Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.4103/ijmbs.ijmbs_65_21
Small bite closure in midline laparotomy; A practice to reduce the surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, and incisional hernia
Background: Postoperative wound site complications are a significant source of morbidity after midline laparotomy. The study's objectives were to compare the two suture patterns for fascial closure in midline abdominal wounds and their effect on postoperative wound site complications. Materials and Methods: Over 4 years, the prospective comparative study was conducted at the Government Medical College Hospital, Srinagar. All the patients ≥18 years and ≤70 years of age underwent midline laparotomy for various indications were included. Patients were randomized to two groups using computer-generated numbers based on closure techniques. Group A; Large Tissue Bite closure (10 mm from the wound edge and 10 mm apart and Group B; Small Tissue Bite closure (5–7 mm from the wound edge and 5–7 mm apart). Effect of age, sex, body mass index (BMI), albumin, and suture bite on postoperative complications were analyzed. Results: Among 324 patients who met the inclusion criteria, the mean age was 39.17 years, 84.56% were male with a Male: Female ratio of 5.48. Two hundred and two (62.35%) patients had large tissue bite closure, and 122 (37.75%) had small bite closure. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups concerning age, sex, albumin levels, BMI, and type of surgery. About 35.64% of patients in the large tissue bite closure group and 19.67% patients in small bite closure developed surgical site infection (SSI) (P = 0.002). The difference in wound dehiscence between the two groups (15.84% vs. 7.38%) was statistically insignificant (P = 0.29). In midline laparotomy closure, the small bites technique results in significantly less incisional hernias than the large bites technique (P = 0.00001). None of our patients expired during the study period. Conclusion: The small bite technique substantially reduces SSIs, wound dehiscence, and incisional hernia. The accident-emergency and general surgery residents, in particular, should be made familiar with this technique to avoid postoperative wound site complications and improve the quality of postoperative life.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Publication History
Received: 21 August 2021
Accepted: 21 September 2021
Article published online:
14 July 2022
© 2021. The Libyan Authority of Scientific Research and Technologyand the Libyan Biotechnology Research Center. All rights reserved. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License,permitting copying and reproductionso long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, oradapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Rahbari NN, Knebel P, Diener MK, Seidlmayer C, Ridwelski K, Stöltzing H, et al. Current practice of abdominal wall closure in elective surgery – Is there any consensus? BMC Surg 2009;9:8.
- 2 Di Leo A, Piffer S, Ricci F, Manzi A, Poggi E, Porretto V, et al. Surgical site infections in an Italian surgical ward: A prospective study. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2009;10:533-8.
- 3 Williams N, O'Connell PR, McCaskie A. Bailey and Love's Short Practice of Surgery, 27th Edition: The Collector's Edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. Ch. 5., p. 64-78. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315111087.
- 4 van 't Riet M, Steyerberg EW, Nellensteyn J, Bonjer HJ, Jeekel J, Friedman DW. Meta-analysis of techniques for closure of midline abdominal incisions. Br J Surg 2002;89:1350-6.
- 5 Pollock AV, Greenall MJ, Evans M. Single-layer mass closure of major laparotomies by continuous suturing. J R Soc Med 1979;72:889-93.
- 6 Millbourn D, Israelsson LA. Wound complications and stitch length. Hernia 2004;8:39-41.
- 7 van Ramshorst GH, Nieuwenhuizen J, Hop WC, Arends P, Boom J, Jeekel J, et al. Abdominal wound dehiscence in adults: Development and validation of a risk model. World J Surg 2010;34:20-7.
- 8 Jairam AP, Timmermans L, Eker HH, Pierik RE, van Klaveren D; PRIMA Trialist Group, et al. Prevention of incisional hernia with prophylactic onlay and sublay mesh reinforcement versus primary suture only in midline laparotomies (PRIMA): 2-year follow-up of a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2017;390:567-76.
- 9 Poulose BK, Shelton J, Phillips S, Moore D, Nealon W, Penson D, et al. Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: Making the case for hernia research. Hernia 2012;16:179-83.
- 10 van Ramshorst GH, Eker HH, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Lange JF. Impact of incisional hernia on health-related quality of life and body image: A prospective cohort study. Am J Surg 2012;204:144-50.
- 11 Museums FE, Antoniou SA, Bury K, Campanelli G, Conze J, Cuccurullo D, et al. European hernia society guidelines on the closure of abdominal wall incisions. Hernia 2015;19:1-24.
- 12 Millbourn D, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Effect of stitch length on wound complications after closure of midline incisions: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg 2009;144:1056-9.
- 13 de Vries HS, Verhaak T, van Boxtel TH, van den Heuvel W, Teixeira MB, Heisterkamp J, et al. Implementation of the small bites closure of abdominal midline incisions in clinical practice is correlated with a reduction in surgical site infections. Hernia 2020;24:839-43.
- 14 Sabiston DC, Townsend CM. Sabiston Textbook of Surgery: The Biological Basis of Modern Surgical Practice. 19th ed., Ch. 13. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2012.
- 15 Fortelny RH. Abdominal wall closure in elective midline laparotomy: The current recommendations. Front Surg 2018;5:34.
- 16 Harlaar JJ, Deerenberg EB, Dwarkasing RS, Kamperman AM, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel J, et al. Development of incisional herniation after midline laparotomy. BJS Open 2017;1:18-23.