Subscribe to RSS
![](/products/assets/desktop/img/oa-logo.png)
DOI: 10.5999/aps.2017.01760
Analysis of gluteal subcutaneous and muscle thickness in infants and children for application to intramuscular injection, autologous fat grafting, and gluteal artery perforator flaps
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00051611/201806/lookinside/thumbnails/10_5999_aps_2017_01760_550-1.jpg)
Background To achieve improvements in intramuscular injection, autologous fat grafting, and gluteal artery perforator flaps in infants and children, the relationships of computed tomography (CT)-determined gluteal muscle thickness (MT) and subcutaneous tissue thickness (SCT) with age and body mass index (BMI) were analyzed.
Methods Gluteal SCT and MT at ventrogluteal (VG) and dorsogluteal (DG) sites were measured in a standardized manner in 350 patients aged 0 to 6 years who had visited a tertiary hospital and had undergone abdominopelvic CT between January 2005 and December 2016. Recorded measurements were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and stepwise multiple regression to identify the factors that were most closely related to MT and SCT.
Results Subcutaneous tissue at VG sites was thinner than at DG sites, but not significantly so in any age group. Muscles tended to be thinner at VG sites in 4 to 7-year-old, but thicker at VG sites in 1 to 3-year-old, though the differences were not significant. MT in the VG and DG regions was found to be related to age, and SCT in these regions to be related to age and BMI.
Conclusions The VG and DG sites should be considered as alternatives for intramuscular injection in infants and children when the anterolateral site is problematic. In addition, considering the gluteal MT and SCT of infants and children should help produce good results in autologous fat grafting and gluteal artery perforator flap harvesting.
Publication History
Received: 11 December 2017
Accepted: 12 September 2018
Article published online:
03 April 2022
© 2018. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
REFERENCES
- 1 Chan VO, Colville J, Persaud T. et al. Intramuscular injections into the buttocks: are they truly intramuscular?. Eur J Radiol 2006; 58: 480-4
- 2 Zaybak A, Gunes UY, Tamsel S. et al. Does obesity prevent the needle from reaching muscle in intramuscular injections?. J Adv Nurs 2007; 58: 552-6
- 3 Haramati N, Lorans R, Lutwin M. et al. Injection granulomas: intramuscle or intrafat?. Arch Fam Med 1994; 3: 146-8
- 4 Poland GA, Borrud A, Jacobson RM. et al. Determination of deltoid fat pad thickness: implications for needle length in adult immunization. JAMA 1997; 277: 1709-11
- 5 Workman B. Safe injection techniques. Nurs Stand 1999; 13: 47-53
- 6 Craven RF, Hirnle CJ. Fundamentals of nursing: human health and function. 2nd ed. New York: Lippincott; 1996
- 7 Kozier B, Erb G, Blais K. 4th ed. Redwood City: Addison-Wesley; 1993
- 8 Rosdahl CB. Textbook of basic nursing. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1995
- 9 Hochsetter VA. Uber die intraglutaale injektion, ihre komplicationen und deren verhutung. Shweizerische Medizinische Wochenschrift 1954; 84: 1226-7
- 10 Zelman S. Notes on techniques of intramuscular injection: the avoidance of needless pain and morbidity. Am J Med Sci 1961; 241: 563-74
- 11 Joo G, Sohng KY. Gluteal subcutaneous fat thickness measured by computed tomography as an estimate of proper gluteal intramuscular injections in Korean adults. J Korean Acad Nurs 2010; 40: 247-54
- 12 Burbridge BE. Computed tomographic measurement of gluteal subcutaneous fat thickness in reference to failure of gluteal intramuscular injections. Can Assoc Radiol J 2007; 58: 72-5
- 13 Yapucu Gunes U, Ceylan B, Bayındır P. Is the ventrogluteal site suitable for intramuscular injections in children under the age of three?. J Adv Nurs 2016; 72: 127-34
- 14 Kim DY, Choi HN, Park JH. et al. Regional analysis of soft tissue thickness on Korean buttocks and application to fasciocutaneous flap design. Arch Plast Surg 2014; 41: 133-9
- 15 Bishop A, Hong P, Bezuhly M. Autologous fat grafting for the treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency: state of the art. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014; 67: 1-8
- 16 Guibert M, Franchi G, Ansari E. et al. Fat graft transfer in children’s facial malformations: a prospective three-dimensional evaluation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013; 66: 799-804
- 17 Schechter NL, Zempsky WT, Cohen LL. et al. Pain reduction during pediatric immunizations: evidence-based review and recommendations. Pediatrics 2007; 119: e1184-98
- 18 Lippert WC, Wall EJ. Optimal intramuscular needle-penetration depth. Pediatrics 2008; 122: e556-63
- 19 Rishovd A. Pediatric intramuscular injections: guidelines for best practice. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 2014; 39: 107-12
- 20 Hughes WT. Complication resulting from an intramuscular injection. J Pediatr 1967; 70: 1011-3
- 21 Cook IF, Murtagh J. Ventrogluteal area: a suitable site for intramuscular vaccination of infants and toddlers. Vaccine 2006; 24: 2403-8
- 22 Wells JC. A Hattori chart analysis of body mass index in infants and children. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000; 24: 325-9
- 23 Rodger MA, King L. Drawing up and administering intramuscular injections: a review of the literature. J Adv Nurs 2000; 31: 574-82
- 24 Gunes UY, Zaybak A, Tamsel S. The examination of the reliability of the method used in identifying of ventrogluteal site. J Cumhur Univ Sch Nurs 2008; 12: 1-8
- 25 Lo Presti D, Ingegnosi C, Strauss K. Skin and subcutaneous thickness at injecting sites in children with diabetes: ultrasound findings and recommendations for giving injection. Pediatr Diabetes 2012; 13: 525-33