CC BY-NC 4.0 · Arch Plast Surg 2018; 45(04): 351-356
DOI: 10.5999/aps.2017.01431
Original Article

Extension block and direct pinning methods for mallet fracture: A comparative study

Department of Plastic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, Ulsan University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
,
Hyun Jun Cho
Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
,
Seong Yeon Kim
Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
,
Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
› Author Affiliations

Background Mallet fracture can easily occur during sports activities or in daily life; however, the principles and methods of treatment for such fractures remain debated. Among the surgical treatments, various methods of closed reduction have been proposed. We treated patients with the extension block method (EBM) and the direct pinning method (DPM), and then compared the results. We assessed differences in range of motion and measurements of finger movement after surgery.

Methods A total of 41 patients who underwent surgery from August 2013 to September 2015 were evaluated retrospectively. Among them, 21 patients were treated with the EBM and 20 patients were treated with the DPM. We then compared extensor lag, range of motion, and outcomes according to Crawford’s criteria between before surgery and at 6 to 8 months postoperatively.

Results The postoperative extensor lag improvement was 4.28° and 10.73°, and the postoperative arc of motion was 55.76° and 61.17° in the EBM and DPM groups, respectively. The Crawford assessment showed no statistically significant difference between the groups, although the score in the DPM group was higher than that in the EBM group (3.5 vs. 3.1).

Conclusions As closed reduction methods for the treatment of mallet fracture, both the EBM and DPM showed good results. However, the DPM proved to be superior to the EBM in that it produced greater improvements in extensor lag and range of motion.



Publication History

Received: 01 September 2017

Accepted: 05 April 2018

Article published online:
03 April 2022

© 2018. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Bloom JM, Khouri JS, Hammert WC. Current concepts in the evaluation and treatment of mallet finger injury. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132: 560e-566e
  • 2 McCue 3rd FC, Meister K. Common sports hand injuries: an overview of aetiology, management and prevention. Sports Med 1993; 15: 281-9
  • 3 Wehbe MA, Schneider LH. Mallet fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984; 66: 658-69
  • 4 Warren RA, Kay NR, Ferguson DG. Mallet finger: comparison between operative and conservative management in those cases failing to be cured by splintage. J Hand Surg Br 1988; 13: 159-60
  • 5 Richards SD, Kumar G, Booth S. et al. A model for the conservative management of mallet finger. J Hand Surg Br 2004; 29: 61-3
  • 6 Fritz D, Lutz M, Arora R. et al. Delayed single Kirschner wire compression technique for mallet fracture. J Hand Surg Br 2005; 30: 180-4
  • 7 Bischoff R, Buechler U, De Roche R. et al. Clinical results of tension band fixation of avulsion fractures of the hand. J Hand Surg Am 1994; 19: 1019-26
  • 8 Zhang X, Meng H, Shao X. et al. Pull-out wire fixation for acute mallet finger fractures with k-wire stabilization of the distal interphalangeal joint. J Hand Surg Am 2010; 35: 1864-9
  • 9 Bauze A, Bain GI. Internal suture for mallet finger fracture. J Hand Surg Br 1999; 24: 688-92
  • 10 Tung KY, Tsai MF, Chang SH. et al. Modified tenodesis method for treatment of mallet fractures. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 69: 622-6
  • 11 Ishiguro T, Itoh Y, Yabe Y. et al. Extension block with Kirschner wire for fracture dislocation of the distal interphalangeal joint. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 1997; 1: 95-102
  • 12 Pegoli L, Toh S, Arai K. et al. The Ishiguro extension block technique for the treatment of mallet finger fracture: indications and clinical results. J Hand Surg Br 2003; 28: 15-7
  • 13 Badia A, Riano F. A simple fixation method for unstable bony mallet finger. J Hand Surg Am 2004; 29: 1051-5
  • 14 Yamanaka K, Sasaki T. Treatment of mallet fractures using compression fixation pins. J Hand Surg Br 1999; 24: 358-60
  • 15 Rha EY, Lee MC, Lee JH. et al. Treatment of mallet fracture using a percutaneous fixation technique with an 18-gauge needle. Acta Orthop Belg 2015; 81: 296-302
  • 16 Crawford GP. The molded polythene splint for mallet finger deformities. J Hand Surg Am 1984; 9: 231-7
  • 17 Bendre AA, Hartigan BJ, Kalainov DM. Mallet finger. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2005; 13: 336-44
  • 18 Pike J, Mulpuri K, Metzger M. et al. Blinded, prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing volar, dorsal, and custom thermoplastic splinting in treatment of acute mallet finger. J Hand Surg Am 2010; 35: 580-8
  • 19 Tocco S, Boccolari P, Landi A. et al. Effectiveness of cast immobilization in comparison to the gold-standard self-removal orthotic intervention for closed mallet fingers: a randomized clinical trial. J Hand Ther 2013; 26: 191-200
  • 20 Salazar Botero S, Hidalgo Diaz JJ, Benaida A. et al. Review of acute trau matic closed mallet finger injuries in adults. Arch Plast Surg 2016; 43: 134-44
  • 21 Alla SR, Deal ND, Dempsey IJ. Current concepts: mallet finger. Hand (N Y) 2014; 9: 138-44