Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2017; 11(02): 250-252
DOI: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_339_16
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Size discrepancies in molars and first key to optimal occlusion

Ahmet Arif Celebi
1   Department of Orthodontics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Dentistry, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
,
Sam H. Lee
2   University of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Dentistry, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
,
Chung How Kau
1   Department of Orthodontics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Dentistry, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
23 September 2019 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Objective: The aim of this research project was to determine whether the sizes of the first molars allow clinicians to achieve the first goal of an ideal clinical outcome. Material and Methods: Seventy-eight sets of dental casts that have been presented to the American Board of Orthodontics were evaluated. A Boley gauge was used to measure the length from the mesiobuccal cusp to the distobuccal cusp of the maxillary first molar and the length from the mesiobuccal groove of the mandibular first molar to the occlusal embrasure between the mandibular first and second molars. These two measurements were taken on both sides of each set of dental casts for a total of four measurements per set. Results: The maxillary measurements ranged from 3.6 to 6.9 mm with an average of 5.2 mm. The mandibular measurements ranged from 5.0 to 8.0 mm with an average of 6.5 mm. The data were tested for normality and found to be equally distributed. A t-test revealed significant differences in tooth sizes between maxillary and mandibular first molars on both sides. On average, the mesiodistal length measured on maxillary first molars was about 80% of that of their mandibular counterparts. Only 5 of the 78 sets of dental casts evaluated had equal maxillary and mandibular measurements on one side (either left or right), and none of them had equal measurements on both sides. Conclusion: Clinicians have to understand that tooth size discrepancies do exist in patients and that these discrepancies make the completion of a perfect case challenging.

Key words:

Dental occlusion - mandible - maxilla - molar tooth - permanent dentition
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Angle EH. The Upper First Permanent Molar as a Basis of Diagnosis. Items of Interest June; June, 1906
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Andrews LF. The six keys to normal occlusion. Am J Orthod 1972; 62: 296-309
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Casko JS, Vaden JL, Kokich VG, Damone J, James RD, Cangialosi TJ. et al. Objective grading system for dental casts and panoramic radiographs. American Board of Orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1998; 114: 589-99
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Akyalçin S, Dogan S, Dinçer B, Erdinc AM, Oncag G. Bolton tooth size discrepancies in skeletal class I individuals presenting with different dental angle classifications. Angle Orthod 2006; 76: 637-43
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Santoro M, Ayoub ME, Pardi VA, Cangialosi TJ. Mesiodistal crown dimensions and tooth size discrepancy of the permanent dentition of Dominican Americans. Angle Orthod 2007; 70: 303-7
    Google Scholar