PDF herunterladen
Indian Journal of Neurosurgery 2012; 01(02): 139-143
DOI: 10.4103/2277-9167.102281
Review Article
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.

Legal sanctity of consent for surgical procedures in India

Gauri Sharma
,
Vivek Tandon
1   Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
,
P. Sarat Chandra
1   Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
› Institutsangaben
Verantwortlicher Herausgeber dieser Rubrik:
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
18. Januar 2017 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
  als PDF herunterladen  Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

As surgeons, we are morally committed to respecting the right of self-determination of patients, thus an informed consent is necessary before any operative intervention. Many neurosurgical patients are incapable of giving consent because of impaired consciousness. Moreover, neurosurgical procedures involve high risks and often are time sensitive; therefore obtaining consent is a challenging job. Patients and their family members need immense courage, understanding, and trust before giving consent for a surgical procedure to a doctor. Lawsuits against doctors are on the rise and it is important to understand “what is consent?” in legal parlance.

Key words

Consent - Indian penal code - legality - neurosurgery - surgical procedure
 

  • References

  • 1 Section 13, Indian Contract Act, 1872.
    PubMed
  • 2 Section 10, Indian Contract Act, 1872.
    PubMed
  • 3 Section 14, Indian Contract Act, 1872.
    PubMed
  • 4 Section 11, Indian Contract Act, 1872.
    PubMed
  • 5 Indian Majority Act, 1875.
    PubMed
  • 6 Section 90 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.
    PubMed
  • 7 Section 87 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.
    PubMed
  • 8 1905, 104 N.W. 12 (Minn. 1905), decision of the Minnesota Supreme Court.
    PubMed
  • 9 Delhi Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette And Ethics) Regulations, 2000.
    PubMed
  • 10 Samira Kohli v. Dr. Prabha Manchanda and Another [(2008) 2 Supreme Court Cases 1].
    PubMed
  • 11 Etchells E, Sharpe G, Walsh P, Williams JR, Singer PA. Bioethics for clinicians: 1. Consent. CMAJ 1996; 155: 177-180
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Satyanarayana Rao KH. Informed consent: An ethical obligation or legal compulsion?. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2008; 1: 33-35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Pt. Parmanand Katara v. Union of India and Others [1989 All India Reporter 2039]; Pravat Kumar Mukerjee v. Ruby General Hospital II [(2005) Consumer Protection Judgment 35 National Commission]
    PubMed
  • 14 All India Reporter 1987 Kerala 52.
    PubMed
  • 15 Section 53 (1) of Code of Criminal Procedure.
    PubMed
  • 16 Reg. 7.16 of Medical Council of India - Code of Ethics Regulations, 2002.
    PubMed
  • 17 Childers R, Lipsett PA, Pawlik TM. Informed consent and the surgeon. J Am Coll Surg 2009; 208: 627-634
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 143 N.E.2d 3, 9 (1957) New York case of 1957.
    PubMed