CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Ibnosina Journal of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences 2020; 12(02): 123-129
DOI: 10.4103/ijmbs.ijmbs_58_20
Original Article

Logistic regression analysis to predict mortality risk in COVID-19 patients from routine hematologic parameters

Sudhir Bhandari
1   Department of Medicine, SMS Medical College and Attached Hospitals, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
,
Ajit Shaktawat
1   Department of Medicine, SMS Medical College and Attached Hospitals, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
,
Amit Tak
2   Department of Physiology, SMS Medical College and Attached Hospitals, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
,
Bhoopendra Patel
3   Department of Physiology, Government Medical College, Barmer, Rajasthan, India
,
Jyotsna Shukla
2   Department of Physiology, SMS Medical College and Attached Hospitals, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
,
Sanjay Singhal
2   Department of Physiology, SMS Medical College and Attached Hospitals, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
,
Kapil Gupta
2   Department of Physiology, SMS Medical College and Attached Hospitals, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
,
Jitendra Gupta
2   Department of Physiology, SMS Medical College and Attached Hospitals, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
,
Shivankan Kakkar
4   Department of Pharmacology, SMS Medical College and Attached Hospitals, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
,
Amitabh Dube
2   Department of Physiology, SMS Medical College and Attached Hospitals, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
› Author Affiliations

Background: The triage of coronavirus-19 patients into various strata based on some prognostic indicator might prove a utilitarian strategy in the management of epidemic. The goal of health-care facilities is optimization of the use of medical resources. The present study aimed to develop a predictor model of mortality risk from routine hematologic parameters. Patients and Methods: In this retrospective case–control study, seventy survivors (n = 47) and nonsurvivors (n = 23) were enrolled who were laboratory-confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases from SMS Medical College, Jaipur (Rajasthan, India). The clinical and routine blood profile of the survivors and nonsurvivors was recorded. A logistic regression model was fitted with step-wise method to the above dataset with dependent variable such as survivor or nonsurvivor and independent variables such as age, sex, symptoms, random blood glucose, and complete blood count. The best model was selected on the basis of Akaike information criterion. Results: It was observed that differential neutrophil count (%) and random blood sugar (RBS in mg/dL) are the statistically significant regressors (P < 0.05). The performance metrics of the model with 5-fold cross-validation showed area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, and validation accuracy to be 0.95, 90%, 92%, and 70%, respectively. The cutoff probability comes out at 0.30 for the outcome (nonsurvivor as success). Conclusion: The study concludes that differential neutrophil count and RBS levels can be used as early screening tools of mortality risk in COVID-19 patients and they assist in further patient management.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.




Publication History

Received: 25 May 2020

Accepted: 17 June 2020

Article published online:
07 July 2022

© 2020. The Libyan Authority of Scientific Research and Technologyand the Libyan Biotechnology Research Center. All rights reserved. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License,permitting copying and reproductionso long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, oradapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Worldometers. Available from: http://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/. [Last accessed on 2020 May 22].
  • 2 Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020;395:497-506.
  • 3 Indrayan A, Malhotra RK. Medical Biostatistics. 4th ed. Florida, USA: In Relative Risk and Odds Ratio CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group; 2018. p. 358.
  • 4 Indrayan A, Malhotra RK. Medical Biostatistics. 4th ed. Florida, USA: In Relationships: Qualitative Dependent, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group; 2018. p. 472-3.
  • 5 MATLAB Team, Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox 10.2, Classification Learner App, MATLAB. Version 9.0.0.341360 (R 2016a). Natick, Massachusetts: The Mathworks Inc.; R2015a.
  • 6 Singhal T. A review of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Indian J Pediatr 2020;87:281-6.
  • 7 JASP Team, JASP version 0.12.2 [Computer software] University of Amsterdam, Neherlands; Copyright 2013-2019.
  • 8 Ruan Q, Yang K, Wang W, Jiang L, Song J. Clinical predictors of mortality due to COVID-19 based on an analysis of data of 150 patients from Wuhan, China. Intensive Care Med 2020;46:846-8.
  • 9 Green MS. Did the hesitancy in declaring COVID-19 a pandemic reflect a need to redefine the term? Lancet 2020;395:1034-5.
  • 10 Tan L, Wang Q, Zhang D, Ding J, Huang Q, Tang YQ, et al. Lymphopenia predicts disease severity of COVID-19: A descriptive and predictive study. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2020;5:33.
  • 11 Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2020;395:1054-62.
  • 12 Du R-H, Liang L-R, Yang C-Q, Wang W, Cao T-Z, Li M, et al. Predictors of mortality for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia caused by SARS-CoV-2: a prospective cohort study. European Respiratory Journal [Internet]. 2020;55:2000524. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00524-2020.
  • 13 Gupta R, Ghosh A, Singh AK, Misra A. Clinical considerations for patients with diabetes in times of COVID-19 epidemic. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2020;14:211-2.
  • 14 Singh AK, Gupta R, Ghosh A, Misra A. Diabetes in COVID-19: Prevalence, pathophysiology, prognosis and practical considerations. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2020;14:303-10.
  • 15 Li B, Yang J, Zhao F, Zhi L, Wang X, Liu L, et al. Prevalence and impact of cardiovascular metabolic diseases on COVID-19 in China. Clin Res Cardiol 2020;109:531-8.
  • 16 Vaduganathan M, Vardeny O, Michel T, McMurray JJ, Pfeffer MA, Solomon SD. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors in patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1653-9.
  • 17 Vincent JL, Taccone FS. Understanding pathways to death in patients with COVID-19. Lancet Respir Med 2020;8:430-2.
  • 18 Lippi G, Wong J, Henry BM. Hypertension in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A pooled analysis. Pol Arch Intern Med 2020;130:304-9.
  • 19 Pal R, Bhansali A. COVID-19, diabetes mellitus and ACE2: The conundrum. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice [Internet]. 2020;162:108132. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108132.
  • 20 Liu Y, Du X, Chen J, Jin Y, Peng L, Wang HH, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as an independent risk factor for mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. J Infect 2020;81:e6-12.
  • 21 Du Y, Tu L, Zhu P, Mu M, Wang R, Yang P, et al. Clinical features of 85 fatal cases of COVID-19 from Wuhan. A retrospective observational study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020;201:1372-9.
  • 22 Zhao X, Zhang B, Li P, Ma C, Gu J, Hou P, et al. Incidence, clinical characteristics and prognostic factor of patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis [Internet]. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; 2020. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.17.20037572.
  • 23 Muniyappa R, Gubbi S. COVID-19 pandemic, coronaviruses, and diabetes mellitus. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2020;318:E736-41.