PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Neuroanaesth Crit Care 2016; 03(03): 219-226
DOI: 10.4103/2348-0548.190067
Original Article
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.

Correlation of systolic pressure variation, pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in different preload conditions following a single dose mannitol infusion in elective neurosurgical patients

Ganesamoorthi Arimanickam
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Meenakshi Hospital, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu
,
Sethuraman Manikandan
1   Department of Anaesthesiology, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala, India
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
05. Mai 2018 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background: A Prospective observational study was designed assess the correlation between arterial pressure waveform derived indices and echocardiography derived stroke volume variation (SVV) at different preload conditions in patients undergoing elective craniotomies. Methods: Systolic pressure variation (SPV) and pulse pressure variation (PPV) were calculated from the arterial waveform. SVV was measured from transoesophageal echocardiography. After measuring baseline values for all three parameters, 1 g/kg of mannitol infusion (20%) was given over 15–20 min. Repeated measurements of SPV, PPV, SVV, urine output and peak airway pressure were done at the interval of 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 min after stopping mannitol infusion. Pearson correlation coefficient (level of significance), and receiver operating characteristics curve were used for statistical analysis. Results: Significant correlation was present between SPV and SVV throughout the study. Significant correlation between SPV and PPV was present only at 90 min and 2 h after mannitol. The predictive effect of SPV and PPV in differentiating a volume loss ≥10 mL/kg was better than SVV. The best cut-off values for SPV, PPV and SVV were 12%, 9% and 20%, respectively. Conclusions: During mechanical ventilation with a tidal volume of 8 mL/kg, SPV correlated significantly with SVV at different preload conditions following mannitol infusion. PPV correlated poorly with SVV. SPV and PPV correlated only in the presence of hypovolaemia.

Keywords

Dynamic indices - pulse pressure variation - stroke volume variation - systolic pressure variation
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest 2008; 134: 172-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Marik PE, Monnet X, Teboul JL. Hemodynamic parameters to guide fluid therapy. Ann Intensive Care 2011; 1: 1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Morgan BC, Martin WE, Hornbein TF, Crawford EW, Guntheroth WG. Hemodynamic effects of intermittent positive pressure respiration. Anesthesiology 1966; 27: 584-90
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Scharf SM, Brown R, Saunders N, Green LH. Hemodynamic effects of positive-pressure inflation. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol 1980; 49: 124-31
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Jardin F, Farcot JC, Gueret P, Prost JF, Ozier Y, Bourdarias JP. Cyclic changes in arterial pulse during respiratory support. Circulation 1983; 68: 266-74
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Michard F, Teboul JL. Using heart-lung interactions to assess fluid responsiveness during mechanical ventilation. Crit Care 2000; 4: 282-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Zhang Z, Lu B, Sheng X, Jin N. Accuracy of stroke volume variation in predicting fluid responsiveness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Anesth 2011; 25: 904-16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Berkenstadt H, Margalit N, Hadani M, Friedman Z, Segal E, Villa Y. et al. Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing brain surgery. Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 984-9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Coyle JP, Teplick RS, Long MC. Respiratory variations in systemic arterial pressure as an indicator of volume status. Anesthesiology 1983; 59: A53
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Deflandre E, Bonhomme V, Hans P. Delta down compared with delta pulse pressure as an indicator of volaemia during intracranial surgery. Br J Anaesth 2008; 100: 245-50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Durga P, Jonnavittula N, Muthuchellappan R, Ramachandran G. Measurement of systolic pressure variation during graded volume loss using simple tools on Datex Ohmeda S/5 monitor. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2009; 21: 161-4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Qiao H, Zhang MD J, Liang WM. Validity of pulse pressure and systolic blood pressure variation data obtained from a Datex Ohmeda S/5 monitor for predicting fluid responsiveness during surgery. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2010; 22: 316-22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Charron C, Fessenmeyer C, Cosson C, Mazoit JX, Hebert JL, Benhamou D. et al. The influence of tidal volume on the dynamic variables of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients. Anesth Analg 2006; 102: 1511-7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, Koch M, Vincent JL. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: Influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31: 517-23
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Vistisen ST, Koefoed-Nielsen J, Larsson A. Should dynamic parameters for prediction of fluid responsiveness be indexed to the tidal volume?. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2010; 54: 191-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Muller L, Louart G, Bousquet PJ, Candela D, Zoric L, de La Coussaye JE. et al. The influence of the airway driving pressure on pulsed pressure variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness. Intensive Care Med 2010; 36: 496-503
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 De Backer D, Taccone FS, Holsten R, Ibrahimi F, Vincent JL. Influence of respiratory rate on stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesthesiology 2009; 110: 1092-7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Westphal GA, Gonçalves AR, Bedin A, Steglich RB, Silva E, Poli-de-Figueiredo LF. Vasodilation increases pulse pressure variation, mimicking hypovolemic status in rabbits. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2010; 65: 189-94
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Radhakrishnan M, Mohanvelu K, Veena S, Sripathy G, Umamaheswara Rao GS. Pulse-plethysmographic variables in hemodynamic assessment during mannitol infusion. J Clin Monit Comput 2012; 26: 99-106
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Gouvêa G, Gouvêa FG. Measurement of systolic pressure variation on a Datex AS/3 monitor. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 1864
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Poelaert JI, Schüpfer G. Hemodynamic monitoring utilizing transesophageal echocardiography: The relationships among pressure, flow, and function. Chest 2005; 127: 379-90
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Rubin A. Statistics for Evidence-based Practice and Evaluation. 3rd ed.. New Delhi: Cengage Learning; 2012. p. 215
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Chatterjee N, Koshy T, Misra S, Suparna B. Changes in left ventricular preload, afterload, and cardiac output in response to a single dose of mannitol in neurosurgical patients undergoing craniotomy: A transesophageal echocardiographic study. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2012; 24: 25-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Sabharwal N, Rao GS, Ali Z, Radhakrishnan M. Hemodynamic changes after administration of mannitol measured by a noninvasive cardiac output monitor. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2009; 21: 248-52
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Willerson JT, Curry GC, Atkins JM, Parkey R, Horwitz LD. Influence of hypertonic mannitol on ventricular performance and coronary blood flow in patients. Circulation 1975; 51: 1095-100
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Lundvall J, Mellander S, White T. Hyperosmolality and vasodilatation in human skeletal muscle. Acta Physiol Scand 1969; 77: 224-33
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Coriat P, Vrillon M, Perel A, Baron JF, Le Bret F, Saada M. et al. A comparison of systolic blood pressure variations and echocardiographic estimates of end-diastolic left ventricular size in patients after aortic surgery. Anesth Analg 1994; 78: 46-53
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Biais M, Nouette-Gaulain K, Roullet S, Quinart A, Revel P, Sztark F. A comparison of stroke volume variation measured by Vigileo/FloTrac system and aortic Doppler echocardiography. Anesth Analg 2009; 109: 466-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Flachskampf FA, Badano L, Daniel WG, Feneck RO, Fox KF, Fraser AG. et al. Recommendations for transoesophageal echocardiography: Update 2010. Eur J Echocardiogr 2010; 11: 557-76
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Perrino Jr. AC, Harris SN, Luther MA. Intraoperative determination of cardiac output using multiplane transesophageal echocardiography: A comparison to thermodilution. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 350-7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar