CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Radiol Imaging 2017; 27(04): 389-396
DOI: 10.4103/ijri.IJRI_44_17
Thoracic/ Cardiac

Appraisal of radiation dose with 64-slice computed tomography perfusion in lung cancer patients with special reference to SSDE: An initial experience in a tertiary care hospital

Shuchi Bhatt
Department of Radio-diagnosis, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, New Delhi, India
,
Ajai K Srivastava
Department of Radio-diagnosis, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, New Delhi, India
,
Neha Meena
Department of Radio-diagnosis, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, New Delhi, India
,
Shweta Thakur
Department of Radio-diagnosis, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
› Author Affiliations
Financial support and sponsorship Nil.

Abstract

Context: Computed tomography perfusion (CTP) is an important functional tool for lung cancer. It is expected to deliver high radiation dose, making its accurate estimation important. Size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) is a new dose metric, which includes the scanner output as well as the patient size. Aims: To determine radiation dose [CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose length product (DLP), effective dose (ED), and SSDE] for CTP in lung cancer and the correlation of CTDIvol, DLP, and SSDE with effective diameter and SSDE with weight, body mass index (BMI), and the scan length. Settings and Design: Cross-sectional study in the Department of Radio-diagnosis from October 2015 to March 2016. Patients and Methods: Due ethical approval and informed consent was taken. Thirty consecutive adult patients of lung cancer undergoing CTP study were included; various radiation dose parameters were determined and presented as mean ± SD. Statistical Analysis Used: Paired Student's t-test and Pearson correlation using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, Version 16. Results: Mean radiation dose was CTDIvol = 270.138 ± 1.627 mGy, DLP = 681 ± 53.496 mGy.cm, ED = 12.501 ± 0.923 mSv, SSDE = 388.90 ± 81.27 mGy. The CTDIvol and DLP had significant positive correlation (r = 0.556, P= 0.000 and r = 0.522, P= 0.003, respectively) with effective diameter. SSDE had strong negative correlation (r = −0.997, P= 0.000) with effective diameter, significant negative correlation with the BMI (r = −0.889; P= 0.000) and weight (r= −0.910, P= 0.000) of patients. Scan length was not significantly correlated in SSDE (r = −0.012, P= 0.951). Conclusions: Smaller sized patients had greater SSDE.



Publication History

Article published online:
27 July 2021

© 2017. Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Mnyusiwalla A, Aviv RI, Symons SP. Radiation dose from multidetector row CT imaging for acute stroke. Neuroradiology 2009;51:635-40.
  • 2 Bernard WS, Christopher P. World Cancer Report 2014.
  • 3 Miles KA, Griffiths MR. Perfusion CT: A worthwhile enhancement? BR J Radiol 2003;76:220-31.
  • 4 Meijerink MR, van Cruijsen H, Hoekman K, Kater M, van Schaik C, van Waesberghe JH, et al. The use of perfusion CT for evaluation of therapy combining AZD2171 with gefitinib in cancer patients. Eur Radiol 2007;17:1700-13.
  • 5 Wang J, Wu N, Cham MD, Song Y. Tumor in patients with advanced non small cell lung cancer: Perfusion CT evaluation of chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:1090-6.
  • 6 American Association of Physicist in Medicine. The measurement, reporting and management of radiation dose in CT (Report #96). AAPM task group 23 of the diagnostic imaging council CT committee. College Park, MD. AAPM 2008;96.
  • 7 Boone JM. CT dose estimation. University of California Davis Medical Center.
  • 8 Linto OW, Mattler FA. National conference on dose reduction in computed tomography, emphasis on paediatrics. Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:321-9.
  • 9 Thibault JB, Sauer KD, Bouman CA, Hsieh J. A 3-D statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT. Med Phys 2007;34:4526-44.
  • 10 McCollough CH, Leng S, Yu L, Cody DD, Boone JM, McNitt-Gray MF. CT dose index and patient dose: They are not the same thing. Radiology 2011;259:311-6.
  • 11 Li X, Samei E, Williams CH, Segars WP, Tward DJ, Miller MI, et al. Effects of protocol and obesity on dose conversion factors in adult body CT. Med Phys 2012;39:6550-71.
  • 12 Task Group on Control of Radiation Dose in Computed Tomography. Managing patient dose in computed tomography. A report of the ICRP. Ann ICRP 2000;30:7-45.
  • 13 Evaluation and routine testing in medical imaging departments Part 26: Constancy tests imaging performance of computed tomography X-ray equipment. IEC 61223-2-6 ed2.0.
  • 14 Pourjabbar S, Singh S, Padole A, Saini A, Blake MA, Kalra MK. Size-specific dose estimates: Localizer or transverse abdominal computed tomography images? World J Radiol 2014;6:210-7.
  • 15 Huda W, Ogden KM, Khorasani MR. Converting dose-length product into effective dose. Radiology 2008;248:995-1003.
  • 16 CT quality criteria (CT study group 2000) calculated with CT dose (version 0.6.7) National Board of Health, National Institute of Radiation Hygiene, Denmark.
  • 17 Brink JA, Morin RL. Size-specific dose estimation for CT: How should it be used and what does it mean? Radiology 2013;265:666-8.
  • 18 Moore BM, Brady SL, Mirro AE, Kaufman RA. Size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) provides a simple method to calculate organ dose for pediatric CT examinations. Med Phys 2014;41:071917.
  • 19 Boos J, Lanzman RS, Heusch P, Aissa J, Schleich C, Thomas C, Sawicki LM, et al. Does body mass index outperform body weight as a surrogate parameter in the calculation of size-specific dose estimates in adult body CT? Br J Radiol 2016;89:20150734.
  • 20 Westra SJ, Li X, Gulati K, Singh S, Liu B, Kalra MK, et al. Entrance skin dosimetry and size-specific dose estimate from pediatric chest CTA. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2014;8:97-107.
  • 21 Goh V, Dattani M, Farwell J, Shekhdar J, Tam E, Patel S, et al. Radiation dose from volumetric helical perfusion CT of the thorax, abdomen or pelvis. Eur Radiol 2011;21:974-81.