Assessment of heart rate variability during different propofol effect site concentrations in patients with supratentorial tumours: A pilot study

Abstract

Background: Impaired autonomic function (AF) can result in adverse cardiovascular events during the perioperative period. Literature suggests that patients with intracranial space-occupying lesions experience impaired AF depending on the site of tumour and associated raised intracranial pressure (ICP). The complex interaction between general anaesthetics, AF and intracranial tumours with raised ICP has not been extensively studied. Objective: This study was aimed at evaluating the cardiac AF (in terms of heart rate variability [HRV]) in patients undergoing surgery for supratentorial tumours, at baseline and at different propofol effect site concentrations (Ce) during anaesthetic induction and the results were compared with patients undergoing non-cranial surgeries. Materials and Methods: In this prospective observational study, consecutive adult patients undergoing surgeries for supratentorial tumour (study group) and brachial plexus injury (control group) were recruited. Electrocardiogram was recorded for 5 min at three time points – before propofol induction, at propofol Ce 2 μg/ml and at Ce 4 μg/ml. Results: Forty-five patients were recruited, 24 in study group and 21 in control group. In spite of similar baseline heart rate and blood pressure, low frequency (LF), high frequency (HF) and total power were significantly higher in control group. Baseline LF/HF, though higher in patients with intracranial tumour (craniotomy: 2.2 ± 2.2, control: 1.2 ± 1.1), was not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.197). HRV variables in both the groups changed the same way in response to the increasing propofol Ce. Conclusion: HRV measurements were significantly different at baseline between the two groups. Following propofol administration, haemodynamic changes and HRV changes were similar in both the groups and also between the two groups.

Keywords

Autonomic nervous system - heart rate variability - intracranial pressure - propofol - target controlled infusion

• REFERENCES

• 1 The autonomic nervous system and the adrenal medulla. In: Guyton AC, Hall JE. editors. Textbook of Medical Physiology. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2006. p. 748-60
• 2 Mazzeo AT, La Monaca E, Di Leo R, Vita G, Santamaria LB. Heart rate variability: A diagnostic and prognostic tool in anesthesia and intensive care. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2011; 55: 797-811
• 3 Akselrod S, Gordon D, Ubel FA, Shannon DC, Berger AC, Cohen RJ. Power spectrum analysis of heart rate fluctuation: A quantitative probe of beat-to-beat cardiovascular control. Science 1981; 213: 220-2
• 4 Hanss R, Bein B, Weseloh H, Bauer M, Cavus E, Steinfath M. et al. Heart rate variability predicts severe hypotension after spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2006; 104: 537-45
• 5 Kanaya N, Hirata N, Kurosawa S, Nakayama M, Namiki A. Differential effects of propofol and sevoflurane on heart rate variability. Anesthesiology 2003; 98: 34-40
• 6 Lancon JA, Haines DE, Raila FA, Parent AD, Vedanarayanan VV. Expanding cyst of the septum pellucidum. Case report. J Neurosurg 1996; 85: 1127-34
• 7 Yamour BJ, Sridharan MR, Rice JF, Flowers NC. Electrocardiographic changes in cerebrovascular hemorrhage. Am Heart J 1980; 99: 294-300
• 8 Mowery NT, Norris PR, Riordan W, Jenkins JM, Williams AE, Morris Jr. JA. Cardiac uncoupling and heart rate variability are associated with intracranial hypertension and mortality: A study of 145 trauma patients with continuous monitoring. J Trauma 2008; 65: 621-7
• 9 Kahraman S, Dutton RP, Hu P, Stansbury L, Xiao Y, Stein DM. et al. Heart rate and pulse pressure variability are associated with intractable intracranial hypertension after severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2010; 22: 296-302
• 10 Furgala A, Madroszkiewicz D, Madroszkiewicz E, Goscinski I, Kolasinska-Kloch W, Moskala M. et al. Autonomic system disturbances in patients with increased intracranial pressure caused by brain tumors evaluated by heart rate variability. Folia Med Cracov 2007; 48: 35-44
• 11 Sharma D, Bithal PK, Dash HH, Chouhan RS, Sookplung P, Vavilala MS. Cerebral autoregulation and CO2 reactivity before and after elective supratentorial tumor resection. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2010; 22: 132-7
• 12 Schnider TW, Minto CF, Shafer SL, Gambus PL, Andresen C, Goodale DB. et al. The influence of age on propofol pharmacodynamics. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 1502-16
• 13 Pan J, Tompkins WJ. A real-time QRS detection algorithm. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1985; 32: 230-6
• 14 Paisansathan C, Hoffman WE, Lee M, Ananda RC, Wheeler P. Autonomic activity during desflurane anesthesia in patients with brain tumors. J Clin Monit Comput 2007; 21: 265-9
• 15 Healy TE, Bellman MH, Pomfrett CJ. Respiratory sinus arrhythmia indicates light anaesthesia during caesarean section. Anesth Analg 1994; 78: S156
• 16 Pomfrett LJ, Barric JR, Healy TE. Respiratory sinus arrhythmia reflects surgical stimulation during light enflurane anaesthesia. Anesth Analg 1994; 78: S334
• 17 Yeganeh N, Roshani B, Almasi A, Jamshidi N. Correlation between bispectoral index and predicted effect-site concentration of propofol in different levels of target-controlled, propofol induced sedation in healthy volunteers. Arch Iran Med 2010; 13: 126-34
• 18 Hollos L, Enraght-Moony N. Effect site targeted propofol infusion in clinical practice: Comparison to Diprifusor. Internet J Anesthesiol 2000; 5: 1-6 Available from: http://www.ispub.com/IJA/5/3/12168 [Last accessed on 2015 Jan 26].
• 19 Conway DH, Hasan SK, Simpson ME. Target-controlled propofol requirements at induction of anaesthesia: Effect of remifentanil and midazolam. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2002; 19: 580-4