Evidence-based Standardized Care Plans for Use Internationally to Improve Home Care Practice and Population Health

Summary

Objectives: To develop evidence-based standardized care plans (EB-SCP) for use internationally to improve home care practice and population health.

Methods: A clinical-expert and scholarly method consisting of clinical experts recruitment, identification of health concerns, literature reviews, development of EB-SCPs using the Omaha System, a public comment period, revisions and consensus.

Results: Clinical experts from Canada, the Netherlands, New Zealand, and the United States participated in the project, together with University of Minnesota School of Nursing graduate students and faculty researchers. Twelve Omaha System problems were selected by the participating agencies as a basic home care assessment that should be used for all elderly and disabled patients. Interventions based on the literature and clinical expertise were compiled into EB-SCPs, and reviewed by the group. The EB-SCPs were revised and posted on-line for public comment; revised again, then approved in a public meeting by the participants. The EB-SCPs are posted on-line for international dissemination.

Conclusions: Home care EB-SCPs were successfully developed and published on-line. They provide a shared standard for use in practice and future home care research. This process is an exemplar for development of evidence-based practice standards to be used for assessment and documentation to support global population health and research.

Keywords

Evidence-based practice - standardization - patient care planning - home care services - Electronic health records

• References

• 1 American Medical Informatics Association and AHIMA Terminology and Classification Policy Task Force.. Healthcare terminologies and classifications: An action agenda for the United States. Perspectives in Health Information Management, November 13, 2006. [Internet]; 2006. Available from: www.ahima.org.
• 2 Westra BL, Delaney CW, Konicek D, Keenan G. Nursing standards to support the electronic health record. Nurs Outlook 2008; 56 (05) 258 266.e1.
• 3 American Health Information Management Association.. Meaningful use vocabulary toolkit. [Internet]; 2010. Available from: http://library.ahima.org/xpedio/groups/public/documents/ahimabok1_048346.pdf.
• 4 Monsen KA, Westra BL, Yu F, Ramadoss VK, Kerr MJ. Data management for intervention effectiveness research: Comparing deductive and inductive approaches. Res Nurs Health 2009; 32 (06) 647-656.
• 5 Institute of Medicine.. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A new health system for the 21^st century. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 2001
• 6 Finfgeld-Connett D. Generalizability and transferability of meta-synthesis research findings. J Adv Nurs 2010; 66 (02) 246-254.
• 7 Scott SD. Getting research into practice: Which strategies work?. Nursing for Women’s Health 2008; 12 (03) 204-207.
• 8 Rutherford M. Standardized nursing language: What does it mean for nursing practice?. The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing. 2008 13(1).
• 9 ANA recognized terminologies and data element sets.. [Internet]; 2010. Available from: http://nursing world.org/npii/terminologies.htm.
• 10 Martin KS. The Omaha System: A key to practice, documentation, and information management. Reprinted 2nd Ed. Omaha, NE: Health Connections Press; 2005
• 11 Martin KS, Scheet NJ. Visiting Clinician Association of Omaha. The Omaha System: Applications for community health nursing. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1992
• 12 The Omaha System: Solving the clinical data-information puzzle.. [Internet]; 2011. Available from: omaha-system.org.
• 13 McCloskey JC, Bulechek GM. Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC). 4^th Ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2007
• 14 International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP).. [Internet]; 2011. Available from: www.icn.ch/pillarsprograms/international-classification-for-nursing-practicer/.
• 15 Saba V. Clinical Care Classification (CCC) System Manual: A guide to nursing documentation. New York: Springer; 2006
• 16 Monsen KA, Fitzsimmons LL, Lescenski Lytton AB, Schwichtenberg LD, Martin KS. A public health nursing informatics data-and-practice quality project. Comput Inform Nurs 2006; 24 (03) 152-158.
• 17 Asthma Care Plan [Internet]. 2009. Available from: http://omahasystemmn.org/Careplans/resp_cardiac_end/Washington_Asthma_Individual.pdf.
• 18 Minnesota Omaha System users group.. [Internet]; 2011. Available from: omahaysystemmn.org.
• 19 Brokel JM. Infusing clinical decision support interventions into electronic health records. Urologic Nursing 2009; 29 (05) 345-352 quiz 353.
• 20 Brokel JM, Harrison MI. Redesigning care processes using an electronic health record: A system’s experience. Joint Commission Journal on Quality & Patient Safety 2009; 35 (02) 82-92.
• 21 Martin KS, Monsen KA, Bowles KH. The Omaha System and meaningful use: Applications for practice, education, and research. Comput Inform Nurs 2011; 29 (01) 52-58.
• 22 Monsen KA, Radosevich DM, Kerr MJ, Fulkerson JA. Public health nurses tailor interventions for families at risk. Public Health Nurs 2011; 28 (02) 119-128.
• 23 International Home Care Evidence-based Standardized Care Plan [Internet];. 2010. Available from: http://omahasystemmn.org/Careplans/PeerReviewed/International/InternationalHomeCarePathway.pdf.
• 24 International Home Care Evidence-based Standardized Care Plan Resources [Internet]. 2010. Available from: http://omahasystemmn.org/Careplans/PeerReviewed/International/2011–02–07HomeCarePathwaysReferences.pdf.
• 25 Walker K. Why evidence-based practice now? A polemic. Nursing Inquiry 2003; 10 (03) 145-155.