Comparison Study of the Use of Absorbable and Nonabsorbable Materials as Internal Splints after Closed Reduction for Nasal Bone Fracture

Background The authors sought to compare the use of the nonabsorbable polyvinyl alcohol sponge (PVA, Merocel) and absorbable synthetic polyurethane foam (SPF, Nasopore Forte plus) as intranasal splints after closed reduction of fractured nasal bones during the hospitalization period.

Methods The medical records of 111 patients who underwent closed reduction for nasal bone fracture at Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, from 2012 to 2013 were reviewed retrospectively. PVA (group A) or SPF (group B) was packed as an internal splint after closed reduction. The efficacy of the materials was compared and statistically analyzed.

Results PVA was used in 82 patients, and SPF was used in 29 patients. The patients in group B complained significantly more of nasal pain on the first day after operation than the patients in group A. Headaches on the operation day were significantly more painful in group B than in group A. Bleeding on the fourth postoperative day was significantly reduced in group B as compared to group A. The patients in group B exhibited significantly more intensive nasal obstruction on the operation day and the following day than the patients in group A. However, on the third and fourth postoperative days, the nasal obstruction in group B was less than that in group A. The pain and bleeding related to the packing material was significantly reduced in group B as compared to group A.

Conclusions The use of SPF as an absorbable packing material is a reasonable substitute for the traditional nonabsorbable material.

Keywords

Nasal bone - Splints - Facial bones

Publication History

Received: 13 February 2014

Accepted: 18 March 2014

Article published online:
05 May 2022

• References

• 1 Moon SH, Baek SO, Jung SN. et al. Efficacy of biodegradable synthetic polyurethane foam for packing nasal bone fractures. J Craniofac Surg 2012; 23: 1848-1850
• 2 Mondin V, Rinaldo A, Ferlito A. Management of nasal bone fractures. Am J Otolaryngol 2005; 26: 181-185
• 3 Jin KH, Choi JS, Kim YH. et al. Use of triamcinolone-impregnated nasal packing following endoscopic sinus surgery. J Rhinol 2012; 19: 119-122
• 4 Ahn SM, Kim SS. Clinical application of polyether ester urethane in endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2012; 53: 743-748
• 5 Rhee SC, Kim JS. A simple method of fabricating nasal packing armed with ventilation tube. J Craniofac Surg 2008; 19: 1385-1386
• 6 Lee SH, Shim WS, Shin SO. et al. Endoscopic endonasal reduction of medial blow out fracture using Nasopore Forte(R). Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 2011; 54: 617-622
• 7 Wang YP, Wang MC, Chen YC. et al. The effects of Vaseline gauze strip, Merocel, and Nasopore on the formation of synechiae and excessive granulation tissue in the middle meatus and the incidence of major postoperative bleeding after endoscopic sinus surgery. J Chin Med Assoc 2011; 74: 16-21
• 8 Kim HY, Kim SR, Park JH. et al. The usefulness of nasal packing with vaseline gauze and airway silicone splint after closed reduction of nasal bone fracture. Arch Plast Surg 2012; 39: 612-617
• 9 Cote DW, Wright ED. Triamcinolone-impregnated nasal dressing following endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Laryngoscope 2010; 120: 1269-1273
• 10 Woo KS, Lee SH, Shin WH, Cho PD. Outcome analysis of nasal bone fracture with regard to the duration of nasal packing. Abstract book, 70th Congress of the Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. 2012 Nov 9-11; Seoul, Korea 60
• 11 Huang G, Chen X, Jiang H. Effects of NasoPore packing in the middle ear cavity of the guinea pig. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011; 145: 131-136