Download PDF
CC BY-NC 4.0 · Arch Plast Surg 2016; 43(04): 339-343
DOI: 10.5999/aps.2016.43.4.339
Original Article

A Revision Restoring Projection after Nipple Reconstruction by Burying Four Triangular Dermal Flaps

Ji Hun Kim
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hanyang University Seoul Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
,
Hee Chang Ahn
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hanyang University Seoul Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Background Numerous techniques have been used to achieve long-term projection of the nipple following nipple-areola reconstruction. However, the reconstructed nipple loses projection over time. We describe a technique that uses local flaps to improve the lost projection of reconstructed nipples.

Methods Between November 2013 and March 2015, nine patients (11 nipples) underwent revisional nipple reconstruction for lost projection. Only C–H nipple reconstructions were included in this study. The medical history of each patient was reviewed and photographs were taken in front and lateral views. All patients attended routine follow-up visits. Deepithelialized triangular flaps were made on all four sides of the nipple and buried in the opposite corners in order to augment the volume of the nipple. Anchoring sutures were used to attach each triangular flap on the side opposite their point of origin, and the resulting defects were closed directly.

Results This procedure was used successfully in nine patients (11 nipples). Adequate projection was achieved in all patients and no complications occurred. The average nipple height was 3 mm before operation, 7 mm one day after operation, 5 mm at the six-month follow-up, and 5 mm at the 12-month follow-up. The average nipple-areolar angle was 164° before the operation, 111° one day after the operation, 130° at the six-month follow-up, and 133° at the 12-month follow-up.

Conclusions The method described provides a solution to the loss of projection in reconstructed nipples. We recommend this technique because it leads to better projection, greater volume, and a more natural shape.

Keywords

Nipples - Mammoplasty - Surgical flaps


Publication History

Received: 28 October 2015

Accepted: 12 April 2016

Article published online:
20 April 2022

© 2016. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Little JW. Nipple-areolar reconstruction. In: Cohen M. Mastery of plastic and reconstructive surgery. Boston: Little, Brown; 1994: 1342-1348
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Bhatty MA, Berry RB. Nipple-areola reconstruction by tattooing and nipple sharing. Br J Plast Surg 1997; 50: 331-334
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Kroll SS. Integrated breast mound reduction and nipple reconstruction with the wraparound flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104: 687-693
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Thomas SV, Gellis MB, Pool R. Nipple reconstruction with a new local tissue flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 97: 1053-1056
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ramakrishnan VV, Mohan D, Villafane O. et al. Twin flap technique for nipple reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 1997; 39: 241-244
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Jabor MA, Shayani P, Collins Jr DR. et al. Nipple-areola reconstruction: satisfaction and clinical determinants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110: 457-463
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bernard RW, Beran SJ. Autologous fat graft in nipple reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 112: 964-968
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Tanabe HY, Tai Y, Kiyokawa K. et al. Nipple-areola reconstruction with a dermal-fat flap and rolled auricular cartilage. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 100: 431-438
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Kim DY, Jeong EC, Eo SR. et al. Correction of inverted nipple: an alternative method using two triangular areolar dermal flaps. Ann Plast Surg 2003; 51: 636-640
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Wu HL, Huang X, Zheng SS. A new procedure for correction of severe inverted nipple with two triangular areolar dermofibrous flaps. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2008; 32: 641-644
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Chia HL, Wong M, Tan BK. Nipple reconstruction with rolled dermal graft support. Arch Plast Surg 2014; 41: 158-162
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Nahabedian MY. Secondary nipple reconstruction using local flaps and AlloDerm. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115: 2056-2061
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Shestak KC, Gabriel A, Landecker A. et al. Assessment of long-term nipple projection: a comparison of three techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110: 780-786
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Peled IJ. Purse-string suture for nipple projection. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 103: 1480-1482
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Burm JS, Kim YW. Correction of inverted nipples by strong suspension with areola-based dermal flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120: 1483-1486
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Yamada N, Kakibuchi M, Kitayoshi H. et al. A method for correcting an inverted nipple with an artificial dermis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2004; 28: 233-238
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Park IY, Kim MR, Jo HH. et al. Association of the nipple-areola complexes with age, parity, and breastfeeding in Korean premenopausal women. J Hum Lact 2014; 30: 474-479
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Few JW, Marcus JR, Casas LA. et al. Long-term predictable nipple projection following reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104: 1321-1324
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar