Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.5999/aps.2019.00409
Graduate perception of cosmetic surgery training in plastic surgery residency and fellowship programs
Authors
Background As the demand for cosmetic surgery continues to rise, plastic surgery programs and the training core curriculum have evolved to reflect these changes. This study aims to evaluate the perceived quality of current cosmetic surgery training in terms of case exposure and educational methods.
Methods A 16-question survey was sent to graduates who completed their training at a U.S. plastic surgery training program in 2017. The survey assessed graduates’ exposure to cosmetic surgery, teaching modalities employed and their overall perceived competence. Case complexity was characterized by the minimum number of cases needed by the graduate to feel confident in performing the procedure.
Results There was a 25% response rate. The majority of respondents were residents (83%, n=92) and the remaining were fellows (17%, n=18). Almost three quarters of respondents were satisfied with their cosmetic training. Respondents rated virtual training as the most effective learning modality and observing attendings’ patients/cases as least effective. Perceived competence was more closely aligned with core curriculum status than case complexity, i.e. graduates feel more prepared for core cosmetic procedures despite being more technically difficult than non-core procedures.
Conclusions Despite the variability in cosmetic exposure during training, most plastic surgery graduates are satisfied with their aesthetic training. Incorporation of teaching modalities, such as virtual training, can increase case exposure and allow trainees more autonomy. The recommended core curriculum is adequately training plastic surgery graduates for common procedures and more specialized procedures should be consigned to aesthetic fellowship training.
* The two authors contributed equally to this work.
Supplemental Material 1. Study survey.
- Supplementary material (PDF) (opens in new window)
Supplemental data can be found at: https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2019.00409.S001
Publication History
Received: 10 March 2019
Accepted: 23 November 2019
Article published online:
25 March 2022
© 2020. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
REFERENCES
- 1 American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ASAPS). Cosmetic Surgery National Data Bank Statistics [Internet]. Garden Grove, CA: ASAPS; 2017 [cited 2019 Feb 2]. Available from: https://www.surgery.org/sites/default/files/ASAPS-Stats2017.pdf
- 2 Oni G, Ahmad J, Zins JE. et al. Cosmetic surgery training in plastic surgery residency programs in the United States: how have we progressed in the last three years?. Aesthet Surg J 2011; 31: 445-55
- 3 Momeni A, Kim RY, Wan DC. et al. Aesthetic surgery training during residency in the United States: a comparison of the integrated, combined, and independent training models. Plast Surg Int 2014; 2014: 281923
- 4 Momeni A, Goerke SM, Bannasch H. et al. The quality of aesthetic surgery training in plastic surgery residency: a survey among residents in Germany. Ann Plast Surg 2013; 70: 704-8
- 5 Chivers QJ, Ahmad J, Lista F. et al. Cosmetic surgery training in Canadian plastic surgery residencies: are we training competent surgeons?. Aesthet Surg J 2013; 33: 160-5
- 6 Morrison CM, Rotemberg SC, Moreira-Gonzalez A. et al. A survey of cosmetic surgery training in plastic surgery programs in the United States. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122: 1570-8
- 7 Zheng J, Zhang B, Yin Y. et al. Comparison of plastic surgery residency training in United States and China. Ann Plast Surg 2015; 75: 672-8
- 8 Smith J, Kilshaw A, Williams A. UKTEAS: United Kingdom training experience in aesthetic surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2016; 69: 1008-9
- 9 McNichols CHL, Diaconu S, Alfadil S. et al. Cosmetic surgery training in plastic surgery residency programs. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2017; 5: e1491
- 10 Hashem AM, Waltzman JT, D’Souza GF. et al. Resident and program director perceptions of aesthetic training in plastic surgery residency: an update. Aesthet Surg J 2017; 37: 837-46
- 11 Kraft CT, Harake MS, Janis JE. Longitudinal assessment of aesthetic plastic surgery training in the United States: the effect of increased ACGME case log minimum requirements. Aesthet Surg J 2019; 39: NP76-82
- 12 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (AGGME). Operative minimums effective July 1, 2014 review committee for plastic surgery [Internet]. Chicago, IL: AGGME; 2017 [cited 2019 Feb 2]. Available from: https://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramResources/Operative_Minimums_effective_07012014.pdf
- 13 Karch MA. Potential oral exam candidates [Internet]. The American Board of Plastic Surgery. Philadelphia, PA: 2017. [cited 2018 Oct 30]. Available from: https://www.abplasticsurgery.org/media/11090/2017-abps-annual-newsletter.pdf
- 14 American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS). 2016 Cosmetic plastic surgery statistics cosmetic procedure trends [Internet]. Arlington Heights, IL: ASPS; 2017 [cited 2019 Mar 7]. Available from: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/News/Statistics/2016/cosmetic-procedure-trends-2016.pdf
- 15 Aly A, Avila E, Cram AE. Endoscopic plastic surgery. Surg Clin North Am 2000; 80: 1373-82
- 16 Klingensmith ME, Awad M, Delman KA. et al. Early results from the flexibility in surgical training research consortium: resident and program director attitudes toward flexible rotations in senior residency. J Surg Educ 2015; 72: e151-7
- 17 Rosen JM, Long SA, McGrath DM. et al. Simulation in plastic surgery training and education: the path forward. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123: 729-38
- 18 Jang HW, Kim KJ. Use of online clinical videos for clinical skills training for medical students: benefits and challenges. BMC Med Educ 2014; 14: 56
- 19 Fearing N, Bachman S, Holzman M. et al. Evaluation of a video-based curriculum for laparoscopic biliary surgery: a pilot study from the SAGES MIS Web Learning Center. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 3141-3
- 20 Wojcik BM, Fong ZV, Patel MS. et al. Structured operative autonomy: an institutional approach to enhancing surgical resident education without impacting patient outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 2017; 225: 713-24
- 21 Teman NR, Gauger PG, Mullan PB. et al. Entrustment of general surgery residents in the operating room: factors contributing to provision of resident autonomy. J Am Coll Surg 2014; 219: 778-87
- 22 American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS). 2017 Cosmetic plastic surgery statistics cosmetic procedure trends [Internet]. Arlington Heights, IL: ASPS; 2018 [cited 2019 Mar 7]. Available from: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/News/Statistics/2017/plastic-surgery-statistics-full-report-2017.pdf
- 23 Richards MK, McAteer JP, Drake FT. et al. A national review of the frequency of minimally invasive surgery among general surgery residents: assessment of ACGME case logs during 2 decades of general surgery resident training. JAMA Surg 2015; 150: 169-72
- 24 Schauer PR, Page CP, Stewart RM. et al. The effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on resident training. Am J Surg 1994; 168: 566-9
- 25 Heine SJ, Lehman DR, Peng K. et al. What’s wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales?: The reference-group effect. J Pers Soc Psychol 2002; 82: 903-18