Download PDF
CC BY-NC 4.0 · Arch Plast Surg 2017; 44(02): 166-169
DOI: 10.5999/aps.2017.44.2.166
Idea and Innovation

A New Technique for Conchal Cartilage Harvest

Joon Young Kim
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Eulji University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
,
Ho Jik Yang
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Eulji University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
,
Ji Won Jeong
Doctorsmi Aesthetic Plastic Surgical Clinic, Daejeon, Korea
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

The goal of auricular cartilage harvest is to obtain a sufficient amount for reconstruction and to minimize the change in ear shape. The cartilage can be harvested by a posterior or anterior approach, and each method has advantages and disadvantages. The posterior approach presents the advantage of scar concealment, but there are limits to the amount of cymba cartilage that may be harvested. In contrast, the anterior approach may cause a noticeable scar. However, as cartilage is collected, the anterior approach provides a view that facilitates the preservation ear structure. In addition, it is possible to obtain a greater amount of cartilage. From January 2014 to December 2015, we harvested auricular cartilage graft material in 17 patients. To prevent the development of trapdoor scars or linear scar contracture, short incisions were made on the superior border of the cymba and cavum. Two small and narrow incisions were made, resulting in suboptimal exposure of the surgical site, which heightens the potential for damaging the cartilage when using existing tools. To minimize this, the authors used a newly invented ball-type elevator. All patients recovered without complications after surgery and reported satisfaction with the shape of the ear.

Keywords

Ear cartilage - Tissue and organ harvesting - Autograft


Publication History

Received: 18 June 2016

Accepted: 19 December 2016

Article published online:
20 April 2022

© 2017. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Endo T, Nakayama Y, Ito Y. Augmentation rhinoplasty: observations on 1200 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991; 87: 54-59
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Lee M, Callahan S, Cochran CS. Auricular cartilage: harvest technique and versatility in rhinoplasty. Am J Otolaryngol 2011; 32: 547-552
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Cochran CS, DeFatta RJ. Tragal cartilage grafts in rhinoplasty: a viable alternative in the graft-depleted patient. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008; 138: 166-169
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Boccieri A, Marano A. The conchal cartilage graft in nasal reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2007; 60: 188-194
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Grobbelaar AO, Matti BA, Nicolle FV. Donor site morbidity post-conchal cartilage grafting. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1997; 21: 90-92
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Steiger JD, Bloom J, Becker DG. Auricular cartilage grafts. Oper Tech Otolayngol Head Neck Surg 2008; 19: 267-272
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Adams Jr WP, Rohrich RJ, Gunter JP. et al. The rate of warping in irradiated and nonirradiated homograft rib cartilage: a controlled comparison and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 103: 265-270
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Romo 3rd T, Kwak ES, Sclafani AP. Revision rhinoplasty using porous high-density polyethylene implants to reestablish ethnic identity. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2006; 30: 679-684
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Gunter JP, Landecker A, Cochran CS. Frequently used grafts in rhinoplasty: nomenclature and analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118: 14e-29e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Sajjadian A, Rubinstein R, Naghshineh N. Current status of grafts and implants in rhinoplasty: part I. Autologous grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125: 40e-49e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Moshaver A, Gantous A. The use of autogenous costal cartilage graft in septorhinoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007; 137: 862-867
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Thomson HG, Kim TY, Ein SH. Residual problems in chest donor sites after microtia reconstruction: a long-term study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 95: 961-968
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Han K, Kim J, Son D. et al. How to harvest the maximal amount of conchal cartilage grafts. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008; 61: 1465-1471
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Rohrich RJ, Ahmad J. Plastic surgery. In: Neligan P. Plastic surgery. London: Elsevier Saunders; 2013: 395-396
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Erol OO. New modification in otoplasty: anterior approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 107: 193-202
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar