Free anteromedial thigh perforator flap: Complementing and completing the anterolateral thigh flap

ABSTRACT

Objective: Theobjective of this study was to determine the indications, utility, advantages and surgical approach for the anteromedial thigh (AMT) flap. Materials and Methods: We reviewed the records of the patients in whom the AMT flap was used for head and neck reconstruction. We use an anterior approach to harvest the anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap with a non-committal straight line incision. This preserves both ALT and AMT flap territories intact, and further decision is based on the intraoperative anatomy of perforator and pedicle. The ALT flap was usually used as the first choice when available and suitable. Results: Free AMT skin flaps were harvested in 24 patients. All flaps were used for the head and neck reconstruction. Two flaps had marginal flap necrosis. One flap was lost due to venous thrombosis. Discussion: The thigh is an excellent donor site as it has large available skin territory, expendable lateral circumflex femoral artery system and low donorsite morbidity. The ALT flap is the most commonly used flap for reconstruction of soft-tissue defects. However, it is characterised by variable vascular pedicle and perforator anatomy. The AMT flap is an excellent alternative when the ALT flap is not available due to variable perforator anatomy, injury to perforator, when an intermediate thickness is needed between distal and proximal thigh or a chimeric flap is needed. Conclusion: The AMT flap offers all the advantages of the ALT flap without increasing donor-site morbidity. The anterior non-committal approach keeps both the ALT and the AMT flap options viable.

KEY WORDS

Anteromedial thigh perforator flap - chimeric flaps - freestyle perforator flap

• REFERENCES

• 1 Song YG, Chen GZ, Song YL. The free thigh flap: A new free flap concept based on the septocutaneous artery. Br J Plast Surg 1984; 37: 149-59
• 2 Hallock GG. Flap selection. In: Wei FC, Mardini S. editors. Flaps and Reconstructive Surgery. China: Saunders Elsevier; 2009: 17
• 3 Wei FC, Mardini S. Free-style free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114: 910-6
• 4 Mardini S, Lin LC, Morgan SL, Salgado CJ, Wei FC. Anterolateral thigh flap. In: Wei FC, Mardini S. editors. Flaps and Reconstructive Surgery. China aunders Elsevier; 2009: 542
• 5 Kimata Y, Uchiyama K, Ebihara S, Nakatsuka T, Harii K. Anatomic variations and technical problems of the anterolateral thigh flap: A report of 74 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102: 1517-23
• 6 Wei FC, Jain V, Celik N, Chen HC, Chuang DC, Lin CH. Have we found an ideal soft-tissue flap?. An experience with 672 anterolateral thigh flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109: 2219-26
• 7 Celik N, Wei FC, Lin CH, Cheng MH, Chen HC, Jeng SF. et al. Technique and strategy in anterolateral thigh perforator flap surgery, based on an analysis of 15 complete and partial failures in 439 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109: 2211-6
• 8 Hong JP, Kim EK. Sole reconstruction using anterolateral thigh perforator free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119: 186-93
• 9 Luo S, Raffoul W, Luo J, Luo L, Gao J, Chen L. et al. Anterolateral thigh flap: A review of 168 cases. Microsurgery 1999; 19: 232-8
• 10 Saint-Cyr M, Wong C, Schaverien M, Mojallal A, Rohrich RJ. The perforasome theory: Vascular anatomy and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124: 1529-44
• 11 Schoeller T, Huemer GM, Shafighi M, Gurunluoglu R, Wechselberger G, Piza-Katzer H. Free anteromedial thigh flap: Clinical application and review of literature. Microsurgery 2004; 24: 43-8
• 12 Riva FM, Tan NC, Liu KW, Hsieh CH, Jeng SF. Anteromedial thigh perforator free flap: Report of 41 consecutive flaps and donor-site morbidity evaluation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013; 66: 1405-14
• 13 Hong JP, Kim EK, Kim H, Shin HW, Hwang CH, Lee MY. Alternative regional flaps when anterolateral thigh flap perforator is not feasible. J Hand Microsurg 2010; 2: 51-7
• 14 Koshima I, Yamamoto H, Moriguchi T, Orita Y. Extended anterior thigh flaps for repair of massive cervical defects involving pharyngoesophagus and skin: An introduction to the “mosaic” flap principle. Ann Plast Surg 1994; 32: 321-7
• 15 Chen HC, Tang YB. Anterolateral thigh flap: An ideal soft tissue flap. Clin Plast Surg 2003; 30: 383-401
• 16 Koshima I, Urushibara K, Inagawa K, Moriguchi T. Free tensor fasciae latae perforator flap for the reconstruction of defects in the extremities. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 107: 1759-65
• 17 Zhou G, Qiao Q, Chen GY, Ling YC, Swift R. Clinical experience and surgical anatomy of 32 free anterolateral thigh flap transplantations. Br J Plast Surg 1991; 44: 91-6
• 18 Hsieh CH, Yang JC, Chen CC, Kuo YR, Jeng SF. Alternative reconstructive choices for anterolateral thigh flap dissection in cases in which no sizable skin perforator is available. Head Neck 2009; 31: 571-5
• 19 Chana JS, Odili J. Perforator flaps in head and neck reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg 2010; 24: 237-54
• 20 Huang WC, Chen HC, Jain V, Kilda M, Lin YD, Cheng MH. et al. Reconstruction of through-and-through cheek defects involving the oral commissure, using chimeric flaps from the thigh lateral femoral circumflex system. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109: 433-41
• 21 Koshima I, Yamamoto H, Hosoda M, Moriguchi T, Orita Y, Nagayama H. Free combined composite flaps using the lateral circumflex femoral system for repair of massive defects of the head and neck regions: An introduction to the chimeric flap principle. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 92: 411-20
• 22 Wei FC, Celik N, Jeng SF. Application of “simplified nomenclature for compound flaps” to the anterolateral thigh flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115: 1051-5
• 23 Mardini S, Tsai FC, Wei FC. The thigh as a model for free style free flaps. Clin Plast Surg 2003; 30: 473-80