CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Asian J Neurosurg 2021; 16(04): 817-820
DOI: 10.4103/ajns.ajns_315_21
Original Article

Linear cephalometric analysis of pharynx at the level of epiglottis among snorers and nonsnorers: A cross-sectional study

Ravi Rathod
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Meghna Institute of Dental Sciences, Nizamabad, Telangana
,
Vimal Devadoss
1   Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Rajas Dental College and Hospital, Tirunelveli
,
Baliram Jadav
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Meghna Institute of Dental Sciences, Nizamabad, Telangana
,
Reshmi Ninan
2   Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, CSI College of Dental Sciences and Research, Madurai, Tamil Nadu
,
B Kanagasabapathy
2   Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, CSI College of Dental Sciences and Research, Madurai, Tamil Nadu
,
A Ramshad
3   Consultant Orthodontist, Kuttichira, Kollam, Kerala
,
J Babu
4   Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, Division of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, University of Ha'il, Ha'il
,
C Swarnalatha
4   Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, Division of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, University of Ha'il, Ha'il
,
Abhishek Nayyar
5   Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Saraswati Dhanwantari Dental College and Hospital and Post-Graduate Research Institute, Parbhani, Maharashtra
› Author Affiliations

Background and Aim: Snoring, which falls within the spectrum of sleep-related breathing disorders, is considered to be one of the common symptoms of airway obstruction. Lateral cephalometric analysis is an effective way of diagnosing airway obstruction by evaluating skeletal and soft-tissue abnormalities in patients with sleep-disordered breathing. The present study was planned to analyze the pharyngeal space among snorers and nonsnorers in retroglossal region and in the region of the hypopharynx at the level of epiglottis. Materials and Methods: The present cross-sectional study included a total of 60 individuals who were grouped into snorers and nonsnorers based on their answers for the study questionnaire related to snoring. Digital lateral cephalograms were taken for all maintaining the exposure parameters, whereas Digora software was used for measurements related to the soft-tissue parameters. The two significant soft-tissue parameters analyzed were the distance of epiglottis from the tip of the soft palate, the retroglossal length and the distance of posterior pharynx from the tip of the epiglottis, the pharyngeal space. Statistical Analysis Used: The statistical analysis was done using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), whereas paired t-test was used for inter-group analysis. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The mean retroglossal length was found to be 25.52 mm among the snorers and 23.70 mm among the nonsnorers. In the case of pharyngeal space, a mean of 8.54 mm was recorded among the snorers, whereas among the nonsnorers, the respective mean value of 10.16 mm was observed. Conclusion: In the present study, pharyngeal space was found to be less at the level of the tip of epiglottis among the snorers compared to nonsnorers which can be attributed to be one of the significant reasons behind snoring and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.




Publication History

Received: 02 September 2021

Accepted: 27 September 2021

Article published online:
16 August 2022

© 2021. Asian Congress of Neurological Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Lefebre E, Moreau R. Snoring Causes, Diagnosis and Treatment. New York: Nova Science Publishers; 2010.
  • 2 Moses AJ. Protocol for primary treatment of snoring by dentists. Sleep Diagn Ther 2008;3:21-2.
  • 3 Counter P, Wilson JA. The management of simple snoring. Sleep Med Rev 2004;8:433-41.
  • 4 Ephros HD, Madani M, Yalamanchili SC. Surgical treatment of snoring and obstructive sleep apnoea. Indian J Med Res 2010;131:267-76.
  • 5 Fujita S, Conway W, Zorick F, Roth T. Surgical correction of anatomic azbnormalities in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1981;89:923-34.
  • 6 Quinn SJ, Daly N, Ellis PD. Observation of the mechanism of snoring using sleep nasendoscopy. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1995;20:360-4.
  • 7 Horner RL, Mohiaddin RH, Lowell DG, Shea SA, Burman ED, Longmore DB, et al. Sites and sizes of fat deposits around the pharynx in obese patients with obstructive sleep apnoea and weight matched controls. Eur Respir J 1989;2:613-22.
  • 8 Jehan S, Zizi F, Pandi-Perumal SR, Wall S, Auguste E, Myers AK, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea and obesity: Implications for public health. Sleep Med Disord 2017;1:00019. Epub 2017 Dec 12. PMID: 29517065; PMCID: PMC5836788.
  • 9 Azarbarzin A, Marques M, Sands SA, Op de Beeck S, Genta PR, Taranto-Montemurro L, et al. Predicting epiglottic collapse in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea. Eur Respir J 2017;50:1700345.
  • 10 Salamanca F, Leone F, Bianchi A, Bellotto RG, Costantini F, Salvatori P. Surgical treatment of epiglottis collapse in obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome: Epiglottis stiffening operation. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2019;39:404-8.
  • 11 Lin HS, Rowley JA, Badr MS, Folbe AJ, Yoo GH, Victor L, et al. Transoral robotic surgery for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome. Laryngoscope 2013;123:1811-6.
  • 12 Buchanan A, Cohen R, Looney S, Kalathingal S, De Rossi S. Cone-beam CT analysis of patients with obstructive sleep apnea compared to normal controls. Imaging Sci Dent 2016;46:9-16.