PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Avicenna J Med 2016; 06(02): 39-46
DOI: 10.4103/2231-0770.179553
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Self-reported study habits for enhancing medical students' performance in the National Medical Unified Examination

Amr Idris
Department of Internal Medicine, Syrian Private University, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
,
Tareq Al Saadi
Department of Internal Medicine, Damascus University, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic
,
Basel Edris
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, Damascus University, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic
,
Bisher Sawaf
Department of Internal Medicine, Syrian Private University, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic
,
Mhd. Ismael Zakaria
Department of Internal Medicine, Syrian Private University, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic
,
Mahmoud Alkhatib
Department of Internal Medicine, Damascus University, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic
,
Tarek Turk
Department of Internal Medicine, Damascus University, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic
› Institutsangaben Financial support and sponsorship Nil.
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
  als PDF herunterladen Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background: The National Medical Unified Examination (NMUE) is currently required for graduation, joining postgraduate medical training, and practicing medicine in Syria. Objective: To investigate self-reported study habits that correlate with high performance on the NMUE. Methods: First through 3rd year residents at the three main hospitals in Damascus, Syria, were asked to complete a retrospective cross-sectional survey investigating their study habits and previous scores. Results: Significantly higher score was associated with >15 study h/day and allocating 1–40% of study time for practicing questions. Mean NMUE score was not significantly different in relation to preparation months for examination or for those who reported spending all their time studying alone compared with spending any amount of time in a group setting. Scores of 231–240 on the Syrian scientific high school exam correlated with significantly higher NMUE performance compared with fewer scores, except scores of 221–230. For every 10 point increase in medical school cumulative grades, the NMUE score increased 3.6 (95% confidence interval 2.5–4.8). Conclusion: The NMUE score was significantly affected by hours spent studying per day, number of practice questions completed, percentage of study time allocated for doing questions, Syrian scientific high school exam scores, and the cumulative medical school class grades. It was not significantly affected by preparation months or studying in a group setting. More studies are needed to further describe and investigate the factors that might affect performance in the NMUE.

Keywords

Medical examination - medical students - National Medical Unified Examination


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
09. August 2021

© 2016. Syrian American Medical Society. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Dashash M. National Medical Unified Examination for Syrian and Foreign Medical Schools. The Center for Measurement & Evaluation in Higher Education. Available from: http://www.cme-edu.net/English/. [Last retrieved on 2015 Apr 16].
  • 2 The Center for Measurements and Evaluation in Higher Education. Your Guide to National Medical Unified Examination (NMUE). The Center for Measurements and Evaluation in Higher Education. Damascus, Syria; 2014.
  • 3 Kumar AD, Shah MK, Maley JH, Evron J, Gyftopoulos A, Miller C. Preparing to take the USMLE step 1: A survey on medical students' self-reported study habits. Postgrad Med J 2015;91:257-61.
  • 4 Plant A, Ericsson KA, Hill L, Asberg K. Why study time does not predict grade point average across college students: Implications of deliberate practice for academic performance. Contemp Educ Psychol 2005;30:96-116.
  • 5 Roediger HL, Karpicke JD. Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychol Sci 2006;17:249-55.
  • 6 Kang SK, McDermott KB, Roediger HL. Test format and corrective feedback modulate the effect of testing on memory retention. Eur J Cogn Psychol 2007;19:528-58.
  • 7 Kiewra KA, Benton SL. The effects of higher-order review questions with feedback on achievement among learners who take notes or receive the instructors' notes. Hum Learn 1985;4:225-31.
  • 8 Roediger HL 3rd, Gallo DA, Geraci L. Processing approaches to cognition: The impetus from the levels-of-processing framework. Memory 2002;10:319-32.
  • 9 Sokolove P, Marbach-Ad G. The benefits of out-of-class group study for improving student performance on exams: A comparison of outcomes in active learning and traditional college biology classes. J Excell Coll Teach 1999;10:49-67.
  • 10 Julian ER. Validity of the medical college admission test for predicting medical school performance. Acad Med 2005;80:910-7.
  • 11 Koenig JA, Sireci SG, Wiley A. Evaluating the predictive validity of MCAT scores across diverse applicant groups. Acad Med 1998;73:1095-106.
  • 12 Kleshinski J, Khuder SA, Shapiro JI, Gold JP. Impact of preadmission variables on USMLE step 1 and step 2 performance. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2009;14:69-78.
  • 13 Donnon T, Paolucci EO, Violato C. The predictive validity of the MCAT for medical school performance and medical board licensing examinations: A meta-analysis of the published research. Acad Med 2007;82:100-6.