Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Asian J Neurosurg 2020; 15(03): 587-593
DOI: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_242_20
Original Article

Magnetic resonance imaging findings of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and cognitive function before and after ventriculoatrial shunt

Ryota Watahiki
1   Department of Rehabilitation, Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital, Tsukuba
2   Department of Life Science and Systems Engineering, Kyushu Institute of Technology Graduate School, Kitakyushu
,
Kenji Onouchi
3   Department of Neurology, Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba
,
Toru Machida
4   Department of Radiology, Sanno Hospital, Tokyo
,
Kiyohisa Natsume
2   Department of Life Science and Systems Engineering, Kyushu Institute of Technology Graduate School, Kitakyushu
,
Kiyoshi Takagi
5   Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Center, Nagareyama Central Hospital, Nagareyama
6   Department of Mechanical and Biofunctional Systems, Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Background: The idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is characterized by the triad of gait impairment, incontinence, and dementia. Cases that do not comply with the diagnostic criteria of ventriculomegaly have increased. It has led to the questions about the current criteria of guidelines. As the number of patients with dementia increases with aging, iNPH is importantly placed as a treatable dementia. The purpose of this study was to verify the validity of radiological diagnostic criteria of ventriculomegaly in iNPH. Materials and Methods: A board-certified neuroradiologist retrospectively examined 80 patients with definite iNPH about magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of Evans index (EI) and disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space hydrocephalus (DESH). The score of mini-mental state examination (MMSE) was measured to represent the cognitive function. The presurgical score of MMSE (pre-MMSE) and postsurgical best score of MMSE (best-MMSE) were compared statistically between patients dichotomized by either EI >0.3 or DESH. Results: The pre-MMSE was not different regardless of dichotomization by EI >0.3 or DESH. The MMSE score (median) increased significantly (P < 0.0001) by shunt from 20.0 to 26.0 in patients with EI >0.3 and from 21.5 to 25.5 with EI ≤0.3. No difference in the best-MMSE was observed between EI >0.3 and EI ≤0.3. The MMSE score increased significantly (P < 0.0001) by shunt from 21 to 27.5 with DESH and from 20 to 24.5 with non-DESH. Regardless of fulfilling or notfulfilling Japanese radiological diagnostic criteria (combination of EI >0.3 and DESH), cognitive function was significantly (P < 0.0001) improved to the same level. Only 24 cases (30%) fulfilled Japanese radiological diagnostic criteria. Conclusion: Cognitive function of iNPH patients was significantly improved by shunt regardless of MRI-findings. Radiological diagnostic criteria of iNPH may need careful reconsideration.

Key-words:

Cognitive function - idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus - mini-mental state examination - ventriculomegaly

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.




Publication History

Received: 21 May 2020

Accepted: 04 June 2020

Article published online:
16 August 2022

© 2020. Asian Congress of Neurological Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Williams MA, Malm J. Diagnosis and treatment of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2016;22:579-99.
  • 2 Relkin N, Marmarou A, Klinge P, Bergsneider M, Black PM. Diagnosing idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 2005;57 Suppl: S4-16.
  • 3 Ishikawa M, Hashimoto M, Kuwana N, Mori E, Miyake H, Wachi A, et al. Guidelines for management of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2008;48 Suppl: S1-23.
  • 4 Kitagaki H, Mori E, Ishii K, Yamaji S, Hirono N, Imamura T. CSF spaces in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: Morphology and volumetry. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:1277-84.
  • 5 Mori E, Ishikawa M, Kato T, Kazui H, Miyake H, Miyajima M, et al. Guidelines for management of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: Second edition. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2012;52:775-809.
  • 6 Takagi K, Watahiki R, Machida T, Onouchi K, Kato K, Oshima M. Reliability and interobserver variability of evans' index and disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space hydrocephalus as diagnostic criteria for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Asian J Neurosurg 2020;15:107-12.
  • 7 Craven CL, Toma AK, Mostafa T, Patel N, Watkins LD. The predictive value of DESH for shunt responsiveness in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Clin Neurosci 2016;34:294-8.
  • 8 Agerskov S, Wallin M, Hellström P, Ziegelitz D, Wikkelsö C, Tullberg M. Absence of disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space hydrocephalus, a sharp callosal angle, or other morphologic MRI markers should not be used to exclude patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus from shunt surgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:74-9.
  • 9 Brix MK, Westman E, Simmons A, Ringstad GA, Eide PK, Wagner-Larsen K, et al. The Evans' Index revisited: New cut-off levels for use in radiological assessment of ventricular enlargement in the elderly. Eur J Radiol 2017;95:28-32.
  • 10 Naruse H, Matsuoka Y. Post-operative improvement of 14 cases who were considered iNPH despite Evans' index of 0.3 or less. No Shinkei Geka 2013;41:25-30.
  • 11 Hiraoka K, Yamasaki H, Takagi M, Saito M, Nishio Y, Iizuka O, et al. Is the midbrain involved in the manifestation of gait disturbance in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus? J Neurol 2011;258:820-5.
  • 12 Mataró M, Matarín M, Poca MA, Pueyo R, Sahuquillo J, Barrios M, et al. Functional and magnetic resonance imaging correlates of corpus callosum in normal pressure hydrocephalus before and after shunting. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007;78:395-8.
  • 13 Hashimoto M, Ishikawa M, Mori E, Kuwana N, Study of INPH on neurological improvement (SINPHONI). Diagnosis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus is supported by MRI-based scheme: A prospective cohort study. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res 2010;7:18.
  • 14 van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJ, van Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke 1988;19:604-7.
  • 15 Kubo Y, Kazui H, Yoshida T, Kito Y, Kimura N, Tokunaga H, et al. Validation of grading scale for evaluating symptoms of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2008;25:37-45.
  • 16 Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189-98.
  • 17 Mori, E, Mitani Y, Yamadori A. Usefulness of a Japanese version of the Mini-Mental State test in neurological patients. Japanese J Neuropsychol 1985;1:82-90.
  • 18 Mathias S, Nayak US, Isaacs B. Balance in elderly patients: The “get-up and go” test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986;67:387-9.
  • 19 Evans WA. An encephalographic ratio for estimating ventricular and cerebral atrophy. Arch Neur Psych 1942;47:931-7.
  • 20 Adams RD, Fisher CM, Hakim S, Ojemann RG, Sweet WH. Symptomatic occult hydrocephalus with “normal” cerebrospinal-fluid pressure. A treatable syndrome. N Engl J Med 1965;273:117-26.
  • 21 Stein SC, Langfitt TW. Normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Predicting the results of cerebrospinal fluid shunting. J Neurosurg 1974;41:463-70.
  • 22 Black PM. Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Results of shunting in 62 patients. J Neurosurg 1980;52:371-7.
  • 23 Vanneste J, Augustijn P, Dirven C, Tan WF, Goedhart ZD. Shunting normal-pressure hydrocephalus: Do the benefits outweigh the risks? A multicenter study and literature review. Neurology 1992;42:54-9.
  • 24 Klinge P, Marmarou A, Bergsneider M, Relkin N, Black PM. Outcome of shunting in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus and the value of outcome assessment in shunted patients. Neurosurgery 2005;57:S40-52.
  • 25 INPH Guideline Study Group. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 2005;57 Suppl 3:S2-52.
  • 26 Hakim S, Adams RD. The special clinical problem of symptomatic hydrocephalus with normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Observations on cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics. J Neurol Sci 1965;2:307-27.
  • 27 Klinge P, Hellström P, Tans J, Wikkelsø C; European iNPH Multicentre Study Group. One-year outcome in the European multicentre study on iNPH. Acta Neurol Scand 2012;126:145-53.
  • 28 Kazui H, Miyajima M, Mori E, Ishikawa M; SINPHONI-2 Investigators. Lumboperitoneal shunt surgery for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (SINPHONI-2): An open-label randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 2015;14:585-94.
  • 29 Lemcke J, Stengel D, Stockhammer F, Güthoff C, Rohde V, Meier U. Nationwide incidence of normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) assessed by insurance claim data in germany. Open Neurol J 2016;10:15-24.
  • 30 Kuriyama N, Miyajima M, Nakajima M, Kurosawa M, Fukushima W, Watanabe Y, et al. Nationwide hospital-based survey of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus in Japan: Epidemiological and clinical characteristics. Brain Behav 2017;7:e00635.
  • 31 Yamada S, Ishikawa M, Miyajima M, Nakajima M, Atsuchi M, Kimura T, et al. Timed up and go test at tap test and shunt surgery in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurol Clin Pract 2017;7:98-108.
  • 32 Akiba C, Gyanwali B, Villaraza S, Nakajima M, Miyajima M, Cheng CY, et al. The prevalence and clinical associations of disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space hydrocephalus (DESH), an imaging feature of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus in community and memory clinic based Singaporean cohorts. J Neurol Sci 2020;408:116510.