CC BY-NC 4.0 · Arch Plast Surg 2012; 39(02): 138-142
DOI: 10.5999/aps.2012.39.2.138
Original Article

Toe Tissue Transfer for Reconstruction of Damaged Digits due to Electrical Burns

Hyung-Do Kim
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Good Moonhwa Hospital, Busan, Korea
,
So-Min Hwang
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Good Moonhwa Hospital, Busan, Korea
,
Kwang-Ryeol Lim
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Good Moonhwa Hospital, Busan, Korea
,
Yong-Hui Jung
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Good Moonhwa Hospital, Busan, Korea
,
Sung-Min Ahn
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Good Moonhwa Hospital, Busan, Korea
,
Jennifer K. Song
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Good Moonhwa Hospital, Busan, Korea
› Author Affiliations

Background Electrical burns are one of the most devastating types of injuries, and can be characterized by the conduction of electric current through the deeper soft tissue such as vessels, nerves, muscles, and bones. For that reason, the extent of an electric burn is very frequently underestimated on initial impression.

Methods From July 1999 to June 2006, we performed 15 cases of toe tissue transfer for the reconstruction of finger defects caused by electrical burns. We performed preoperative range of motion exercise, early excision, and coverage of the digital defect with toe tissue transfer.

Results We obtained satisfactory results in both functional and aesthetic aspects in all 15 cases without specific complications. Static two-point discrimination results in the transferred toe cases ranged from 8 to 11 mm, with an average of 9.5 mm. The mean range of motion of the transferred toe was 20° to 36° in the distal interphalangeal joint, 16° to 45° in the proximal interphalangeal joint, and 15° to 35° in the metacarpophalangeal joint. All of the patients were relatively satisfied with the function and appearance of their new digits.

Conclusions The strategic management of electrical injury to the hands can be both challenging and complex. Because the optimal surgical method is free tissue transfer, maintenance of vascular integrity among various physiological changes works as a determining factor for the postoperative outcome following the reconstruction.

This article was presented at the Korean Society for Surgery of the Hand on November 25, 2011 in Seoul, Korea.




Publication History

Received: 01 October 2011

Accepted: 06 February 2012

Article published online:
24 April 2022

© 2012. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Cobbett JR. Free digital transfer. Report of a case of transfer of a great toe to replace an amputated thumb. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1969; 51: 677-679
  • 2 Robson MC, Murphy RC, Heggers JP. A new explanation for the progressive tissue loss in electrical injuries. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 73: 431-437
  • 3 Mann R, Gibran N, Engrav L. et al. Is immediate decompression of high voltage electrical injuries to the upper extremity always necessary?. J Trauma 1996; 40: 584-587
  • 4 Chick LR, Lister GD, Sowder L. Early free-flap coverage of electrical and thermal burns. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 89: 1013-1019
  • 5 Buchanan DL, Erk Y, Spira M. Electric current arterial injury: a laboratory model. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983; 72: 199-207
  • 6 Sturim HS. The treatment of electrical injuries. J Trauma 1971; 11: 959-965
  • 7 Hagan KF, Buncke HJ, Gonzalez R. Free latissimus dorsi muscle flap coverage of an electrical burn of the lower extremity. Plast Reconstr Surg 1982; 69: 125-129
  • 8 Peterson RA. Electrical burns of the hand. Treatment by early excision. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1966; 48: 407-424