CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · World J Nucl Med 2019; 18(04): 420-423
DOI: 10.4103/wjnm.WJNM_100_18
Case Report

Reverse redistribution on Rb-82: Does the mechanism of stress play a role?

Patrick Martineau
1   Department of Radiology, Health Sciences Centre, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
2   Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
,
Francois Harel
3   Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
,
Matthieu Pelletier-Galarneau
2   Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
3   Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

We present a case of reverse redistribution in a patient imaged with Rb-82 positron-emitting tomography. The patient was imaged twice in rapid succession using pharmacological stress – once with dipyridamole and once with dobutamine. The patient demonstrated reverse redistribution after dipyridamole but not after dobutamine administration. We speculate on the relationship between the pharmacological stressing agent and the presence of reverse redistribution.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.




Publication History

Received: 07 November 2018

Accepted: 21 December 2018

Article published online:
22 April 2022

© 2019. Sociedade Brasileira de Neurocirurgia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Soufer R, Dey HM, Lawson AJ, Wackers FJ, Zaret BL. Relationship between reverse redistribution on planar thallium scintigraphy and regional myocardial viability: A correlative PET study. J Nucl Med 1995;36:180-7.
  • 2 Weiss AT, Maddahi J, Lew AS, Shah PK, Ganz W, Swan HJ, et al. Reverse redistribution of thallium-201: A sign of nontransmural myocardial infarction with patency of the infarct-related coronary artery. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986;7:61-7.
  • 3 Kashefi A, Bijan B, Kuo J, Shelton D. Clinical significance of reverse perfusion pattern in Rubidium-82 myocardial perfusion PET-CT studies. J Nucl Med 2011;52:1116.
  • 4 Tanesecu D. Apparent worsening of thallium-201 myocardial defects during redistribution-what does it mean? J Nucl Med 1979;20:688.
  • 5 Brown KA, Benoit L, Clements JP, Wackers FJ. Fast washout of thallium-201 from area of myocardial infarction: Possible artifact of background subtraction. J Nucl Med 1987;28:945-9.
  • 6 Lear JL, Raff U, Jain R. Reverse and pseudo redistribution of thallium-201 in healed myocardial infarction and normal and negative thallium-201 washout in ischemia due to background oversubtraction. Am J Cardiol 1988;62:543-50.
  • 7 Fukuzawa S, Ozawa S, Nobuyoshi M, Inagaki Y. Reverse redistribution on tl-201 SPECT images after reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction: Possible mechanism and prognostic implications. Heart Vessels 1992;7:141-7.
  • 8 Sakata K, Yoshida H, Ono N, Ohtani S, Mori N, Yokoyama S, et al. Implications of delayed image on simultaneous thallium-201/technetium-99m pyrophosphate dual emission computed tomography early after acute myocardial infarction. Jpn Circ J 1993;57:27-36.
  • 9 Mesotten L, Maes A, Herregods MC, Desmet W, Nuyts J, Van de Werf F, et al. PET “reversed mismatch pattern” early after acute myocardial infarction: Follow-up of flow, metabolism and function. Eur J Nucl Med 2001;28:466-71.
  • 10 Ito BR, Libraty DH, Engler RL. Effect of transient coronary occlusion on coronary blood flow autoregulation, vasodilator reserve and response to adenosine in the dog. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;18:858-67.