Contralateral lumbo-umbilical flap: A versatile technique for volar finger coverage

ABSTRACT

Background: While contemplating any difficult soft tissue reconstruction, patient comfort and compliance is of paramount importance. Reconstruction of the volar aspect of fingers and hand by the ipsilateral pedicled flaps (groin flap, abdominal flaps) is demanding as the flap inset is difficult for the surgeon and very uncomfortable for the patient. This often leads to flap complications. For the comfort of the patient, better compliance and ease of complete inset, we planned to manage soft tissue defects of the volar aspect of fingers and hand by a new contralateral pedicled lumbo-umbilical flap. This flap is based on the paraumbilical perforators of deep inferior epigastric artery. Materials and Methods: The contralateral pedicled lumbo-umbilical flap was used in eight patients with high-tension electrical burn injuries involving the volar aspect of fingers and hand. The patients were closely observed for first 6 weeks for any flap or donor site complications and then followed monthly to assess donor and recipient site characteristics for 6 months to 2 years. Results and Conclusion: Large flaps up to 8 cm × 16 cm were raised. All but one flaps survived completely. All patients were mobilised within 48 h and five were discharged in less than a week after initial inset. The flap is reliable, easy to harvest and easy to inset on the volar aspect of fingers. The arm is positioned in a very comfortable position. The main disadvantage, however, is a conspicuous abdominal scar.

KEY WORDS

Finger defect - groin flap - hand defect - high-tension electric burn - lumbo-umbilical flap - paraumbilical perforators

• REFERENCES

• 1 Eser C, Kesiktas E, Gencel C, Kokacya O, Yavuz M, Kerimov R. Algorithms of flap reconstruction in high-voltage electrical injuries: 26 years experience. Trauma Cases Rev 2015; 1: 1
• 2 Butler ED, Gant TD. Electrical injuries, with special reference to the upper extremities. A review of 182 cases. Am J Surg 1977; 134: 95-101
• 3 Luz DP, Millan LS, Alessi MS, Uguetto WF, Paggiaro A, Gomez DS. et al. Electrical burns: A retrospective analysis across a 5-year period. Burns 2009; 35: 1015-9
• 4 Khan TS, Wani AH, Darzi MA, Bijli AH. Epidemiology of burn patients in a teritiary care hospital in Kashmir: A prospective study. Indian J Burns 2014; 22: 98-103
• 5 Thomson CJ, Miles DA, Beveridge J, Chang PS. Treatment of electrical burns by single debridement followed by free-flap coverage: How important is timing?. Can J Plast Surg 2004; 12: 35-6
• 6 Xu X, Zhu W, Wu Y. Experience of the treatment of severe electric burns on special parts of the body. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1999; 888: 121-30
• 7 Gajbhiye AS, Meshram MM, Gajaralwar RS, Kathod AP. The management of electrical burn. Indian J Surg 2013; 75: 278-83
• 8 Groner JP, Weeks PM. Skin and soft tissue replacement in the hand. In: Smith JW, Aston SI. editors. Plastic Surgery. 4th ed.. Boston: Little, Brown and Company; 1991: p. 874-91
• 9 Stefanacci HA, Vandevender DK, Gamelli RL. The use of free tissue transfers in acute thermal and electrical extremity injuries. J Trauma 2003; 55: 707-12
• 10 Hallock GG. The utility of both muscle and fascia flaps in severe upper extremity trauma. J Trauma 2002; 53: 61-5
• 11 Wang XW, Zoh WH. Vascular injuries in electrical burns – The pathologic basis for mechanism of injury. Burns Incl Therm Inj 1983; 9: 335-8
• 12 Dias AD. Remember S.E.P.A. flap?. Indian J Plast Surg 2010; 43: 119-20
• 13 Goertz O, Kapalschinski N, Daigeler A, Hirsch T, Homann HH, Steinstraesser L. et al. The effectiveness of pedicled groin flaps in the treatment of hand defects: Results of 49 patients. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37: 2088-94
• 14 Fankhauser G, Klomp A, Smith A, Rececca A, Casey 3^rd W. Use of the pedicled tensor fascia lata myocutaneous flap in the salvage of upper extremity high-voltage electrical injuries. J Burn Care Res 2010; 31: 670-3
• 15 Yilmaz S, Saydam M, Seven E, Ercocen AR. Paraumbilical perforator-based pedicled abdominal flap for extensive soft-tissue deficiencies of the forearm and hand. Ann Plast Surg 2005; 54: 365-8
• 16 Yuce S, Oksuz M, Ersoz ME, Kocak OF, Kahraman A, Isik D. et al. Groin flap experience in the reconstruction of soft tissue defects of the hand. Turk J Plast Surg 2016; 24: 22-6
• 17 Li YY, Wang JL, Lu Y, Huang J. Resurfacing deep wound of upper extremities with pedicled groin flaps. Burns 2000; 26: 283-8
• 18 Bajantri B, Latheef L, Sabapathy SR. Tips to orient pedicled groin flap for hand defects. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2013; 17: 68-71
• 19 Hester Jr. TR, Nahai F, Beegle PE, Bostwick 3^rd J. Blood supply of the abdomen revisited, with emphasis on the superficial inferior epigastric artery. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 74: 657-70
• 20 Boyd JB, Taylor GI, Corlett R. The vascular territories of the superior epigastric and the deep inferior epigastric systems. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 73: 1-16
• 21 El-Mrakby HH, Milner RH. The suprafascial course of the direct paraumbilical perforator vessels. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109: 1766-8
• 22 Gutwein LG, Merrell GA, Knox KR. Paraumbilical perforator flap for soft tissue reconstruction of the forearm. J Hand Surg Am 2015; 40: 586-92
• 23 Kim KS, Noh BK, Kim DY, Lee SY, Cho BH. Thin paraumbilical perforator-based cutaneous island flap for scrotal resurfacing. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108: 447-51
• 24 Liu Y, Zang M, Zhu S, Chen B, Ding Q. Pre-expanded paraumbilical perforator flap. Clin Plast Surg 2017; 44: 99-108
• 25 Salmon M. The arterial anatomy of skin flaps. In: Taylor GI, Tempest M. editors. Arteries of the Skin. London: Churchill-Livindstone; 1988
• 26 Balakrishnan C, Hackenson D, Balakrishnan A, Elliott D, Careaga D. Reconstruction of the chin using an expanded deltopectoral flap following multiple recurrences of oral cancer. Can J Plast Surg 2012; 20: e37-9