bille C. et al. Visualized bilateral breast reconstruction by propeller thoracodorsal artery perforator flaps. Gland Surg 2019; 8(Suppl 4): S262-70
- 34 Ibrahim RM, Gunnarsson GL, Akram J. et al. Color Doppler ultrasonography targeted reconstruction using pedicled perforator flaps: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Plast Surg 2018; 41: 495-504
- 35 Alstrup T, Christensen BO, Damsgaard TE. ICG angiography in immediate and delayed autologous breast reconstructions: peroperative evaluation and postoperative outcomes. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2018; 52: 307-11
- 36 Abdelrahman EM, Nawar AM, Balbaa MA. et al. Oncoplastic volume replacement for breast cancer: latissimus dorsi flap versus thoracodorsal artery perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019; 07: e2476
- 37 Lutringer J, Flipo B, Carles M. et al. Functional impairment and its impact on sporting activities after latissimus dorsi flap breast reconstruction. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2012; 57: 567-74
- 38 Garusi C, Manconi A, Lanni G. et al. Shoulder function after breast reconstruction with the latissimus dorsi flap: a prospective cohort study. Combining DASH score and objective evaluation. Breast 2016; 27: 78-86
- 39 Blackburn NE, Mc Veigh JG, Mc Caughan E. et al. The musculoskeletal consequences of breast reconstruction using the latissimus dorsi muscle for women following mastectomy for breast cancer: a critical review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2018; 27: e12664
- 40 Smith SL. Functional morbidity following latissimus dorsi flap breast reconstruction. J Adv Pract Oncol 2014; 05: 181-7
- 41 Friedman O, Fliss E, Inbal A. et al. Latissimus dorsi flap: a winning hand for breast reconstruction salvage. Isr Med Assoc J 2019; 21: 260-04
- 42 Umar M, Jahangir N, Hughes M. et al. Incidence of shoulder functional morbidity following ipsilateral mastectomy and latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2019; 53: 448-51
- 43 Browne JP, Jeevan R, Pusic AL. et al. Measuring the patient perspective on latissimus dorsi donor site outcomes following breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2018; 71: 336-43