Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2018; 12(01): 057-066
DOI: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_380_17
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Comparative abrasive wear resistance and surface analysis of dental resin-based materials

Maleeha Nayyer
1   Department of Dental Materials, Army Medical College, National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
,
Shahreen Zahid
1   Department of Dental Materials, Army Medical College, National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
,
Syed Hammad Hassan
1   Department of Dental Materials, Army Medical College, National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
2   Department of Prosthodontics, Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
,
Salman Aziz Mian
3   Department of Dental Materials, Institute of Dentistry, CMH Lahore Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan
,
Sana Mehmood
4   Interdisciplinary Research Centre in Biomedical Materials, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Lahore, Pakistan
,
Haroon Ahmed Khan
5   Department of Electrical Engineering, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan
,
Muhammad Kaleem
1   Department of Dental Materials, Army Medical College, National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
,
Muhammad Sohail Zafar
6   Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Taibah University, Madinah Munawwarah, Saudi Arabia
7   Department of Dental Materials, Islamic International Dental College, Riphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan
,
Abdul Samad Khan
8   Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
15 October 2019 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the surface properties (microhardness and wear resistance) of various composites and compomer materials. In addition, the methodologies used for assessing wear resistance were compared. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted using restorative material (Filtek Z250, Filtek Z350, QuiXfil, SureFil SDR, and Dyract XP) to assess wear resistance. A custom-made toothbrush simulator was employed for wear testing. Before and after wear resistance, structural, surface, and physical properties were assessed using various techniques. Results: Structural changes and mass loss were observed after treatment, whereas no significant difference in terms of microhardness was observed. The correlation between atomic force microscopy (AFM) and profilometer and between wear resistance and filler volume was highly significant. The correlation between wear resistance and microhardness were insignificant. Conclusions: The AFM presented higher precision compared to optical profilometers at a nanoscale level, but both methods can be used in tandem for a more detailed and precise roughness analysis.

Key words:

Abrasion - atomic force microscopy - dental materials - Fourier transform infrared - surface roughness
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Jain V, Platt JA, Moore BK, Borges GA. In vitro wear of new indirect resin composites. Oper Dent 2009; 34: 423-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Leal A, Paula A, Ramalho A, Esteves M, Ferreira MM, Carrilho E. et al. Roughness and microhardness of composites after different bleaching techniques. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater 2015; 13: e381-8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Giacomelli L, Derchi G, Frustaci A, Orlando B, Covani U, Barone A. et al. Surface roughness of commercial composites after different polishing protocols: An analysis with atomic force microscopy. Open Dent J 2010; 4: 191-4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Cao L, Zhao X, Gong X, Zhao S. Anin vitro investigation of wear resistance and hardness of composite resins. Int J Clin Exp Med 2013; 6: 423-30
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Johansson A, Johansson AK, Omar R, Carlsson GE. Rehabilitation of the worn dentition. J Oral Rehabil 2008; 35: 548-66
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Hahnel S, Schultz S, Trempler C, Ach B, Handel G, Rosentritt M. et al. Two-body wear of dental restorative materials. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2011; 4: 237-44
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Han JM, Zhang H, Choe HS, Lin H, Zheng G, Hong G. et al. Abrasive wear and surface roughness of contemporary dental composite resin. Dent Mater J 2014; 33: 725-32
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Cramer NB, Stansbury JW, Bowman CN. Recent advances and developments in composite dental restorative materials. J Dent Res 2011; 90: 402-16
    Google Scholar
  • 9 De Souza GM. Nanoparticles in restorative materials Nanotechnology in Endodontics. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2015: p. 139-71
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Toledano M, Osorio R. New advanced materials for high performance at the resin-dentine interface. In: Deb S. editor Biomaterials for Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Applications. Basel, Switzerland: Karger Publishers; 2015: p. 39-48
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Al Khuraif AA. An in vitro evaluation of wear and surface roughness of particulate filler composite resin after tooth brushing. Acta Odontol Scand 2014; 72: 977-83
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Roselino Lde M, Chinelatti MA, Alandia-Román CC, Pires-de-Souza Fde C. Effect of brushing time and dentifrice abrasiveness on color change and surface roughness of resin composites. Braz Dent J 2015; 26: 507-13
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Chimello DT, Dibb RG, Corona SA, Lara E. Assessing wear and surface roughness of different composite resins after toothbrushing. Mater Res 2001; 4: 285-9
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Opdam NJ, van de Sande FH, Bronkhorst E, Cenci MS, Bottenberg P, Pallesen U. et al. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res 2014; 93: 943-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Choi MS, Lee YK, Lim BS, Rhee SH, Yang HC. Changes in surface characteristics of dental resin composites after polishing. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2005; 16: 347-53
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 García-Contreras R, Scougall-Vilchis R, Acosta-Torres L, Arenas-Arrocena C, García-Garduño R, de la Fuente-Hernández J. Vickers microhardness comparison of 4 composite resins with different types of filler. J Oral Res 2015; 4: 313-20
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Ilie N, Bucuta S, Draenert M. Bulk-fill resin-based composites: An in vitro assessment of their mechanical performance. Oper Dent 2013; 38: 618-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Wang LK, Shi LS, Zhu HS. An in vitro investigation of wear resistance and hardness of three kinds of new composite resins. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2008; 26: 15-8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Oliveira GU, Mondelli RF, Charantola Rodrigues M, Franco EB, Ishikiriama SK, Wang L. et al. Impact of filler size and distribution on roughness and wear of composite resin after simulated toothbrushing. J Appl Oral Sci 2012; 20: 510-6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Boaro LC, Gonçalves F, Guimarães TC, Ferracane JL, Pfeifer CS, Braga RR. Sorption, solubility, shrinkage and mechanical properties of “low-shrinkage” commercial resin composites. Dent Mater 2013; 29: 398-404
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Kaleem M, Khan AS, Rehman IU, Wong FS. Effect of beverages on viscoelastic properties of resin-based dental composites. Materials 2015; 8: 2863-72
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Gan SN, Kasim NH, Alsanabana F, Radzi ZB, Yahya NA. Polyurethane Oligomers for Use in Restorative Dentistry. Google Patents 2014; 00: 00
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Lim BS, Ferracane JL, Condon JR, Adey JD. Effect of filler fraction and filler surface treatment on wear of microfilled composites. Dent Mater 2002; 18: 1-1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Kovaříková I, Szewczyková B, Blaškoviš P, Hodúlová E, Lechovič E. Study and characteristic of abrasive wear mechanisms. Mater Sci Technol 2015; 1: 1335-9053
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Turssi CP, Ferracane JL, Vogel K. Filler features and their effects on wear and degree of conversion of particulate dental resin composites. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 4932-7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Zafar MS, Ahmed N. Effects of wear on hardness and stiffness of restorative dental materials. Life Sci J 2014; 11: 11-8
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Najeeb S, Khurshid Z, Zafar MS, Khan AS, Zohaib S, Martí JM. et al. Modifications in glass ionomer cements: Nano-sized fillers and bioactive nanoceramics. Int J Mol Sci 2016; 17: 1134
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Rizvi A, Zafar MS, Al-Wasifi Y, Fareed W, Khurshid Z. Role of enamel deminerlization and remineralization on microtensile bond strength of resin composite. Eur J Dent 2016; 10: 376-80
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Ferreira PM, Souto SH, Borges BC, de Assunção IV, da Costa GD. Impact of a novel polishing method on the surface roughness and micromorphology of nanofilled and microhybrid composite resins. Rev Port Estomatol Med Dent Cir Maxilofac 2015; 56: 18-24
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Rodrigues-Junior SA, Chemin P, Piaia PP, Ferracane JL. Surface roughness and gloss of actual composites as polished with different polishing systems. Oper Dent 2015; 40: 418-29
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar