Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2018; 12(03): 428-433
DOI: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_355_17
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Color changes of esthetic elastomeric ligatures evaluated with the Commission Internationale d'Éclairage color system

Vanessa Dias da Silva
1   School of Health Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande Do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
,
Caroline Dias
2   Private practice, Cachoeirinha, RS, Brazi
,
Leandro Berni Osório
3   Department of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
,
Paulo Ricardo Baccarin Matje
1   School of Health Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande Do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
,
Luciane Macedo de Menezes
1   School of Health Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande Do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
,
Eduardo Martinelli Santayana de Lima
1   School of Health Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande Do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
16 September 2019 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess and compare color changes in esthetic elastomeric ligatures after 30 days in situ using a spectrophotometer and the Commission Internationale d'Éclairage (CIE) color system. Materials and Methods: The sample comprised elastomeric ligatures of four color groups (n = 42): blue pearl (BP); colorless; white pearl (WP); and pearl. Four samples from each group were allocated in for quadrants of seven patients in a split-mouth model. Color measurements were performed with a spectrophotometer in the elastomeric ligatures as received (T0) and after 30 days in situ (T1). Variables L*, a*, and b* were compared between times (T1–T0) with Wilcoxon paired ranks; color changes were compared between groups with Kruskal–Wallis test; Dunn's test was used for multiple comparisons. Spearman's correlation was applied between CIELAB and CIEDE2000 calculations. Results: All groups showed color changes (T1–T0) in a* and b*, but only the Group BP had a change in L* (P < 0.01). Group C showed the greatest lightness decrease (ΔL = −2.49 ± 0.47) (P < 0.05), the smallest yellowing (Δb = 3.17 ± 0.88) (P < 0.05), and the smallest total color change (ΔE2000 = 3.19 ± 0.85), which had no statistical difference from Group WP (ΔE2000 = 3.36 ± 0.53). Correlation between ΔEab and ΔE2000 was moderate (r = 0.59; P < 0.01). Conclusions: Esthetic elastomeric ligatures became yellowish after 30 days in situ, and there were color differences between them.

Key words:

Elastomeric ligatures - esthetics - orthodontic appliances - pigmentation
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Fernandes AB, Ribeiro AA, Araujo MV, Ruellas AC. Influence of exogenous pigmentation on the optical properties of orthodontic elastic ligatures. J Appl Oral Sci 2012; 20: 462-6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Kim SH, Lee YK. Measurement of discolouration of orthodontic elastomeric modules with a digital camera. Eur J Orthod 2009; 31: 556-62
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Silva AV, Mattos GV, Kato CM, Normando D. In vivo color changes of esthetic orthodontic ligatures. Dent Press J Orthod 2012; 17: 76-80
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Kawabata E, Dantas VL, Kato CB, Normando D. Color changes of esthetic orthodontic ligatures evaluated by orthodontists and patients: A clinical study. Dental Press J Orthod 2016; 21: 53-7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ardeshna AP, Vaidyanathan TK. Colour changes of orthodontic elastomeric module materials exposed to in vitro dietary media. J Orthod 2009; 36: 177-85
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Cavalcante JS, de Castellucci e Barbosa M, Sobral MC. Evaluation of the susceptibility to pigmentation of orthodontic esthetic elastomeric ligatures. Dental Press J Orthod 2013; 18 (20) e1-8
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Fernandes AB, Ruellas AC, Araújo MV, Sant'Anna EF, Elias CN. Assessment of exogenous pigmentation in colourless elastic ligatures. J Orthod 2014; 41: 147-51
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Soldati DC, Silva RC, Oliveira AS, Kaizer MR, Moraes RR. Color stability of five orthodontic clear elastic ligatures. Orthodontics (Chic.) 2013; 14: e60-5
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Dias da Silva V, de Lima EM, Dias C, Osório LB. Analysis of the influence of food colorings in esthetic orthodontic elastomeric ligatures. Open Dent J 2016; 10: 516-21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Berns RS, Billmeyer FW, Saltzman M, Billmeyer FW. Billmeyer and Saltzman's Principles of Color Technology. 3rd ed.. New York: Wiley; 2000
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Hammad IA. Intrarater repeatability of shade selections with two shade guides. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89: 50-3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Elamin HO, Abubakr NH, Ibrahim YE. Identifying the tooth shade in group of patients using vita easyshade. Eur J Dent 2015; 9: 213-7
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Gómez-Polo C, Gómez-Polo M, Celemin-Viñuela A, Martínez Vázquez De Parga JA. Differences between the human eye and the spectrophotometer in the shade matching of tooth colour. J Dent 2014; 42: 742-5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Johnston WM. Color measurement in dentistry. J Dent 2009; 37 (Suppl. 01) e2-6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Hunter Lab. Hunter lab color scale. Insight Color 2008; 8: 1-4
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Sharma G, Wu W, Dalal EN. The CIEDE2000 color-difference formula: Implementation notes, supplementary test data, and mathematical observations. Color Res Appl 2005; 30: 21-30
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Luo MR, Cui G, Rigg B. The development of the CIE2000 colour-difference formula: CIEDE2000. Color Res Appl 2001; 26: 340-50
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Pérez Mdel M, Saleh A, Yebra A, Pulgar R. Study of the variation between CIELAB delta E* and CIEDE2000 color-differences of resin composites. Dent Mater J 2007; 26: 21-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Gómez-Polo C, Portillo Muñoz M, Lorenzo Luengo MC, Vicente P, Galindo P, Martín Casado AM. et al. Comparison of the CIELab and CIEDE2000 color difference formulas. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 115: 65-70
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Pecho OE, Ghinea R, Alessandretti R, Pérez MM, Della Bona A. Visual and instrumental shade matching using CIELAB and CIEDE2000 color difference formulas. Dent Mater 2016; 32: 82-92
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Perez Mdel M, Ghinea R, Herrera LJ, Ionescu AM, Pomares H, Pulgar R. et al. Dental ceramics: A CIEDE2000 acceptability thresholds for lightness, chroma and hue differences. J Dent 2011; 39 (Suppl. 03) e37-44
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Khashayar G, Bain PA, Salari S, Dozic A, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. et al. Perceptibility and acceptability thresholds for colour differences in dentistry. J Dent 2014; 42: 637-44
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Paravina RD, Ghinea R, Herrera LJ, Bona AD, Igiel C, Linninger M. et al. Color difference thresholds in dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent 2015; 27 (Suppl. 01) S1-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Lee YK. Comparison of CIELAB deltaE(*) and CIEDE2000 color-differences after polymerization and thermocycling of resin composites. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 678-82
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Xu BT, Zhang B, Kang Y, Wang YN, Li Q. Applicability of CIELAB/CIEDE2000 formula in visual color assessments of metal ceramic restorations. J Dent 2012; 40 (Suppl. 01) e3-9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 de Alencar E Silva Leite ML, da Cunha Medeiros E Silva FD, Meireles SS, Duarte RM, Andrade AK. The effect of drinks on color stability and surface roughness of nanocomposites. Eur J Dent 2014; 8: 330-6
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Eliades T, Eliades G, Silikas N, Watts DC. In vitro degradation of polyurethane orthodontic elastomeric modules. J Oral Rehabil 2005; 32: 72-7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar