Subscribe to RSS
![](/products/assets/desktop/img/oa-logo.png)
DOI: 10.5999/aps.2017.01018
Multiple venous anastomoses decrease the need for intensive postoperative management in tamai zone I replantations
This article was presented at PRS Korea 2016 on November 17, 2016, in Seoul, Korea.![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00051611/201801/lookinside/thumbnails/10_5999_aps_2017_01018_58-1.jpg)
Background Venous anastomosis is an important component of digital replantation, but is not always feasible, as some cases require external bleeding to treat venous congestion in the replanted tissue. In the present study, we evaluated the relationship between the number of vein anastomoses and the survival rate of Tamai zone I replantations.
Methods A retrospective review was performed of all patients who underwent replantation of a fingertip amputation between 2014 and 2016. Patient charts were reviewed for demographic information, the mechanism of injury, the number of venous anastomoses, and the use of anticoagulation, external bleeding, and/or leeches. The cohort was divided into 3 groups depending on the number of venous anastomoses: no veins (group 1), a single vein (group 2), and 2 or more veins (group 3). Survival rates and external bleeding rates were analyzed across the groups.
Results The review identified 143 fingertip replantations among 134 patients. The overall survival rate was 94% (135 of 143). Failures were due equally to venous complications (n=4, 50%) and to arterial complications (n=4, 50%). Our analysis did not identify any correlation between the number of veins anastomosed and the replant survival rate (P=0.689). However, a greater number of anastomoses was associated with a significantly lower frequency of external bleeding (P=0.017).
Conclusions The number of venous anastomoses was not correlated with the survival rate. However, a greater number of venous anastomoses was associated with a decreased need for external bleeding, corresponding to a significant decrease in the need for postoperative monitoring and leech therapy.
The authors deeply appreciate Dr. Aram Harijan for his insight and assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.
Publication History
Received: 13 June 2017
Accepted: 20 October 2017
Article published online:
03 April 2022
© 2018. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
REFERENCES
- 1 Panattoni JB, De Ona IR, Ahmed MM. Reconstruction of fingertip injuries: surgical tips and avoiding complications. J Hand Surg Am 2015; 40: 1016-24
- 2 Foucher G, Henderson HR, Maneau M. et al. Distal digital replantation: one of the best indications for microsurgery. Int J Microsurg 1981; 3: 263-70
- 3 Rusch MD, Grunert BK, Sanger JR. et al. Psychological adjustment in children after traumatic disfiguring injuries: a 12-month follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106: 1451-8
- 4 Matsuzaki H, Yoshizu T, Maki Y. et al. Functional and cosmetic results of fingertip replantation: anastomosing only the digital artery. Ann Plast Surg 2004; 53: 353-9
- 5 Buntic RF, Brooks D. Standardized protocol for artery-only fingertip replantation. J Hand Surg Am 2010; 35: 1491-6
- 6 Erken HY, Takka S, Akmaz I. Artery-only fingertip replantations using a controlled nailbed bleeding protocol. J Hand Surg Am 2013; 38: 2173-9
- 7 Chen KK, Hsieh TY, Chang KP. Tamai zone I fingertip replantation: is external bleeding obligatory for survival of artery anastomosis-only replanted digits?. Microsurgery 2014; 34: 535-9
- 8 Huang HF, Yeong EK. Surgical treatment of distal digit amputation: success in distal digit replantation is not dependent on venous anastomosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135: 174-8
- 9 Efanov JI, Rizis D, Landes G. et al. Impact of the number of veins repaired in short-term digital replantation survival rate. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2016; 69: 640-5
- 10 Aksoy A, Gungor M, Sir E. Fingertip replantation without and with palmar venous anastomosis: analysis of the survival rates and vein distribution. Ann Plast Surg 2017; 78: 62-6
- 11 Matsuda M, Chikamatsu E, Shimizu Y. Correlation between number of anastomosed vessels and survival rate in finger replantation. J Reconstr Microsurg 1993; 9: 1-4
- 12 Kim JS, Yang JW, Lee DC. et al. Challenges in fingertip replantation. Semin Plast Surg 2013; 27: 165-73
- 13 Cheng L, Chen K, Chai YM. et al. Fingertip replantation at the eponychial level with venous anastomosis: an anatomic study and clinical application. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2013; 38: 959-63