Transaxillary Subpectoral Placement of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices in Young Female Patients

Background The current indications of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) have expanded to include young patients with serious cardiac risk factors, but CIED placement has the disadvantage of involving unsightly scarring and bulging of the chest wall. A collaborative team of cardiologists and plastic surgeons developed a technique for the subpectoral placement of CIEDs in young female patients via a transaxillary approach.

Methods From July 2012 to December 2015, subpectoral CIED placement via an axillary incision was performed in 10 young female patients, with a mean age of 25.9 years and mean body mass index of 20.1 kg/m2. In the supine position, with the patient's shoulder abducted, an approximately 5-cm linear incision was made along one of the deepest axillary creases. The submuscular plane was identified at the lateral border of the pectoralis major, and the dissection continued over the clavipectoral fascia until the subpectoral pocket could securely receive a pulse generator. Slight upward dissection also exposed an entrance to the subclavian vein, allowing the cardiology team to gain access to the vein. One patient with dilated cardiomyopathy underwent augmentation mammoplasty and CIED insertion simultaneously.

Results One case of late-onset device infection occurred. All patients were highly satisfied with the results and reported that they would recommend the procedure to others.

Conclusions With superior aesthetic outcomes compared to conventional methods, the subpectoral placement of CIEDs via a transaxillary approach is an effective, single-incision method to hide operative scarring and minimize bulging of the device, and is particularly beneficial for young female or lean patients.

Keywords

Defibrillators, implantable - Pacemaker, artificial - Cardiac resynchronization therapy

This study was presented at the Sixth Research and Reconstructive Forum of the Korean Society of Plastic Surgeons on April 7th, 2016 in Daegu, Korea.

Publication History

Received: 22 April 2016

Accepted: 19 October 2016

Article published online:
20 April 2022

• REFERENCES

• 1 Connolly SJ, Hallstrom AP, Cappato R. et al. Meta-analysis of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator secondary prevention trials: AVID, CASH and CIDS studies. Antiarrhythmics vs Implantable Defibrillator study. Cardiac Arrest Study Hamburg Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study. Eur Heart J 2000; 21: 2071-2078
• 2 Goldberger Z, Lampert R. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: expanding indications and technologies. JAMA 2006; 295: 809-818
• 3 Hammill SC, Kremers MS, Stevenson LW. et al. Review of the registry’s fourth year, incorporating lead data and pediatric ICD procedures, and use as a national performance measure. Heart Rhythm 2010; 7: 1340-1345
• 4 Vazquez LD, Kuhl EA, Shea JB. et al. Age-specific differences in women with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: an international multi center study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2008; 31: 1528-1534
• 5 A comparison of antiarrhythmic-drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from near-fatal ventricular arrhythmias: the Antiarrhythmics versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Investigators. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 1576-1583
• 6 Sears Jr SF, Todaro JF, Lewis TS. et al. Examining the psychosocial impact of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a literature review. Clin Cardiol 1999; 22: 481-489
• 7 Thomas SA, Friedmann E, Kao CW. et al. Quality of life and psychological status of patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Am J Crit Care 2006; 15: 389-398
• 8 Marshall P, Ketchell A, Maclean J. Comparison of male and female psychological outcomes related to implantable cardioverter defibrillators (COMFORTID). Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2012; 11: 313-321
• 9 Belott PH, Bucko D. Inframammary pulse generator placement for maximizing cosmetic effect. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1983; 6: 1241-1244
• 10 Allan D. Augmentation mammaplasty approach to pacemaker implantation. Ann Plast Surg 1985; 15: 242-243
• 11 Kolettis TM, Saxena A, Krol RB. et al. Submammary implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator with nonthoracotomy lead system. Am Heart J 1993; 126: 1222-1223
• 12 Ozin B, Borman H, Bozbas H. et al. Implantation of submammary implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2004; 27: 779-782
• 13 Schaverien MV, Elder D, Munnoch DA. Inframammary cardiac pacemaker insertion in women: an aesthetic alternative. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131: 464e-465e
• 14 Giudici MC. Experience with a cosmetic approach to device implantation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2001; 24: 1679-1680
• 15 Giudici MC, Carlson JI, Krupa RK. et al. Submammary pacemakers and ICDs in women: long-term follow-up and patient satisfaction. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2010; 33: 1373-1375
• 16 Persichetti P, Brunetti B, Cagli B. et al. Aesthetic subpectoral placement of implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Ann Plast Surg 2014; 72: 188-192
• 17 Hammel D, Block M, Borggrefe M. et al. Implantation of a cardioverter/defibrillator in the subpectoral region combined with a nonthoracotomy lead system. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1992; 15: 367-368
• 18 Asamura S, Kurita T, Motoki K. et al. Efficacy and feasibility of the submuscular implantation technique for an implantable cardiac electrical device. Eplasty 2014; 14: e40
• 19 Molina JE. New technique for pacemaker implantation in the upper chest of children and women. Ann Thorac Surg 1991; 51: 992-995
• 20 Shefer A, Lewis BS, Gang ES. The retropectoral transaxillary permanent pacemaker: description of a technique for percutaneous implantation of an “invisible” device. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1996; 19: 1646-1651
• 21 Rosenthal E. A cosmetic approach for pectoral pacemaker implantation in young girls. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2000; 23: 1397-1400