Clinical application of cryolipolysis in Asian patients for subcutaneous fat reduction and body contouring

Background Cryolipolysis, a preferred method for minimally invasive body contouring, involves the noninvasive cooling of adipocytes to induce lipolysis without damaging other tissues. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cryolipolysis for the treatment of excessive fat tissue.

Methods Between May 2014 and December 2017, 231 patients with 448 areas of interest were enrolled and their records were retrospectively reviewed. We used five different vacuum applicators, and the best-fitting applicator was used for each area. One cycle of cryolipolysis was applied at a cooling intensity factor of 41.6. The efficacy was evaluated 12 weeks after treatment via review of clinical photographs, the pinch test, and ultrasonographic measurements of fat thickness. The occurrence of any complications was also assessed.

Results The volume was reduced in all of the areas to which cryolipolysis was applied. The rate of reduction of the fat layer as measured via the pinch test was 19.2%, and the rate of the decrease in fat layer thickness as measured via ultrasonography was 22.8%. Fat reduction of the upper arm differed significantly from that of the abdomen and flank, but no significant difference was found between sexes. The side effects were limited to erythema, edema, bruising, and numbness at the treatment site and resolved without treatment.

Conclusions Cryolipolysis, with new and better-fitting applicators, is safe, fast, and effective for the reduction of excessive fat tissue on the abdomen, back, flank, and extremities. It is a good option for treating excess adipose tissue in Asian patients.

Keywords

Body contouring - Lipoplasty - Subcutaneous fat

This article was presented as a free paper at the 36th International Meeting of the Korean Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery on April 8, 2018, in Seoul, Korea.

Publication History

Received: 21 September 2019

Accepted: 05 November 2019

Article published online:
25 March 2022

• REFERENCES

• 1 Ahmad J, Eaves 3rd FF, Rohrich RJ. et al. The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ASAPS) survey: current trends in liposuction. Aesthet Surg J 2011; 31: 214-24
• 2 Heymans O, Castus P, Grandjean FX. et al. Liposuction: review of the techniques, innovations and applications. Acta Chir Belg 2006; 106: 647-53
• 3 Desrosiers 3rd AE, Grant RT, Breitbart AS. Don’t try this at home: liposuction in the kitchen by an unqualified practitioner leads to disastrous complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113: 460-1
• 4 Holliday R, Elfving-Hwang J. Gender, globalization and aesthetic surgery in South Korea. Body Soc 2012; 18: 58-81
• 5 Mulholland RS, Paul MD, Chalfoun C. Noninvasive body contouring with radiofrequency, ultrasound, cryolipolysis, and low-level laser therapy. Clin Plast Surg 2011; 38: 503-20
• 6 Katz B, McBean J, Cheung JS. The new laser liposuction for men. Dermatol Ther 2007; 20: 448-51
• 7 Avram MM, Harry RS. Cryolipolysis for subcutaneous fat layer reduction. Lasers Surg Med 2009; 41: 703-8
• 8 Rivers JK, Ulmer M, Vestvik B. et al. A customized approach for arm fat reduction using cryolipolysis. Lasers Surg Med 2018; 50: 732-7
• 9 Zelickson BD, Burns AJ, Kilmer SL. Cryolipolysis for safe and effective inner thigh fat reduction. Lasers Surg Med 2015; 47: 120-7
• 10 Stevens WG, Bachelor EP. Cryolipolysis conformable-surface applicator for nonsurgical fat reduction in lateral thighs. Aesthet Surg J 2015; 35: 66-71
• 11 Suh DH, Park JH, Jung HK. et al. Cryolipolysis for submental fat reduction in Asians. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2018; 20: 24-7
• 12 Munavalli GS, Panchaprateep R. Cryolipolysis for targeted fat reduction and improved appearance of the enlarged male breast. Dermatol Surg 2015; 41: 1043-51
• 13 Caruso-Davis MK, Guillot TS, Podichetty VK. et al. Efficacy of low-level laser therapy for body contouring and spot fat reduction. Obes Surg 2011; 21: 722-9
• 14 Ter Poorten JC, Hebert AA, Ilkiw R. Cold panniculitis in a neonate. J Am Acad Dermatol 1995; 33(2 Pt 2): 383-5
• 15 Zelickson B, Egbert BM, Preciado J. et al. Cryolipolysis for noninvasive fat cell destruction: initial results from a pig model. Dermatol Surg 2009; 35: 1462-70
• 16 Nelson AA, Wasserman D, Avram MM. Cryolipolysis for reduction of excess adipose tissue. Semin Cutan Med Surg 2009; 28: 244-9
• 17 Carruthers J, Stevens WG, Carruthers A. et al. Cryolipolysis and skin tightening. Dermatol Surg 2014; 40 Suppl 12: S184-9
• 18 Putra IB, Jusuf NK, Dewi NK. Utilisation of cryolipolysis among Asians: a review on efficacy and safety. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2019; 7: 1548-54
• 19 Coleman SR, Sachdeva K, Egbert BM. et al. Clinical efficacy of noninvasive cryolipolysis and its effects on peripheral nerves. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2009; 33: 482-8
• 20 Klein KB, Zelickson B, Riopelle JG. et al. Non-invasive cryolipolysis for subcutaneous fat reduction does not affect serum lipid levels or liver function tests. Lasers Surg Med 2009; 41: 785-90
• 21 Shek SY, Chan NP, Chan HH. Non-invasive cryolipolysis for body contouring in Chinese: a first commercial experience. Lasers Surg Med 2012; 44: 125-30
• 22 Meyer PF, Davi Costa E Silva J, Santos de Vasconcellos L. et al. Cryolipolysis: patient selection and special considerations. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 2018; 11: 499-503
• 23 Jalian HR, Avram MM, Garibyan L. et al. Paradoxical adipose hyperplasia after cryolipolysis. JAMA Dermatol 2014; 150: 317-9