CC BY-NC 4.0 · Arch Plast Surg 2020; 47(04): 360-364
DOI: 10.5999/aps.2019.00325
Case Report

A rare case of implant displacement to the contralateral side after gluteal augmentation

Department of Plastic Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Santander, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia
,
Health Faculty, Universidad Santiago de Cali, Cali, Colombia
,
Department of Plastic Surgery, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia
,
Department of Plastic Surgery, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia
› Institutsangaben

In this report, we present a rare case of solid silicone implant displacement to the contralateral side after aesthetic gluteal augmentation, a phenomenon that has never been reported before in the literature. A 29-year-old woman with a history of gluteal augmentation 9 months previously and soft tissue infection presented for a consultation due to 3 days of sudden progressive pain in the right gluteus with erythema and edema, without a history of trauma. Displacement of the left gluteal implant to the right gluteal pocket was shown by magnetic resonance imaging. Because the patient refused implant removal, the decision was made to perform capsulotomy, to reconstruct the gluteal pockets, and to preserve the implants. The patient showed a satisfactory early and late postoperative course. Possible causes of this complication include poor surgical technique, with insufficient tissue preservation to keep the pockets apart, and the presence of seroma or hematoma that favored an infectious process, thereby leading to deterioration of the dissected soft tissues with dehiscence of the wound favoring the displacement of the implant.



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 28. Februar 2019

Angenommen: 18. Oktober 2019

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
25. März 2022

© 2020. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Bruner TW, Roberts 3rd TL, Nguyen K. Complications of buttocks augmentation: diagnosis, management, and prevention. Clin Plast Surg 2006; 33: 449-66
  • 2 Mofid MM, Gonzalez R, de la Pena JA. et al. Buttock augmentation with silicone implants: a multicenter survey review of 2226 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131: 897901
  • 3 Flores-Lima G, Eppley BL, Dimas JR. et al. Surgical pocket location for gluteal implants: a systematic review. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2013; 37: 240-5
  • 4 Senderoff DM. Buttock augmentation with solid silicone implants. Aesthet Surg J 2011; 31: 320-7
  • 5 Sinno S, Chang JB, Brownstone ND. et al. Determining the safety and efficacy of gluteal augmentation: a systematic review of outcomes and complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137: 1151-6
  • 6 Serra F, Aboudib JH, Neto JI. et al. Volumetric and functional evaluation of the gluteus maximus muscle after augmentation gluteoplasty using silicone implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135: 533e-541e
  • 7 Serra F, Aboudib JH. Gluteal implant displacement: diagnosis and treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 134: 647-54
  • 8 Mezzine H, Khairallah G, Abs R. et al. Buttocks enhancement using silicone implants: a national practices assessement about 538 patients. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2015; 60: 110-6
  • 9 Senderoff DM. Aesthetic surgery of the buttocks using implants: practice-based recommendations. Aesthet Surg J 2016; 36: 559-76